tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19580203.post806916499705360495..comments2024-03-25T16:03:36.810-07:00Comments on The Existentialist Cowboy: The Imperial Origins of Feudal AmericaAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04598093941551759917noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19580203.post-13671124684623654322010-03-09T07:16:08.446-08:002010-03-09T07:16:08.446-08:00kenny's sideshow said...
Thanks for throwing...kenny's sideshow said...<br /><br /><em> Thanks for throwing Bugliosi under the bus, where he belongs</em><br /><br />He's right about Bush but even there I think he missed several points with respect to the specific charges against Bush. I haven't bothered picking nits with him on that. <br /><br />With respect to JFK, I can take EVERY frame of Zapruder --stabilize it --and demonstrate once and for all that JFK's head moves BACKWARD with respect to the limo interior and NOT the BG as would be the case had the camera move. <br /><br />I am quite sure the camera did move --but we can take that complete OUT OF THE EQUATION with stabilization. What will be left is JFK's head going BACK and to the LEFT as everyone who had ever seen Zapruder knows to be a fact. <br /><br />I haven't heard Vinnie's position with respect to CE-399. But if Vinnie wants to prosecute the case that CE-399 has ANY bona fides let alone was the fatal shot I wanna hear it. <br /><br />C'mon Vinnie! Make my day!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04598093941551759917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19580203.post-8610393153206287802010-03-08T18:30:04.637-08:002010-03-08T18:30:04.637-08:00Thanks for throwing Bugliosi under the bus, where ...Thanks for throwing Bugliosi under the bus, where he belongs. We certainly don't disagree with his 'prosecution and execution of George W. Bush for murder' but he never meant for it to go anywhere except as a money maker for him.<br /><br />Your Vietnam words hit close to home. It was the time of our awakening to the war dead in vain for the profit of a few and yet 45 years later it's still happening, only the locations change. We as individuals who have known this for so long must take some of the responsibility for not stopping it.kennyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14832889157632754957noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19580203.post-47418443437255025252010-03-08T12:28:45.260-08:002010-03-08T12:28:45.260-08:00Renegrade eye sez...
First the use of the world i...Renegrade eye sez...<br /><br /><em>First the use of the world is imprecise.</em><br /><br />What 'word' --exactly --are you referring to? <br /><br /><em>Both China and the US are modern capitalist countries.</em>\<br /><br />Where --exacly --did I say anything to the contrary? <br /><br /><em>China evaluated the experience of the Soviet Union, where shock measures were used, and the flooding of the economy with cheap goods. China carefully transitioned from a nationalized economy. It would be in tough shape, if it allowed the US to flood its market.</em><br /><br />Frankly, I think you've missed the point. Clearly --the U.S. is in NO position to 'flood' any market. Not it's own domestic market and certainly NOT the the uncontrolled population of China, a polluted industrial BLIGHT on mankind. <br /><br />I don't blame China for this outcome --though some might try. I blame the Bush crime family for being SUCKERED. It was Bush Sr who laid the ground work for Nixon's trip to China with his own in preparation. I have spoken with the Sr Bush about this. I suspect that the GOP saw China and dreamed of 'dumping product' on its vastness. Perhaps the GOP was just stupid and not crooked; perhaps the GOP did not, could not envision a not too distant future in which the U.S. would --literally --have NO product to dump!! Nahhhhhhh I am not inclined to give these fuckers the benefit of doubt. <br /><br />My point has always been that it just did not work out that way. The flip side is: perhaps the Sr Bush was not the dupe I think he was. Perhaps the GOP knew along that they were selling out the nation and the people and just didn't give a shit! Certainly, the history of that party since Reagan supports that view.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04598093941551759917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19580203.post-82986416074562974412010-03-08T11:41:05.613-08:002010-03-08T11:41:05.613-08:00I disagree with your stand on China.
First the us...I disagree with your stand on China.<br /><br />First the use of the world is imprecise. It may be an emotional response, but not an actual analysis. Both China and the US are modern capitalist countries.<br /><br />China evaluated the experience of the Soviet Union, where shock measures were used, and the flooding of the economy with cheap goods. China carefully transitioned from a nationalized economy. It would be in tough shape, if it allowed the US to flood its market.<br /><br />RegardsFrank Partisanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03536211653082893030noreply@blogger.com