by Len Hart, The Existentialist CowboyI cannot name an instance in which an innocent person has tried to cover up a crime. What is the motive for lying about a crime? Conversely, I can think of few if any guilty persons who have not tried, in one way or the other, to cover up a crime or, in other ways, escape the consequences of the crime. A guilty person can be depended upon to lie about a crime. An innocent person would be an idiot to do so.
Because the guilty are sure to lie about a crime and/or destroy evidence, there are laws --on the books --that make those actions crimes in themselves. The recent Bush administration is a specimen, an example that illustrates the principles: 1) an innocent person is an idiot who lies about a crime; 2) Conversely, a guilty person can be counted on to lie about the crime. The Bush administration lied about 911 and tried to cover it up with simple if not moronic strategies:
- Shock
- Awe
- Roll out a cover story while everyone is still in shock
- Impugn the patriotism of anyone daring to criticize it
- Begin a war of oil/resource theft --an excuse to wave the wave, commit war crimes, murder and atrocities under the banner!
That Bush lied about 911 is 'probable cause' to begin a real investigation and --no --it is not too late. It is my understanding that there are no statutes of limitations on the crimes of mass murder and high treason.
There is probable cause to begin a federal investigation of George W. Bush right now. Bush can be proven to have lied and/or mis-represented crucial aspects of 911. This alone is 'probable cause' to convene a federal grand jury to re-open the case in order to focus on the hard evidence that was, in fact, ordered destroyed by Bush and company. 911 was a crime and the destruction of relevant evidence is, likewise, several crimes: felony destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice, et al. Despite the massive destruction of evidence, it is clear and provable that only Buscho had all three: method, motive and opportunity!
Motive: OIL!
Subpoena all members of Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force including the maps in which was carved up the oil fields of Iraq. Those maps survived and should be placed in evidence. METHOD! That's a cakewalk as well as the opportunity. Marvin Bush, who was conveniently put in charge of WTC security, will not cooperate and will lie if subpoenaed. That's fine. There is enough evidence to charge him with perjury, lying to Federal Grand Jury
The OPPORTUNITY afforded Bushco was its complicity with the rogue state of Israel by way of the so-called "Jewish Lobby".Larry Silverstein has much to explain to such a Federal Grand Jury. That a "Jewish Lobby exists may be a violation of Federal laws prohibiting FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS from lobbying. That's what EMBASSIES and consulates are for. But of late foreign governments have followed the Isreali example: cut out the middle man! That is increasingly the case as it has become common knowledge throughout the world that the government of the U.S. is, politely, for sale. Less politely, our politicians are whores.
A final summation to the jury should include the fact that ONLY those perpetrating crimes are sufficiently motivated to lie about them and obstruct justice! It must be pointed out to a jury considering the capital crimes charges against the person of George W. Bush that it was only upon the pretext of 911 that Bush's corrupt administration could begin a war against Iraq, a nation that had nothing whatsoever to do with 911; that the purpose of the invasion was to seize control of IRAQI oil, as evidenced by the meeting of Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force.
Who benefited?
That's easy. Dick Cheney's Halliburton which benefited from the seizure of Iraqi oil fields which were, in fact, Bush's number one priority in Iraq. Blackwater, a Halliburton subsidiary, likewise benefited from the U.S, invasion and theft of Iraqi oil resources.
It's long list and must be covered thoroughly in the summation to the jury that SHOULD consider the charges of mass murder, high treason, obstruction of justice, felony destruction of evidence., and ,perhaps the most obvious crime: Bush's overt violation of U.S. Codes, Title 18, Section 2441, War Crimes, which specifies the death penalty for those violations resulting in death.
Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.
-- War Crimes, TITLE 18, PART I &; CHAPTER 118 & § 2441At last, it was Conan Doyle's Sherlock Homes who said: "When you have eliminated the impossible whatever remains however implausible must be the truth!" Certainly --the Official Conspiracy Theory of 911 was and remains utterly impossible. Impossible things do not happen! It did not happen. Even members of the 911 Commission are now coming forward, revealing to the world that they were lied to by members of the Bush administration.
In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...
The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.
Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.
Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD? Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.
Farmer states...“at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.”
The 9/11 Commission head, Thomas Kean, was the Republican governor of New Jersey. He had the following to say... “We to this day don’t know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us, it was just so far from the truth. . . " When Bush's own handpicked commission failed to go along with the cover up and requested a criminal investigation, why was nothing done?
9/11 Commission member and former US Senator, Bob Kerrey, says, "No one is more qualified to write the definitive book about the tragedy of 9/11 than John Farmer. Fortunately, he has done so. Even more fortunately the language is clear, alive and instructive for anyone who wants to make certain this never happens again."
With the only "official" 9/11 report now totally false, where do we go from here? Who is hurt by these lies? The families of the victims of 9/11 have fought, for years, to get to the truth. For years, our government has hidden behind lies and secrecy to deny them closure.
--The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies
John Farmer John Farmer. [Source: Publicity photo]The team of investigators on the 9/11 Commission that is investigating the events of the morning of September 11 comes to believe that a key part of Vice President Dick Cheney’s account is false. The team, led by John Farmer, is convinced that the decision to authorize the military to shoot down threatening aircraft on 9/11 was made by Cheney alone, not by President Bush. According to journalist and author Philip Shenon: “If Farmer’s team was right, the shootdown order was almost certainly unconstitutional, a violation of the military chain of command, which has no role for the vice president. In the absence of the president, military orders should have been issued by Defense Secretary [Donald] Rumsfeld, bypassing the vice president entirely.”
No Evidence - Other than Cheney’s own account of his actions that morning, and a subsequent attempt Bush made to confirm this account, the team has found no evidence that the president was involved in making the shootdown decision before Cheney issued the order, and much evidence that he was unaware of this decision. Shenon will describe: “Even in moments of crisis, the White House keeps extraordinary records of communications involving Bush and his senior staff; every phone call is logged, along with a detailed summary of what happened during the call.… But for 9/11, the logs offered no evidence of a call between Cheney and Bush in which Bush authorized a shootdown. And Farmer’s team reviewed more than just one set of communications logs. There were seven of them—one maintained by the White House telephone switchboard, one by the Secret Service, one by the Situation Room, and four separate logs maintained by military officers working in the White House.”
--Mid 2004: 9/11 Commission Staff Doubts Cheney’s Account of Shootdown Order on 9/11The biggest hole in the official conspiracy theory i.e, the 'hijacked airplanes' scnarios is that WTC 7 fell though it was not hit by aircraft any sort and is, therefore, seemingly beyond explanation. 'Lucky' Larry himself said that it was 'pulled'. It most certainly was. Conan Doyle's character Sherlock Holmes said:
"When you have eliminated the impossible whatever remains however implausible must be the truth!"
--A. Conan DoyleYou can eliminate the 'official conspiracy theory of 911' as being utterly impossible. That it is also ludicrous and insulting to intelligent people merely belabors the point.
Silverstein had Method, Motive and Opportunity.
Of itself, this aspect of the story is worthy of several books. The curtain rises upon a despondent, ugly gnomish schlemiel named 'Lucky' Larry Silverstein who is, interestingly, on record, video tape to be precise, saying in fact that WTC 7, his property, was 'pulled'. 'Pulled' means 'controlled demolition'. Controlled demolition means that the building so 'pulled' was prepped carefully in advance. In advance of what? A pretext! A cover! Lucky Larry was not just lucky. No one rolls the dice on a bet of several billion bucks. Lucky Larry was not lucky, just crooked!
When someone like Lucky Larry buys a nearly worthless building --at any price --you have good reason to question his motives and his plans. We are not talking about a weekend 'fixer upper' to be flipped within a week or a month. No --the World Trade center buildings were huge, expensive, asbestos-ridden white elephants. It would have cost several fortunes to demolish them. But Lucky Larry got an offer he could not refuse, in fact, a Faustian bargain! Oy vay! Such a deal, already!!Within a mere six weeks of his purchase, Larry doubles his insurance policy. Just six weeks later, Lucky Larry sees his property destroyed in an act of precise timing not witnessed since Moses (or was it God) parted the Red Sea. Within six weeks, Lucky Larry sees his property, his white elephant, his money pit, utterly destroyed. So far, Lucky Larry is on a roll and has gotten away with it.
Silverstein's 911 insurance payoff is estimated at some 17-billion-dollars. Let me repeat that: that's BILLION dollars! But IF 911 had NOT occurred, Silverstein would most certainly have lost his schlemiely ass. The May 2001 issue of Business Ins. mag reports that critical money hemorrhaging at the white elephants of the WTC plagued by low vacancy rates and the utter lack of modern communications. Larry's decision to take out a 99-year-lease on WTC makes absolutely no sense unless he knew something that few others knew. Indeed, Lucky Larry took over the rest of the World Trade Center on July 24th, 2001--a mere 6 weeks before 911.
The previous owner was the New York Port Authority which had carried a grand total of 1.5 billion dollars of insurance for all of the buildings. Lucky Larry, upside down at the the time, demanded, got, 3.5 billion worth of insurance, payable in cash if the WTC were to be destroyed. It was destroyed and Larry was seen smiling on 911.
There is probable cause to arrest and charge Lucky Larry right now! Many another less well-connected crook has been indicted upon much less 'probable cause' in other cases. But --as we have learned --911 is a special case which suspended habeas corpus, the burden of proof, the rule of law, indeed, the Constitution itself!
Lucky Larry just happened to have been a very close personal friend of Benyamin Netanyahu, a radical zionist credited with having invented the "war on terror" back in 1979. Netanyahu is on record celebrating the 911 attacks! This man is a friend??
- Some facts about 911: NO STEEL BUILDING has ever collapsed due to fire
- NO steel building has ever 'just weakened' to the point of collapse.
- the presence of nano-thermite has been confirmed and peer-reviewed by some 20 or so physicists
- Physicists have like-wise confirmed that 'steel' was --in fact --turned to dust at WTC on 911.
I am not an 'anomaly theorist'. I am into credible explanations consistent with proven, verifiable science. The word anomaly, often used by Bush partisans and official theorists, does not prove or support Bush's official conspiracy theory of 19 hijackers. Anomaly is a cop out! There is no record, no proof, no evidence that any alleged hijacker ever got on any flight on 911. Chalking it all up to 'anomaly' is a cop out that explains nothing, proves nothing! 'Anomolies' and baseless ex post facto 'explanations' are the purview of crooks and liars.
The Washington Post said that Hani Hanjour did not have a ticket. Then how did he get on baord Flt 77? For that matter, how did he get off? There is no wreckage traceable to ANY 757 at the pentagon. NONE. Nor are there any Arab names on the official autopsy report! Explain that! Are Arabs magicians? Are we expected to believe that Muslims were raptured by a Christian 'God'?
About New York --WTC 7 was not struck by airliners; yet its collapse was reported by the BBC before it occurred. But why did it collapse? It was prepared well in advance as any CD expert will tell you is required. Who else but Silverstein could have taken out the insurance policy on this property?
We need to hear the whole story about what happened on 9/11/01. But no one is going
to give it to us. This is my story, which is at least plausible and probably quite more than that. I am sure it is not perfect and would welcome new, more relevant facts or corrections. Here are the kinds of people necessary to carry out the plot that I have just described:
Plotters
Obviously, 9/11 was the result of much planning. No one, not even those who support the official theory, disputes that this event was the result of a conspiracy. And those who conspire are criminals. We need to find those who fit the typical definition of a criminal suspect, those who had the means, the motive and the opportunity to commit the crime: Means ± They had to have the ability to jam or confuse air defense, schedule simulations,directly influence or control mass media, control public opinion and federal courts over a close election (2000) to ensure George W. Bushs installation as president, place explosives and/or usenew technology to demolish WTC buildings.
Motive
They had to belong or sympathize with groups like PNAC, the Project for the New American Century (which wanted a ³New Pearl Harbor´ to give the government latitude to start perpetual wars), declare our enemy (Osama bin Laden, Muslims, Arabs, etc.), unite the nation behind the radical neo-con/PNAC strategy, and put the public in emergency mode where they are susceptible to drastic measures like Patriot Act. Opportunity ± They needed to take advantage of one day when the plan came together without warning to everyone but them. Who has all three of these factors? ± One person has all three factors without a doubt and should be the leading suspect: then-Vice President Dick Cheney. He also had access to help from several groups of people, such as neo-conservatives and Mossad agents, who had access to airports and airplanes used in the plot. So, what was their plan? Obviously, we cannot go inside their minds as they prepared the plot, but we can look back at what happened and surmise their intentions.
The Plan
The plotters used a handful of intelligence agents to board or pretend to board specific flights and who secretly went to an operation center to fake cell phone calls to family and friends of the fake passengers. They made sure enough people were killed at the World Trade Center and Pentagon by explosives and/or other devices to scare the public into accepting "retaliation" on new enemies like Afghanistan (whom the Bush Administration had already secretly planned to invade). They covered up evidence that contradicted the official story by feeding information to the mass media about specific planes, passengers, etc. They may have used mock funerals (based on the Operation Northwoods plan) to convince the public of plane passenger deaths. But "they" screwed up: there is, in fact, no official evidence to suggest that Flight 93 was even in the air on 911!
Dean Hartwell, Misdirection: The Real Terrorists Copyright 2010
