Thursday, February 12, 2009

Why Bush Must be Prosecuted for War Crimes and Mass Murder

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

Bush committed war crimes for which he must be held to account if the phrase 'rule of law' is to mean anything in a post-Bush America. To hold every other American responsible for various laws and petty violations while making exceptions for a mass murderers, torturers, or aggressors is absurd and seditious. Either we are going to have a Democracy under the rule of law or we are not! The choice is ours and America is ours to lose.

As he occupied the White House, there were efforts afoot to 'make legal' after the fact the many crimes that Bush had already committed. This is absurd on its face. No other person living in the US has that kind of power --nor would it be tolerated! The issue was pressed when in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the United States Supreme Court ruled that George W. Bush had exceeded his authority with respect to US detainees in the so-called 'War on Terror'. Neither the Congressional Authorization for the Use of Military Force, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), nor the so-called inherent powers had authorized Bush to set up military tribunals at Guantanamo.

For those of us who had maintained that Bush is a "war criminal" who violated not only internenational conventions but also US criminal codes, the decision of the court was a measure of vindication. In effect, SCOTUS held that for a period of five years, the Bush/Rumsfeld/Cheney gang had been guilty of violating the Third Convention on treatment of prisoners of war as well as a US federal law of 1996 which binds the US executive to those relevant parts of the Geneva convention. [See: US Codes, Title 18, Section 2441]

Predictably, the conspiratorial GOP scrambled to let Bush off the hook. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said that Congress would reverse the Supreme Court's declaration; Sen. Arlen Specter who had much earlier cooked-up a 'magic bullet', went to work on the language of a bill that would, in effect, say that Bush committed capital crimes but would be excused, let off the hook, after the fact. This law would apply to no other accused murderer or torturer in America. Only the so-called 'President' would benefit from it.

I submit to Sen. McCain that Congress does not have the authority to reverse a decision of the supreme court; it can only pass a new law addressing its objections. Such new laws, however, must be consistent with the decision. That is the constitutional function of the court. Moreover, congress may not violate the US Constitution by passing laws which excuse culprits ex post facto!

No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

Article I, US Constitution

Ex post facto is latin for "from something done afterward" or "after the fact". Ex post facto law is retroactive. On it its face, this is unfair and unconstitutional. Ex post facto laws are not to be confused with pardons or amnesty.

Bush and his GOP co-conspirators are routinely at odds with the supreme law of the land but also simple common sense. Because ex post facto laws change —after the fact —the legal consequences of acts already committed, the ex post facto law becomes an instrument of oppression and tyranny. Hoping to crack down on dissenters, for example, a government need only make the voicing of certain opinions a crime but only after they've been printed, broadcast or spoken. These 'frontiers' of tyranny have been explored much earlier but Bush, Cheney and the GOP regime that supported them had learned all the wrong lessons from history. They thought that they had learned how to get away with it.

Such a tyrannical government need only make the law, round up the usual suspects, and prosecute them for actions legal at the time of their commission. Conversely, the dictator-in-chief, in such a society, need only subvert the very foundations of law and order itself and demand that his crimes be made legal —after the fact —after he had already perped them. This is absurd on its face. It allows an executives to rule by decree and make up the laws as he goes along. It removes Constitutional restraints. It gives to mere presidents dictatorial powers that not even British monarchs dared dream of.

Everything Bush knows he got by way of his Grandfather's old trading partner --Adolf Hitler, whose notorious Lesson Number One he summed up himself in one sentence.
Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death.

--Adolf Hitler

Bush learned how to rule ruthlessly though he is hated by the people. Hitler never got more than 37 percent of the vote in several elections called over a short period of time ending with the act of terrorism that Hitler would exploit to consolidate his dictatorship. That act was the Reichstag Fire, Hitler's 911. It's hard to imagine that anyone would dare go back to the well. Nevertheless, the tactic, having proved successful for Nazis, would be tried again.

On February 27, 1937, Hitler was having dinner with Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels when the phone rang to inform the future Fuhrer: "The Reichstag is on fire!" At the scene, Hitler and Goebbels, found Hermann Goring, later Hitler’s air minister, shouting "at the top of his lungs", blaming communists for an act of terrorism.

How Hitler became a dictator is recounted in many sources but William Shirer's Rise and Fall of the Third Reich is still among the very best.
From Goring's Reichstag President's Palace an underground passage, built to carry the central heating system, ran to the Reichstag building. Through this tunnel Karl Ernst, a former hotel bellhop who had become the Berlin S.A. leader, led a small detachment of storm troopers on the night of February 27 to the Reichstag, where they quickly scattered gasoline and self-igniting chemicals and then made their way quickly back to the palace the way they had come. At the same time a half-witted Dutch Communist with a passion for arson, Marinus van der Lubbe, had made his way into the huge, darkened and to him unfamiliar building and set some small fires of his own. This feeble-minded pyromaniac was a godsend to the Nazis. He had been picked up by the S.A. a few days before after having been overheard in a bar boasting that he had attempted to set fire to several public buildings and that he was going to try the Reichstag next.

The coincidence that the Nazis had found a demented Communist arsonist who was out to do exactly what they themselves had determined to do seems incredible but is nevertheless supported by the evidence. The idea for the fire almost certainly originated at the top with Goebbels and Goring. Hans Gisevius, an official in the Prussian Ministry of the Interior at the time, testified at Nuremberg that 'it was Goebbels who first thought of setting the Reichstag on fire' and Rudolph Diels, the Gestapo chief, added in an affidavit that 'Goring knew exactly how the fire was to be started' and had ordered him 'to prepare, prior to the fire, a list of people who were to be arrested immediately after it.' General Franz Halder, Chief of the German General Staff during the early part of World War II, recalled at Nuremberg how on one occasion Goring had boasted of his deed.
At a luncheon on the birthday of the Fuehrer in 1942 the conversation turned to the topic of the Reichstag building and its artistic value. I heard with my own ears when Goring interrupted the conversation and shouted: "The only one who really knows about the Reichstag is I, because I set it on fire!" With that he slapped his thigh with the flat of his hand.
The Rise and Fall of The Third Reich (Touchstone Edition, 1990, p. 192-)
Hitler ordered a round up of the usual suspects, in other words, the opposition, consisting largely of communists whom the Nazis could, with but a shred of credibility, blame for an act of bloody terrorism.

Nazis knew what GOPPERS know now --that frightened and anxious people will willingly surrender the blessings of liberty. From Hitler's experience, Bush learned how to use a "Patriot Act" to crack down on dissent.

Hitler wasted no time. The very next day, he was in President Hindenburg's office urging the aging statesman to issue a patriot act, a decree entitled, “For the Protection of the People and the State.” Justified as a “defensive measure against Communist acts of violence endangering the state,” the decree suspended the constitutional guarantees pertaining to civil liberties:
Patriot Act vs, German Enabling Act:

The Decrees of 1933

(a) The February 28 Decree. One of the most repressive acts of the new Nazi government, this one allowed for the suspension of civil liberties ....The president was persuaded that the state was in danger and, hence, that the emergency measures embodied in the decree were necessary. Even though under Art. 48 of the constitution, the decree would have been withdrawn once the so-called emergency had passed, any hope of this happening was prevented by the establishment of Hitler's dictatorship following the Enabling Act (see below). It was in fact never withdrawn and remained until the end as an instrument of Nazi terror against ordinary citizens who ran foul of the regime.
ARTICLE 1. In virtue of paragraph 2, article 48,* of the German Constitution, the following is decreed as a defensive measure against communist acts of violence , endangering the state:

Sections 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 of the Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. Thus, restrictions on personal liberty [114], on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press [118], on the right of assembly and the right of association [124], and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications [117], and warrants for house-searches [115], orders for confiscation as well as restrictions on property [153], are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.
*Article 48 of the German Constitution of August 11, 1919: If public safety and order in Germany are materially disturbed or endangered, the President may take the necessary measures to restore public safety and order, and, if necessary, to intervene with the help of the armed forces. To this end he may temporarily suspend, in whole or in part, the fundamental rights established in Articles 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 ...........

Patriot Act:

Section 218 which amends the "probable cause" requirement before conducting secret searches or surveillance to obtain evidence of a crime;

Sections 215, 218, 358, and 508 which permit law enforcement authorities to have broad access to sensitive mental health, library, business, financial, and educational records despite the existence of previously adopted state and federal laws which were intended to strengthen the protection of these types of records;

Sections 411 and 412 which give the Secretary of State broad powers to designate domestic groups as "terrorist organizations" and the Attorney General power to subject immigrants to indefinite detention or deportation even if no crime has been committed; and Sections 507 and 508 which impose a mandate on state and local public universities who must collect information on students that may be of interest to the Attorney General.

Bush learned how to suspend civil liberties after a terrorist attack. At the time, only Representative Dennis Kucinich of Ohio called for a repeal of the Patriot Act.

Hitler had hoped to establish a "permanent" majority of elected Nazis in the Reichstag, a rubber stamp which would pass whatever laws he desired while making it all perfectly legal. Under Bush, Karl Rove spoke of creating a "permanent Republican majority", a 'majority' that would rubber stamp Bush's every decree. A GOP court that would make legal Bush's crimes even after he had already committed them.

Two weeks after the Reichstag fire, Hitler requested the Reichstag to temporarily delegate its powers to him so that he could adequately deal with the crisis. Hitler denounced his opposition, shouting at them "Germany will be free, but not through you!” Hitler won the vote 441 to 84. It gave him a two-thirds majority needed to suspend the constitution. On March 23, 1933, the “Enabling Act”--a patriot act -- made Hitler dictator of Germany. Bush had hoped the 'Patriot Act' would do the same for him.
This would be a whole lot easier if this was a dictatorship ...just as long as I'm the dictator!

--George W. Bush, President-elect

Just as Hitler cut a deal with Thyssen, Krupp, I.G. Farben et al, the triumvirate of Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld carved up the oil map of the Middle East for the benefit of big oil and and Halliburton. Hitler coveted Poland's rich coal deposits; Bush coveted Iraqi oil. Bush, was inspired by Hitler's play book. As was the case in 1939, it is still all about energy and for Bushco 'energy' means oil.

The esteemed historian John Keegan believed that Hitler might have won WWII had he kept Rommel supplied. Eschewing an invasion of Russia, Hitler would have been better advised to have ordered Rommel to seize the oil fields of the Middle East.

Bush also learned from his grandfather that there is big money -- a killing in fact --in the industrial murder business. Our own Treasury Department is the source for the following information about how US corporations, primarily US Steel, for whom Prescott Bush was banker, helped Hitler arm and wage war on the world while carrying out mass murder throughout Europe. US steel produced the following percentages of war munitions for Hitler and his Nazi war lords: Pig iron 50.8%; Pipe & tubes 45.5%; Universal plate 41.4%; Galvanized sheet 38.5%; Heavy plate 36%; Explosives 35%; Wire 22.1%.
George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.

The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.

His business dealings, which continued until his company's assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act, has led more than 60 years later to a civil action for damages being brought in Germany against the Bush family by two former slave labourers at Auschwitz and to a hum of pre-election controversy.

--How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power

This is the same firm for whom Prescott Bush acted as banker. In effect, then, Prescott was Hitler’s American banker.

Bush also learned how to outsource murder and atrocity in ways that benefit his right wing supporters. It's called "private enterprise" but in reality it's a form of socialism, farming out work to partners, robber barons, death merchants and hired murderers like Blackwater, a gang of paid thugs whom National Public Radio charges has strong connections with America's radical, religious, fascist right wing.
NPR: The war in Iraq has been partly outsourced to private military contractors which are performing many of the services that used to be done by the military.

My guest, Jeremy Scahill, has written a book about one of those companies, Blackwater, which he describes as "the world's most mercenary army and the embodiment of the Bush administration policy of privatizing military functions." The company, which was founded in 1996, made headlines in 2004 when four of its men were ambushed and set on fire by Sunni gunmen in Fallujah.

The charred remains of two of the men were hung on a bridge for public display. The families of the four men are suing Blackwater for wrongful death, raising a lot of questions about accountability and oversight when private contractors play a major role in war. Jeremy Scahill is a Polk Award-winning journalist who is a frequent contributor to The Nation and a correspondent for the radio and TV show, "Democracy Now." Jeremy Scahill -- if you wanted to write about a private military contractor, why did you focus on Blackwater?

--Blackwater: USA in Fallujah

Bush is ideologically allied with 'state absolutists', for whom the "state" is "God". That notion opposes every "American" value and those of truly religious folk who find the equation of "God" with the "state" a blasphemous notion. And so it is --not merely of religion but of reason.

Bushism is opposite the American ideal espoused by real patriots like Thomas Jefferson whom Bush and Dick Cheney would have derided as "pro-French", "helping the terrorists" or other equally stupid nonsense. James Madison who wrote the first draft of our Constitution would have been demonized as "quaint" by idiots like Gen. Hayden and Al Gonzales.

Bush must surely hate our Declaration of Independence because, in it, Thomas Jefferson sides with the misnamed "insurgency" that is most certainly analogous to Iraqi civilians upon whom the US has waged not a war --but a crime punishable by death under our own federal statutes!

The notion that Congress can somehow exculpate Bush for the crimes he's already committed is not merely absurd, it's seditious and dangerous —a short road to tyranny and dictatorship.

To her credit, Sen. Dianne Feinstein refuted every dubious argument put forward by McCain.

If the US had had a legitimate case for war against Iraq, it might have made a truthful case for it at the UN. Instead, Colin Powell's presentation was a deliberate fraud from start to finish. Powell himself later apologized but not soon enough to avoid every war crime, every death, every murder, every act of torture and mass murder that would follow. It was not only the very worst foreign policy blunder in US history, it is a war crime comparable to those perpetrated by Adolph Hitler and Pol Pot, a 'crime against humanity' comparable to those attributed to Josef Stalin.

It was claimed that the war in Iraq was based on the fundamental concept of removing a tyrant who supported terrorism against the United States. In fact, US foreign policy has never been based upon removing tyrants either tyrants or terrorists. Rather, the US has installed and supported both tyrants and terrorists. The US, itself, may be the world's number one terrorist, a rogue nation, a threat to world peace and humanity. Read prosecutor Lawrence Walsh's final report of the Iran/Contra affair.
The underlying facts of Iran/contra are that, regardless of criminality, President Reagan, the secretary of state, the secretary of defense, and the director of central intelligence and their necessary assistants committed themselves, however reluctantly, to two programs contrary to congressional policy and contrary to national policy. They skirted the law, some of them broke the law, and almost all of them tried to cover up the President's willful activities.

What protection do the people of the United States have against such a concerted action by such powerful officers? The Constitution provides for congressional oversight and congressional control of appropriations, but if false information is given to Congress, these checks and balances are of lessened value. Further, in the give and take of the political community, congressional oversight is often overtaken and subordinated by the need to keep Government functioning, by the need to anticipate the future, and by the ever-present requirement of maintaining consensus among the elected officials who are the Government.

The US invasion of Iraq in which an estimated 1.5 million Iraqi civilians were killed by US forces IS war crime, specifically, a war of aggression under both US Codes, the Geneva Convention and the principles of Nuremberg to which the US is bound by treaty. A first year law student could make the war crimes case against George W. Bush.
(a) Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.

--§ 2441. War crimes, US Codes, Title 18, Section 2441
One wanting or seeking a more dramatic introduction to Nuremberg, I suggest a motion picture from the late 90's: "Nuremberg" starring Alec Baldwin. With minor departures, this film is impressively accurate even to the portrayal of Dr. Gustav Gilbert, the psychologist who concluded that Nazi war criminals were 'evil' in that they 'lacked empathy', a trait that is, of late, found abundantly throughout the American 'conservative' movement, the GOP, the Bush administration. The portrayal of Goring by actor Brian Cox should have gotten an Oscar. Brilliant! As Nuremberg Chief Prosecutor Robert Jackson, Alec Baldwin, again, proved himself a serious actor.
When for years they have deceived the world, and masked falsehood with plausibilities, can anyone be surprised that they continue their habits of a lifetime in this dock? Credibility is one of the main issues of this Trial. Only those who have failed to learn the bitter lessons of the last decade can doubt that men who have always played on the unsuspecting credulity of generous opponents would not hesitate to do the same, now.

It is against such a background that these defendants now ask this Tribunal to say that they are not guilty of planning, executing, or conspiring to commit this long list of crimes and wrongs. They stand before the record of this Trial as bloodstained Gloucester stood by the body of his slain king. He begged of the widow, as they beg of you: "Say I slew them not."
And the Queen replied, "Then say they were not slain. But dead they are..." If you were to say of these men that they are not guilty, it would be as true to say that there has been no war, there are no slain, there has been no crime.

--Summation for the Prosecution -July 26, 1946, Chief US Prosecutor, Robert Jackson, Nuremberg War Crimes Trials [See also: The Impact of Nuremberg on Global Justice and Security]
You will find this closing --word for word --in the movie version.

Another observation about the movie is the fact that the producers literally re-created the court room in almost every detail. It has got to be one of the most accurate such re-creations in "filmdom".

I can tell you from sources very close to me and likewise the trial, it was, indeed, a "trial", an extraordinary ordeal that took its toll on the judges, the attorneys, the witnesses, the spectators, the media, the defendants, interpreters and translators, indeed, anyone connected with the trial in any way.

Robert Jackson himself had not wanted to absent himself from the Supreme Court. But Truman was "persuasive" and, once on the job, Jackson was ever hopeful that the principles forged might help prevent the recurrence of such unspeakable tragedy.

Jackson's mocking nemesis was Goring, whose legacy mocks, even in death, Jackson's idealistic hopes for humankind. Goring early on launched a pre-emptive strike in anticipation of a guilty verdict. Before it was returned, he called it "victor's justice", an evil implication that WWII victors were, in fact, no different from the Nazis. How we deal with Bush will either prove Goring correct or it will prove him wrong. If Bush gets away with it, Goring will be laughing at us from his grave.

Writer Kelly Kramer recently compiled a ‘resume’ for George W. Bush. Not every item listed are prosecutable as war crimes; but, certainly, they should be taken just as seriously. That Bush is prosecutable for war crimes is not susprising in context. That 'war crimes' punishable by death are among his many crimes should surprise no one. Following are Bush's 'central accomplishments' according to writer Kelly Kramer:
  • Shattered record for biggest annual deficit in history;

  • Set economic record for most private bankruptcies filed in any 12 month period;

  • Set all-time record for biggest drop in the history of the stock market;

  • First year in office set the all-time record for most days on vacation by any president in US history;

  • After taking the entire month of August off for vacation, presided over the worst security failure in US history;

  • In his first two years in office over 2 million Americans lost their jobs;

  • Cut unemployment benefits for more out of work Americans than any president in US history;

  • Appointed more convicted criminals to administration positions than any president in US history;

  • Signed more laws and executive orders amending the Constitution than any president in US history;

  • Presided over the biggest energy crises in US history and refused to intervene when corruption was revealed;

  • Cut healthcare benefits for war veterans;

  • Set the all-time record for most people worldwide to simultaneously take to the streets to protest a sitting American President, shattering the record for protest against any person in the history of mankind;

  • Dissolved more international treaties than any president in US history;

  • First president in US history to have all 50 states of the Union simultaneously go bankrupt;

  • Presided over the biggest corporate stock market fraud of any market in any country in the history of the world;

  • First president in US history to order a US attack and military occupation of a sovereign nation;

  • Created the largest government department bureaucracy in the history of the United States;

  • Set the all-time record for biggest annual budget spending increases, more than any president in US history;

  • First president in US history to have the United Nations remove the US from the human rights commission;

  • First president in US history to have the United Nations remove the US from the elections monitoring board;

  • All-time US (and world) record holder for most corporate campaign donations;

  • Biggest life-time campaign contributor presided over one of the largest corporate bankruptcy frauds in world history (Kenneth Lay, former CEO of Enron Corporation);

  • Spent more money on polls and focus groups than any president in US history;

  • First president to run and hide when the US came under attack (and then lied saying the enemy had the code to Air Force 1);

  • Took the biggest world sympathy for the US after 911, and in less than a year made the US the most resented country in the world (possibly the biggest diplomatic failure in US and world history);

  • With a policy of 'disengagement' created the most hostile Israeli-Palestine relations in at least 30 years;

  • Fist US president in history to have a majority of the people of Europe (71%) view his presidency as the biggest threat to world peace and stability;

  • First US president in history to have the people of South Korea more threatened by the US than their immediate neighbor, North Korea;

  • Changed US policy to allow convicted criminals to be awarded government contracts;

  • Set all-time record for number of administration appointees who violated US law by not selling huge investments in corporations bidding for government contracts;

  • Failed to fulfill his pledge to get Osama Bin Laden 'dead or alive';

  • Failed to capture the anthrax killer who tried to murder the leaders of our country at the United States Capitol building. After 18 months he has no leads and zero suspects;

  • In the 18 months following the 911 attacks he successfully prevented any public investigation into the biggest security failure in the history of the United States;

  • Removed more freedoms and civil liberties for Americans than any other president in US history;
  • Entered office with the strongest economy in US history and in less than two years turned every single economic category straight down.
This is, of course, an edited list. It omits the deliberate lies Bush told in order to wage a war of aggression against the people of Iraq. If so much as one person had died as a result of his lies and the war of aggression that followed, Bush would be subject to the death penalty under federal law, specifically, US Codes, Title 18, Section 2441. But, in fact, Bush death toll, his murder count, is at least 1.5 milllion Iraqi civilians who are dead as a direct result of US aggression. Former LA prosectuor Vince Bugliosi makes still another case that because Bush perpetrated a deliberate fraud in order to commence war, every death of every US soldier is one count of murder. Then, of course, there is evidence that deaths occurred as a result of the acts of torture that followed from Bush's orders. That Bush tried to make these acts legal ex post facto should be compelling evidence that his orders were planned and deliberate. They are punishable by death.

Justice Robert Jackson: Closing Statement,
Nuremberg Trial of Nazi War Criminals


Subscribe in a reader

Download DivX

Add to Technorati Favorites

, , ,

Spread the word

yahoo icerocket pubsub newsvine


Anonymous said...

Len, since you're on the Reichstag fire I'll just add some bits about 9/11.

The Essence Of September 11th has some very useful summaries of 9/11 (eg the Pentagon).

There is also an excellent account of discrepancies obtained from the flight stewards on 9/11:

Amy Sweeney was on Flight 11 when it was hijacked at 8.14am. Its transponder had been turned off, and the controller couldn't get a response from the pilots. Amy called AA flight service manager Michael Woodward on an airphone, told him the plane had been hijacked by men of Middle Eastern descent and gave him the seat locations of three of them: 9D, 9G and 10B. Woodward punched up the details on the computer. At least 20 minutes before the plane crashed, the airline had the names, addresses, phone numbers and credit cards of three of the five hijackers: Abdulaziz al-Omari, Satam al-Suqami, and Mohamed Atta (according to 9/11 commissioner, Bob Kerrey, AA would likely have known that Mohammed Atta was a member of al Qaeda). Betty Ong, another stewardess, told a reservations manager and a senior AA official in Dallas that two flight staff had been stabbed and a passenger in 9B had had his throat slit (Israeli Daniel Lewin).

Amy Sweeney also relayed that the hijackers had showed her a bomb having red and yellow wires. And that they had used mace and pepper spray. All of which raises the question how these got past security. The bomb (if it was that), would unlikely have gotten by as hand luggage so it must have been put on the plane by someone else. And the FBI, in a later meeting with the four 9/11 New Jersey widows, said that the terrorists had used gas masks of some kind. How did they get on board?

So by 8:20am United Airlines officials knew absolutely that middle eastern terrorists had hijacked Flight 11, killed people and had a bomb on board. There was no confusion here. Recall, also, that the Presidential Security Service monitored FAA radar in real time and saw exactly what the FAA operators saw. They would have known it was a hijacking by 8:20am.

Flight 11's Captain John Ogonowski was a strong man and a Vietnam veteran. He allowed FAA staff to listen to the hijackers (in fact, they taped them) by pressing a "push-to-talk button" on the control yoke. "We have more planes, we have other planes," said one of the hijackers, before Flight 11 hit the North Tower at 8.45am.

So by some time shortly after 8:30am the FAA had good reason to believe from the terrorists themselves that multiple planes had been hijacked by Islamic terrorists. Are we to believe that the Presidential Security Service did not become aware of this fact about the same time? Or that at 9:00am Pres.Bush could imagine that Flight 11's crash into the North Tower was due to "one bad pilot"? Or that when he was told about the second crash at 9:05 he could possibly believe this was anything other than a terrorist attack? And yet he remained in that classroom for another 25 minutes while half the world watched it all unfold before their eyes.

The 9/11 Commission failed to interview Michael Woodward and the narrative offered by Amy Sweeney in her last 23 minutes of life was not included in the 9/11 commission's hearing on aviation security.

Remember the story that 9/11 was pulled off with box cutters? In fact, investigators for the commission found that box cutters were reported on only one plane. They were illegal in any case and would not have got past check in security. But no-one is answering these questions.

And Flight 93? Forget about the three different crash times. Explain the story of the drinks trolley, the one the passengers used as a battering ram in their last moments in an attempt to enter the cockpit. Can't be done, says Melody Homer, former flight attendant and wife of Flight 93's first officer, LeRoy Homer. The aisles are narrow and only one person would have been able to get behind it. Four hijackers in the cockpit could easily have blocked its entry.

And so it goes. The official account of 9/11 is riddled with holes. Gas masks on Flight 11, red bandanas on Flight 93, box cutters everywhere except in the official 9/11 report, bombs that magically whisk themselves on to planes, and high level US security officials who seem deaf, dumb and blind to what was going on even when the hijackers told them what they were doing and who they were.

9/11 was America's Reichstag fire.

Anonymous said...

Just to be clear: Flight 11 was American Airlines, not United Airlines, as I wrongly mentioned in one place. Apologies.

Unknown said...

Damien sez...

How did they get on board?

And, witd regard to Flight 77, Hani Hanjour did not even have a ticket. How --indeed --did they get on board?

And yet he remained in that classroom for another 25 minutes while half the world watched it all unfold before their eyes.

Keeping in mind that, by his 'admission' later, he had ALREADY seen the first plane crash the first tower. That was, of course, impossible UNLESS his criminal admin knew of the attacks and had closed circuit set up SO THAT he could have seen it.

Are we to believe that ... when he was told about the second crash at 9:05 he could possibly believe this was anything other than a terrorist attack? And yet he remained in that classroom for another 25 minutes while half the world watched it all unfold before their eyes.

Well, as you know, Damien, I have long ago stopped believing any part of the official 'theory'. Efforts to plug up the holes creates more holes exponentially. better to just start from scratch.

And Flight 93? Forget about the three different crash times. Explain the story of the drinks trolley, the one the passengers used as a battering ram in their last moments in an attempt to enter the cockpit. Can't be done, says Melody Homer, former flight attendant and wife of Flight 93's first officer, LeRoy Homer. The aisles are narrow and only one person would have been able to get behind it. Four hijackers in the cockpit could easily have blocked its entry.

You would think that if you are going to do to all the trouble of committing mass murder, sedition, and high treason, you would --at least --cook up something that could not be so easily and utterly shattered!

The official account of 9/11 is riddled with holes. Gas masks on Flight 11, red bandanas on Flight 93, box cutters everywhere except in the official 9/11 report, bombs that magically whisk themselves on to planes, and high level US security officials who seem deaf, dumb and blind to what was going on even when the hijackers told them what they were doing and who they were.

9/11 was America's Reichstag fire.

Indeed, it was, damien. I oppose a summary execution of Bush. He should be found guilty first of the charges of high treason, mass murder, obstruction of justice and numerous others. A single conviction on a single count of a capital would be enough to rid the world of this vermin.

Anonymous said...

"Better to just start from scratch",

Like how George W. Bush became the 43th President of the US, and why!

When the Neo-Cons made public their Plan for a 'New American Century' in 1998, they had everything in place, the people (Cheney, Rumsfeld etc.), logistics, military build-up, strategies inclusive a 'new Pearl-Harbor', how to reform the justice department, smoke and mirror deniability and so on, except a President they could rely on. I remember the first Bush when he promised 'A new World Order', so maby it was first intended that he, Bush the elder, would be 'The Executive' to start things going. However, he lost the Presidency to Bill Clinton (who could not be trusted to order the crimes needed for their schemes) so they had to wait, although they tried anything and everything to shorten their waiting trying to get Bill Clinton impeached and out of ofice, they had to wait till the presidential election of 2000, and the new president 'had to be George W. Bush', son of the father who promised a New World Order.

And so they worked their schemes to steal the 2000 presidential election and legalized that election scam through the US High Court.

I imagine the Neo-Cons who constructed 'PNAC Conspiracy' approached George W. Bush first through his father, who they trusted, and made it clear that he could become (made man, maffia-style) the next US President after Clinton, and so they made him a 'business proposition' under sworn (skull and bones?) secrecy!

Of course they knew G.W. Bush, as their president, had limited intellectual and governing skills, so much the better they must have thought, and therefore (I think) they let him in on their (9/11) scheme on a limited 'need to know' basis like; Okay George, once you're in office we'll set our 'PNAC' plan in motion, everything is organised to the detail and clear to go, so you must from then on be aware that 'a terror attack' on US soil can materialize, we keep from you the details of exactly how and when, for obvious reasons, and because we want a genuine horror and disbeleave expression on your face to be shown to the media.

Maby this is more a gut-feeling than an hypothesis, I know, But seeing re-run after re-run of G.W. Bush's facial expression in that classroom when briefed about the terror-attack, convinced me 'rather more than less' that Georgie was kept out of the loop while the real perpetrators behind the scene, such as Dick Cheney, by 'unbeleavable coïncidence' directed that very day a counter-terror exercise in wich he send all available USAF interceptor fighter-jets out of the dissaster area.

During his 8 years as 'Made President' of the US, it became rather clear to me that Georgie was the perfect Neo-Con prop-man who, in a sane and moral just political environment, never would have had the slightest chance of becoming President of the US. The other mind-boggling aspect of the 2000 presidential election is that Al Gore gave in almost without a fight, that's very puzzeling to me.

Anyhow, for the US to re-gain its standing in the World, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, ect. ect. and the whole Neo-Con PNAC cabal should be prosecuted for War Crimes and Mass Murder!


Unknown said...

Anonymous said...

When the Neo-Cons made public their Plan for a 'New American Century' in 1998, they had everything in place, the people (Cheney, Rumsfeld etc.), logistics, military build-up, strategies inclusive a 'new Pearl-Harbor', how to reform the justice department, smoke and mirror deniability and so on, except a President they could rely on. I remember the first Bush when he promised 'A new World Order', so maby it was first intended that he, Bush the elder, would be 'The Executive' to start things going.

You've nailed it. I, likewise, vividly remember when the Sr Bush made his 'New World Order' references. Having met this man on several occassions, it sent shivers down my spine.

I am still shocked and surprised that Bush Jr actually left the White House. I kept waiting for another 'terrorist attack' or some other pretext by which he would declare a national emergency, cancel the elections, declare martial law, secure the borders of DC, and ring the White House with tanks, missiles, and anti-aircraft batteries. I believe something went terribly wrong inside the JUNTA and it was not merely the financial crisis.

Anonymous said...

You're so right, Yakov. No-one would have trusted bozo Bush with anything much less the details of 9/11. I think he knew a staged attack was planned on the day and had to play a part. His primary role was to stay at the school as long as possible to create a public appearance that authorities first only became aware of the attacks, or made sense of them, after 9.00am. That provided the propaganda cover for the failure of US air defenses. In fact, (see my post above) officials knew multiple hijackings were taking place by al Qaeda from 8:30am. There are reasonable grounds for believing that Bush may have been subject to mock assassination attempts in an effort to convey the message to him to shut up and play along -- or else! Also, Cheney, Rumsfeld and others may have actually considered such an attempt.

At 6am on the morning of 9/11 four Arabs rolled up at Sarasota where Bush was staying and attempted to obtain an interview. (This was a ruse similar to that used just two days earlier to assassinate the Taliban's chief opponent, Ahmad Shah Massoud, a popular nationalist Afghan leader with Russian sympathies who would have been the US's least desirable ruler of Afghanistan. The decision to invade Afghanistan was supposedly only thought up after 9/11. The US invaded and they got their preferred choice, Hamid Kharzi. A stroke of luck, eh?) Anyhow, they were referred to the Public Relations Office in Washington. They disappear from the 9/11 narrative shortly after. There was also some arab guys in Sarasota on 9/11, possibly Moroccan, driving around in a white van yelling "God is Great". These too disappear from the public narrative. You would have thought these details were beyond coincidence on that day and you'd be right. Since these were almost certainly not from al Qaeda that points to other players. Also, even ignorant Arabs would know they have bugger all chance of getting near the President posing as unknown journalists which suggests even more that this was a staged incident to provide supporting evidence if an assassination attempt were to take place from a different source.

Hopsicker has an interesting report of a Sarasota resident, Zainlabdeen Omer, who contacted local police the night before the attack. Omer said that a friend of his named "Ghandi" who had made violent threats against the President in the past had just arrived in Sarasota and he was concerned that he might be there to kill him. The Secret Service was notified and nothing came of it. "Ghandi" turned out to be a member of the Sudanese People’s Liberation Army, a group hostile to al Qaeda. At any rate, Omer, "Ghandi" and several mates all disappeared after 9/11. Hopsicker claims that the released name "Ghandi" is not the real name but "Al- Ghamdi", the same first name of three of the 9/11 terrorists whose driver's licenses gave their home address as Pensacola Naval Air Base! (You gotta just love this bullshit 9/11 story, don't you).

Bush was told early on not to return to Washington because someone (supposedly al Qaeda) had obtained high security access codes to the phone line for Air Force One and that an anonymous call had said: "Air Force One is next." It's a patently nonsense claim but it provided a public reason for Bush to stay out of Washington, and a private reminder from others that his health was at stake if he returned. AF1 took off without fighter cover at 9:40 am which is disturbing because (1) the security service made early attempts to move Bush at 9:05 providing plenty of time to get air cover; (2) fighter air force bases were less than 200 miles away and on alert; (3) at the Italian G8 summit in July 2001 the skies were patrolled by US fighter aircraft because Egypt had warned of a threat by islamic terrorists to assassinate Bush and other Western leaders with "an airplane stuffed with explosives"; (4) in the weeks prior to 9/11, 24-hour fighter cover was placed over the President's ranch in Crawford, Texas.

There's another propaganda link that could have been used by those who might have assassinated Bush. Just three nights before he arrived at the swank Colony Resort on Longboat Key on the evening of Sept 10, Mohamed Atta was staying at a slightly-less tony hotel just two miles down the beach, according to eyewitnesses who contacted the FBI in the immediate aftermath of the attack. The same beach where Bush was known to take lengthy early morning jogs.

I think the evidence is there that Bush was always an expendable bit player in the 9/11 attacks.

Behind all this is not so much New World Order but a coalition of essentially criminal elements of the US hard Right. There's an interesting Atta conversation reported here:

After being stung in an argument with his one-time American girlfriend about which of their cultures was the most barbaric, Mohamed Atta boasted, “There are many rich people who fund what we do.”

“He said there was someone in Florida—some rich Arab—who had a lot of money,” Amada Keller recalled. “He asked me, ‘Are you aware that when we come over here, your people pay to have us set up businesses?’”

“Eventually, he told me, his people were going to try to take over this country,” Keller continued. “He said: ‘I’ve been in this country many times before. I can come in and go as I please.”

Atta's close associates in Florida were Germans, not Arabs. The closest was Wolfgang Bohringer (Atta called him 'my brother') who had arrived in the US in the 1990s and opened up an illegal Florida flight school. He was also the personal pilot for a major Eastern European Mafia figure named Victor Kozeny who was involved in drug-trafficking and high level US corporate fraud. When arrested in the South Pacific in Nov 2006 Bohringer claimed that he couldn't be arrested and that he was working for the CIA.

Despite being an unexceptional engineering student in Egypt, for at least four years Atta studied in Germany under a privately run US-German sponsorship program with connections to conservative US figures. Atta arrived in the US on a student visa obtained outside the country that specified Huffman Aviation, one of 200 flight schools in Florida. It was owned by Oryx Investments, an investment holding company formed in Dubai by Adnan Khashoggi, Sheik Kamal Adham, director of Saudi intelligence (1963-79), and Wallace J. Hilliard. Huffman was a US sponsored drug trafficking flight centre. As recently as April 2006 a DC9 fitted out with Dept.Homeland Security look alike signage was captured in Mexico containing 5.5 tons of cocaine. No prosecutions followed. The company owning the plane had a sister aircraft that was housed at -- wait for it -- Huffman Aviation.

Hilliard had business involvements with Mark Shubin, who worked for the CIA as a pilot. He had business involvements with Ken Good:

"Good had been one of Neil Bush’s cronies in the Silverado Savings and Loan debacle. Kenneth Good was a big part of the Silverado Savings and Loan collapse. He was in business with Neil Bush. In fact, Ken Good had been so clearly a Bush family retainer that it strained credulity to think that Shubin—and Wally Hilliard—now were not similarly connected."

Atta was a patsy, Bush was a puppet. Both were groomed for their roles. We are dealing here with a Right wing criminal network whose aims are criminal and for whom politics is a means to an end: the installation of a permanent Right wing government with police state powers, global expansion through war, illegal drugs and arms trafficking and the looting of public coffers.

I hope you can excuse the length here, Len. I thought a potted history and a few links might be helpful to some of your readers.

Superb Jon said...

Investigate, try and jail the Albanian Heroine Gang of Bob Dole, Joe Dioguardi and Dwayne Andreas for letting Al Qaeda in the door.