Wednesday, January 16, 2008

'Able Danger': The 911 Commission is a Fraud

Even the co-chairs of the 911 commission have disowned it. A white wash at the behest of the White House, the 911 report is propaganda by committee, the mere imprimatur of legitimacy to cover up official lies. It is lipstick on a pig. [See: 9/11 Commission closes its doors to the public; Cover-Up Complete]
"Scamming America: The Official 9/11 Cover-up" is named after a quote by former Sen. Max Cleland, who resigned from the commission last November with the words, "Bush is scamming America."

Cleland attacked his own commission after the other members cut a deal to accept highly limited access to CIA reports to the White House that may indicate advance knowledge of the attacks on the part of the Bush administration. "This is a scam," Cleland said. "It's disgusting. America is being cheated."

"As each day goes by," Cleland said, "we learn that this government knew a whole lot more about these terrorists before September 11 than it has ever admitted.... Let's chase this rabbit into the ground. They had a plan to go to war and when 9/11 happened that's what they did; they went to war."


download the PDF version of the biggest cover up in White House history.

A new 9/11 Truth-inspired film called "Able Danger" will have its world premiere at the International Film Festival in Rotterdam (The Netherlands) next week. Watch the trailer: Able Danger. It's the story of the biggest cover up in American, world history. The obvious question --never asked by the American media --if Bush's official conspiracy of 911 were, in any way or in any part true, then why has it been necessary to quash all investigations, destroy evidence, in fact, cover up one of the most heinous crimes in world history? Here's the Wiki entry:
Able Danger was a classified military intelligence program under the command of the US Special Operations Command (SOCOM). It was created as a result of a directive from the Joint Chiefs of Staff in early October 1999 by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Hugh Shelton, to develop an Information Operations Campaign Plan against transnational terrorism, "specifically al-Qaeda."

In one instance, the program used data mining techniques to associate open source information with classified information in an attempt to make associations between individual members of terrorist groups. The objective of this particular project was to ascertain whether the data mining techniques and open source material were effective tools in determining terrorist activities, and if the resultant data could be used to create operational plans that could be executed in a timely fashion to interrupt, capture and/or destroy terrorists or their cells. [1] [2]

According to statements by Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and those of four others, Able Danger had identified the September 11, 2001, attacks leader Mohamed Atta, and three of the 9/11 plot's other 19 hijackers, as possible members of an al Qaeda cell linked to the '93 World Trade Center bombing. This theory was heavily promoted by Republican Representative Curt Weldon, vice chairman of the House Armed Services and House Homeland Security committees. In December 2006, an investigation by the US Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that those assertions were unfounded. It rejected as untrue "one of the most disturbing claims about the Sept. 11 terrorist strikes."[3] The committee has published a letter to its members as a result of these hearings, dated December 22, 2006. However, witness testimony from these hearings is not publicly available.
Check out the Complete 911 Timeline. Specifically: October 2000: DIA Official Refuses to Look at Information about Al-Qaeda, Mohamed Atta
Able Danger member Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer meets with the DIA deputy director and offers him a computer disc with information about al-Qaeda (including Mohamed Atta), but the DIA official declines to accept the disc.
January-March 2001: Intelligence Unit Tracking Al-Qaeda is Closed Down; Change in Leadership Factors in Closure
The unit has identified Mohamed Atta and three other 9/11 hijackers as members of an al-Qaeda cell operating in the United States January-February 2000). According to James D. Smith, a Pentagon contractor involved with the unit, the inspector general shuts down the operation “because of a claim that we were collecting information on US citizens,” and it is illegal for the military to do this. [WTOP Radio 103.5 (Washington), 9/1/2005] Others familiar with the unit later say it is closed down because it might have led to the exposure of another data mining project that was investigating US citizens allegedly illegally transferring sensitive US technology to the Chinese government.
November 30, 2005: Congressman Calls Able Danger ‘Bigger Cover-up than Watergate’
Rep. Curt Weldon (R) says of Able Danger, “I am convinced this is a bigger cover-up than Watergate.… More than 3,000 people were slaughtered and [the 9/11 Commission] deliberately kept the story from being part of its report because it would have embarrassed some of its members.”
Additional resources


Anonymous said...

I just watched Loose Change. I don't pretend to know what really happened. But one thing has already been proven, I think: the Bush administraton had a pretty good idea what was coming and let it happen. And they did that because they wanted war, fascism and a giant military build up. They said they wanted a "new Pearl Harbor", but what they really wanted was a new "Reichstag Fire".

Len Hart said...

You are correct, workshop. What Americans need to get into their bones is an elementary principle of law: probable cause!

Investigations are begun upon probable cause. Indictments are brought upon probable cause. Apparently, this is not taught in school. CIA Director Tom Hayden had apparently never heard of it.

Bush will never be "convicted" on this or any other blog. But what has been established beyond any reasonable doubt is this: there is probable cause NOW to indict George W. Bush for numerous crimes. There is probable cause NOW to begin a Grand Jury investigation of his knowledge and active complicity in the events of 911.

If Bush merely knew and did nothing he is guilty of a capital offense.

If he knew and actively participated, he is guilty of a capital offense.

I say let's get on with it! The significance of Magna Carta, a primary influence upon our founders, is this: not even Kings are above the law. And Bush is not even a King. In fact, he is not even an elected President.

Jesus del Norte said...

You are on a roll, my friend. These last three have been very nice.

Len Hart said...

Thanks Jesus. I checked out your bio and share your assessment of Pancho Villa. I grew up with stories of his various exploits --some of whom I heard from contemporaries of Villa.

Anonymous said...

You are on an amazing roll Len. Sadly, efforts and facts as yours will be ignored, even in the MS world of ABB (anyone/thing but bush)...consider this: We have the top tier Dems allowing Kucinich to be booted from the debates by the corporate media dogs and the establishment high court, We have people standing up in SC at a McCain town hall meeting yelling at him because he allowed their precious stars and bars to be retired from public display...not to be out done, we have Huckabee hawking the Bible as a replacement for the U.S. Constitution...and I get the feeling the real weird shit ain't even started yet....hold on to something, I do not know what....but it better have a good foundation to it.


Ed Encho said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ed Encho said...

Saying that Len is on a roll with these last few posts doesn't do him justice - the man is on fucking fire!

Keep on shootin' cowboy! You got the varmints on the run now.


kelley b. said...

I agree: your last week or so has been right on target.

It is excellent reading.

Now if we only could educate enough people. But I don't think that is going to happen soon. I like to think that if enough people write this down, some record might survive to let the future know exactly how the Republic became an Empire and thus fell.

And speaking of falling: you might want to remember Wellstone and stay off of small airplanes for awhile!

Len Hart said...

The comments I get here are a primary reason I keep plugging away on this blog. Thanks to all of you.

I agree completely with what is written about Huckabee the Huckster. He is precisely what Sinclair Lewis had in mind. The notion that the US was founded upon any religion whatsoever is downright pernicious. It is an evil lie eagerly exploited by those who know better. Bush, for example, who most probably a Satanist, if he is religious at all.

KellyB hit upon another issue: a "public" record. I cannot imagine how many excellent exposes have been written and published on the internet over the last six or seven years. I cannot think of this "record" as being in any way permanent. And I shudder to write about how easily the axis of CIA/MIC et al could wipe out the memories of major servers in a "terrorist" attack. Some serious thought needs to be given to other forms of archiving, something that might survive a magnetic pulse.

Bremertongreg said...

Here Here...
Len Hart for President!!!

Len Hart said...

bremertongreg said...

Len Hart for President!!!

If nominated, I will not run. If elected, I will not serve.

(But thanks for the thought, my friend :))