Sunday, September 20, 2009

Why the 911 Truth Movement 'Cannot be Stopped'

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

There remains probable cause to indict and charge top officials, George W. Bush himself, for the crimes we call '911'. And, last time I checked, there was no 'statute of limitation' on mass murder, war crimes [see: US Codes, Title 18, Section 2441] or high treason!

The evidence against Bush, Cheney and a gang of NEOCON crooks will prove in court that Bushco conspired to attack and invade Iraq for its oil! It will not help the defense that documents of Cheney's meeting of his 'Energy Task Force' survive and prove that the Cheney and 'big oil' literally carved up the oil fields of Iraq before Bush would have the pretext he needed to attack, invade, and loot oil!
Earlier this year a BBC Newsnight report claimed to have uncovered documents showing the Bush administration made plans to secure Iraqi oil even before the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the US. Based on its analysis of PSAs in seven countries, it said multinationals would seek rates of return on their investment from 42 to 162 per cent, far in excess of typical 12 per cent rates.

--American And British Oil Companies Ready To Carve Up Iraqi Oil Fields
As Hitler needed a Reichstag Fire, Bushco needed a pretext --a 'catalyzing event' that the Project for the New American Century would compare to Pearl Harbor. [See Rebuilding America's Defenses; toward the end of this PDF document you will find a picutre of the US Global Hawk which, I believe was 'the missile', as Rumsfeld called it, that hit 'this building' as Rumsfeld referred to the Pentagon!]

Bush conspired with 'rich men' --his elite base --in order to perpetrate the capital crimes of aggressive war, mass murder and high treason!
On this eighth anniversary of the tragic events of 9/11. the movement of concerned citizens who do not believe the U.S. government’s official explanation of those events (the clear majority in poll after poll after poll) only continues to grow, emboldened by breathrough after breakthrough in their efforts to bring the glaring inaccuracies of that official explanation to the attention of the general public.

Perhaps no greater sign of the success of the 9/11 Truth movement can be found than the fact that the discredited corporate media has begun another round of ferocious and transparent hit pieces designed to sling mud at those seeking real answers to the still-unanswered questions of the victims’ family members and real justice for the first responders who are dying as a direct result of government lies. From Psychology Todays ridiculous hit piece insisting that skepticism about government explanations is a form of insanity to National Geographic firing explosives into a fiberglass chicken coop, it seems that the corporate media is becoming more and more desperate (and even downright comical) in their attempts to stop people from questioning the very 9/11 commission that has been called a fraud by six of its own commissioners.

Most of these attacks on 9/11 end up focusing not on the evidence itself, but on one inevitable question: “Why do ‘conspiracy theorists’ believe what they believe?” Of course, this question is coming from the self-same media conglomerates who speak in unanimity against 9/11 Truth and then wonder why newspapers are going the way of the dodo and people are turning off the TV in droves, so we can assume the question is either disingenous or that the corporate media bigwigs are, shall we say, intellectually challenged.

--James Corbett, The Corbett Report
The biggest hole in the official theories is the fact that there is absolutely no forensic evidence supporting the Bush conspiracy theory. Certainly --no airliner wreckage was recovered in New York and the surviving steel was ordered destroyed by Bush but not before traces of thermate were recovered and subsequently tested, analyzed and confirmed. The presence of thermate is very nearly the smoking gun. Without thermate, the steel girders of WTC would never have weakened, collapsed or melted as they were, in fact, photographed.

WTC 7 is another fatal flaw, a nail in the Bushco coffin. WTC 7 was not struck by any airliner of any size. It was seen standing behind a BBC correspondent even as she reported its collapse. Clearly --she had gotten the official 'release' but screwed up by reporting this planned event before it, in fact, occurred. The fall of WTC 7, never struck by airliners, is a classic example of a controlled demolition.

At the Pentagon, only one engine rotor was found --not the two that would have survived to be recovered had an airliner struck the Pentagon. Moreover, the only rotor found was about one third the size of two rotors that would have been recovered had a 757 struck the Pentagon. There was no fuselage, no airliner wreckage! Unless the laws of the conservation of matter and energy have been repealed, a 757 weighing some 80 tons or more would have left behind just that much debris. Certainly, the small of amount of debris might have been carried off in wheelbarrows.

Desperate 'officialists' concede that no airliner fuselage was found. It 'vaporized', they 'explain'. Nonsense! The fuselage is of aluminum and according to every scientific, official or university source I have found, aluminum will not 'vaporize' at temperatures less than 11000 degrees F. According to NASA, 11000 degrees F is 1000 degrees hotter than the surface of the sun. So --you can rule that out!

Officialists also claim that DNA testing confirmed both passenger and 'hijacker' IDs. There are at least two things wrong with that assertion: 1) there are NO Arab names on the official autopsy report released to Dr. Olmsted in response to his FOIA; 2) if the fuselage vaporized as is claimed, then no DNA IDs would have been possible. DNA is often said to decompose when heated but, in fact, the effect is even worse: it literally melts. As heat is applied, bonds that join the two nucleotide strands may break.
The two molecules [nucleotides] are stabilized in this structure due to noncovalent bonds, mostly hydrogen bonds and vanderWaals forces. These bonds are not strong; accordingly, when the temperature rises sufficiently, the double helix is said to "melt" into its two component molecules, and will reassociate upon slow cooling under appropriate salt conditions. So, the issue is not decomposition so much as disassociation upon exposure to too high a temperature; and the reason for the disassociation is that the energy input of the heat overcomes the ability of the noncovalent bonds to keep the molecules together.

--US Energy Department, Molecular Biology Archive, DNA Decomposition
At the 11000 degrees F required to 'vaporize' the fuselage, I dare say no DNA would have survived, no DNA ids would have been possible at all. So --which is it? Did the fuselage vaporize or not? Were the DNA ids performed or not? The officialists simply cannot have it both ways.

The truth, however, explains everything. Lies explain nothing. The truth is: no airliner struck the Pentagon. The only 'official autopsy report' known to exist was released to Dr. Olmsted via his FOIA request. There were NO ARABS on the list!

Take the case of Flight 93. Saeed Alghamdi has been protesting his innocence of 911 since the event. If Saeed were guilty, he would be dead! If Saeed were guilty he would have been blown to smithereens over PA. A dead Saeed might be evidence of Bush's theory. Alive, he is living proof that Bush's official conspiracy theory is a pack of black hearted lies that have harmed the American people, the world and, most certainly, the cause of peace.

Bush is the primary suspect for several reasons:
  • Those who lie about crimes do so to cover up guilt. Bush has never told the truth about 911.
  • Bush has not merely lied; he has actively, consistently and deliberately tried to cover up the crime of 911 with overt and identifiable instances of obstruction of justice, lies, and overt intimidation. This --I believe --is persuasive evidence of his guilt and/or complicity.
Tim Roemer let the cat out of the bag when, like Donald Rumsfeld, he referred to a 'missile' that struck the Pentagon. And that, I believe, is the truth that Bush would cover up and lie about.

If Bush had been innocent of the crime, he would have ordered every scrap to be placed in evidence. Instead, he obstructed justice by ordering destroyed the evidence of mass murder an high treason. If Bush had been innocent, why would he have ordered the destruction of evidence that might have proved his innocence in court? Within months of WTC collapse, tons of metal from the collapsed towers were sold to scrap yards in New Jersey where it was then sold to recyclers in the US and overseas. As the recent discovery of thermate proves, every shred, every scrap of 911 metal was evidence which, if examined, might have explained the collapse or pointed an accusing, indicting finger! Perhaps it is that last fact that explains the haste with which this 'evidence' was destroyed.

If Bush were innocent, then why would he have ordered the destruction of evidence that might have exonerated him? The only answer is that Bush is not innocent and ordered the destruction of evidence that would, in fact, prove his guilt of the crimes of mass murder and high treason against the sovereign people of the United States, the Constitution, US Criminal Codes and every moral code known to mankind since leaving the caves and savannahs.

Let's get on with the trials. Let's bring the guilty bastards to justice! There is no future until the demons of the past are dealt with, resolved and put to rest. No future is promising that is built upon a foundation of lies, high treason and the mass murder of US citizens by its own government.

See also: A Challenge to American Journalism

This just in:
[US officials, Congressmen, State and Defense Dept. officials Bribed for Nuclear Secrets! Can you say wide spread high treason in the US Government? ]
Broke the news on air tonight. 4,000 word cover story on FBI translator turned whistleblower Sibel Edmonds in The American Conservative to hit stands and web tomorrow, by former CIA agent Phil Giraldi.

We'll pick this up tomorrow after I get a look at it. You East Coasters will likely beat me to it. But here's the teaser from TAC...:
There’s a new issue of The American Conservative going to press today, and it includes a story that will make more than a few congressmen and foreign lobbyists intensely uncomfortable: an in-depth interview between Phil Giraldi and FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds. She tells us exactly how Turkish intelligence have penetrated national secrets, suborned government officials, and blackmailed Congress. It’s going to be explosive.

Good. Rightwingers are covering it. So hopefully that means the "liberal media" will now pay attention!

UPDATE 9/18/09 1:15pm PT: Sibel posted the cover over at her site, and I've added it above. She also notes that the story is currently online available online to subscribers only until Monday when they'll release "a major press release" along with the print version out the same day. The story should then be available to all online on Tuesday.

The cover title: "Whose Afraid of Sibel Edmonds?: The gagged FBI whistleblower on espionage, al-Qaeda, and secrets for sale"

In an email she just sent me just now, she notes: "We've been getting foreign
MSM inquiries; tons. Zilch here; so far..."

Not much of a surprise by now. After all, what U.S. media would possibly care about members of the U.S. Congress and high-ranking State and Defense Dept. officials taking bribes, being blackmailed, and enabling the theft and sale of U.S. nuclear secrets? Even if the allegations came under sworn and video-taped deposition by a former FBI translator who overheard such things first hand. Non-story, apparently.

--Explosive' Sibel Edmonds Cover Story at 'The American Conservative'


911, War, and Paul O'Neill

13 comments:

David Slesinger said...

Great work. Glad to see a person of your media background coming forward so strongly. Please consider helping with our efforts to honor Barry Jennings. We're doing bannering with the banner reading just, "JenningsMystery.com" at media outlets. Because its a human interest story, it is less likely to be dismissed by those who have an excuse not to look at the evidence. We'll have a conference call Tuesday September 22 to plan bannering at journalism schools and independently owned newspapers. Can you help find a list of such papers? Get in touch if you can help.

Anonymous said...

Hello, Mr. Hart

This is a representative of the JREF Forums.

I have read your ideas on 9/11, and i feel that they are interesting. Interesting enough that i feel that maybe you could air your opinion on 9/11 on the Conspiracy theories subform. If the people on the JREF forums agree with your conclusions, it will boost your creidbility.

Link:

http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=64

What say thee?

Anonymous said...

The only I fear about the 911 truth movement is their calling for an investigation. Calling to the very institution that pulled it off - the government. You cannot have a meaningful, independently conducted investigation if the government is involved. The fox investigating the killings in the hen house isn't exactly unbiased and THAT is what I fear most out of the 911 truth movement - the possibility of them saying "ok" to the govenment reopening the whitewash...I mean investigation.

Len Hart said...

David Slesinger sez...

Please consider helping with our efforts to honor Barry Jennings. We're doing bannering with the banner reading just, "JenningsMystery.com" at media outlets.

Thanks for the links to the Jennings 'story'. Indeed, this aspect of the 911 story is given too little attention. I plead guilty, having concentrated what little 'fire power' I have on the biggest, most blatant lies, an achilles heel that would --it is hoped --bring down the house of cards.

Anonymous sez...

Calling to the very institution that pulled it off - the government. You cannot have a meaningful, independently conducted investigation if the government is involved.

No --I do not favor another kiss up 'special prosecutor' beholden to 'government'. In previous articles I have URGED, IMPORTUNED, PLEADED, COERCED SHORT OF THREATENING any Federal Judge worth his/her salt CONVENE upon his/her own motion a FEDERAL GRAND JURY to bring indictments against George W. Bush, Dick Cheney et al upon 1) the verifiable probable cause that is now found in the public records; 2) the testimony of witnesses which ANY Federal Grand Jury has the authority to subpoena. These witnesses can be COMPELLED to testify upon the threat of being found in contempt, possibly 'obstruction of justice'.

We don' need no steenkin bureaucracy. WE NEED AN HONEST JUDGE!

Len Hart said...

A representative of the JREF Forums sez...

I have read your ideas on 9/11, and i feel that they are interesting. Interesting enough that i feel that maybe you could air your opinion on 9/11 on the Conspiracy theories subform.

I respectfully decline but thanks anyway.

I was dissapointed with the ad hominem use of 'truther'. If I want this kind of abuse, I will wither it here, thanks.

The use of 'truther' is as obnoxious and odious as the words 'nigger', 'darkie' or 'wog' in other contexts.

It subverts debate, perhaps intentionally. Thanks to that and similar tactics the 'truth' about 911 may never be known. That, of course, was the intent of whatever malevolent 'evil doer' coined 'truther', 'twofer', 'troofer', et al.

At last, the more interesting JREF thread posed the question: Is mathematics invented or discovered?

Clearly - it was invented. Your forum asked: did Euler discover or invent this relation between Pi and the natural integers ?

We cannot ascribe to the 'integers' a physical existence; therefore, the 'relation' describes an artifact of a 'formal system', i.e, mathematics itself.

If 'aliens' from another world should ever be discovered and/or communicated with, it would be instructive to learn if their mathematical systems have the alien equivalent of 'primes' or, for that matter, any other concept which we may believe is purely mathematical and/or abstract.

Anonymous said...

John F Kennedy Junior Murder & Egyptair 990

by Andy Law

I was involved in the investigations. One of the perpetrators in both of these tragedies, which were not accidents, was identified. He was a CIA officer from 1974 until the "Halloween Massacre of 1979" when he was laid off, moved to Israel, and went to work for the Mossad, utilizing the right of return to become an Israeli citizen.

The "MO" with EA 990 was drugging and hypnotizing Batouti, the Egyptair 990 copilot, at the Hotel Pennsylvania in NYC, where El Al also stayed. A "manchurian candidate". Although not in the accident report, you can google to find there were 33 high ranking Egyptian Military officers on board, including Generals - returning home from a training excercise.

In the article below, you will surmise that an EMP weapon was used on Kennedy - probably employing microwaves. I am attaching a photo of what it might look like - this is not it. It was probably pitched over the side of the "fishing boat" described below. The fisherman were Israelis, they got away. This was Plan B. Plan A was "MK ULTRA" (as above) on copilot/friend that kennedy invited along but he did did not committ. They discussed the route, date, and time on a tapped phone. The "treatment" gives steps - 1-2-3-4-5- and there is a trigger word or event. The drugs are amnestic so the target has no idea what he is about to do.

The Kennedy records are sealed until 2029 I was told - a gag order of some kind - State Secrets Act perhaps

NEW ARTICLE:

From Wayne Madsen Report “From Deep Inside The Washington Beltway”

August 12, 2009

READ IT HERE:
http://rfkjrnews.com/about/

scroll down just a little to "skipper"

Len Hart said...

Anonymous said...

Fascinating piece Len, but you leave out the major involvement of the Mossad - as many of the 911"investigators" are "controlling the dissent by leading it". Best example is Alex Jones - a google of him with "zionist" flushes out his staff and advertisers.

I didn't leave it out... it was simply not the topic of the moment. I don't think it possible to deal with every aspect of this heinous crime. Better to focus and excise like a laser.

Few people read articles longer than 200 words --thus is explanied the rise of twitter et al.

Even in the sixties, a magazine article of 5,000 words was conidered long, perhaps too long.

Secondly, propositions to the effect that MOSSAD were involved in 911 are not necessarily incompatible with anything I've written.

The Jewish Lobby is surely the most powerful lobby on K-Street. Some have claimed that the Jewish Lobby owns the US. To pick a nit, it is CHINA which literally OWNS the US and Israel exercises GREAT INFLUENCE on every branch of the US government.

Anonymous sez...

you will surmise that an EMP weapon was used on Kennedy - probably employing microwaves.

Well....I don't know anything about that and --worse --I don't know how it could ever be proven.

I do know that the fatal shot came from behind the picket fence on the Grassy Knoll.

CE-399 --obviously a'throw down', cannot be even be placed at the scene of the crime. Had Oswald gone to trial, he would have WALKED.

And later --TALKED!

The can of worms would have been exposed by any vigorous defense with the power of subpoena. The GOVERNMENT simply could not permit any trial that would have aired the dirty laundry.

There were tree, perhaps four primary motives for the murder of JFK. Three of them are dealt with in one of my articles on this site.

Anonymous said...

Good point about the label, "truthers".
Distractions from the basics seems to be what I continuously run into on sites exploring these crimes.
What was really done in those buildings when the big refit was done?
How is it that the insurance paid off double for the buildings when the claim was taken to court? (Sweet deal).
Simplicity is key- how is it that three modern skyscrapers failed in the same day when none had ever failed before?
As to finding an honest judge, good luck with that. I am reminded of the crap Garrison was put through when he attempted to investigate the JFK killing.
The questions are blatantly obvious, the answers seem to be too painful for most of the teevee zombies to accept.It's like finding out that Washington did not cut down the cherry tree, or that there is no God.
Stick to your guns, Cowboy.
Donald L. Smith

Will said...

Re: JFK jr. and EMP weapon. See the Wayne Madsen article. We are trying to prove it now. We hope to have some of the FBI investigators who were told to "back off" and "feared for their lives" come forward and reopen the case with the supressed evidence of a massive electromagnetic event.

The weapons have been around for a long time, developed by DARPA and also a unit for Law enforcement was developed which disables a vehicle ignition -stalling the engine avoiding a high speed chase.

Who did the coverup? Eli M Rosenbaum, director at DoJ. Lew Shiliro, assistant special agent in charge - NYC, G Charles Rasner, FBI and Dr. Bernard Loeb, of NTSB.

damien said...

Even the conservative American Spectator is wising up: Bin Laden is dead and has been since 2001.

Len Hart said...

Don Smith sez...

As to finding an honest judge, good luck with that. I am reminded of the crap Garrison was put through when he attempted to investigate the JFK killing.

That's an excellent analogy, Don. I am now convinced that the 'usual suspects' murdered JFK and the 'usual suspects' are CIA in the case of JFK, certainly CIA/MOssad the case of 911. Garrison had guts and a statue to him should be built when and IF New Orleans is ever rebuilt. My kudos, as well, to Oliver Stone who had the guts and the star power to buck a conservative Hollywood infrastructure that, some say, was never the same after the McCarthy witch hunts.

As for the Cherry Tree --I am an atheist; I don't believe George Washington exists : )

Will sez...

Re: JFK jr. and EMP weapon. See the Wayne Madsen article. We are trying to prove it now

Interesting! Keep us posted! I'll find out what I can on this end, as well.

Damien sez...

Even the conservative American Spectator is wising up: Bin Laden is dead and has been since 2001.

Binny was supposed to have died toward the end of December 2001. I'm betting he died in the same Dubai hospital in which he was visited by two CIA spooks prior to 911. Tora Bora, my ass!

This entire episode has re-confirmed my believe that P.T. Barnum was absolutely correct: you can fool some of the people ALL of the time! The US government is CHEAP FREAK SHOW!

LanceThruster said...

As one of the ranks of the godless, it was upsetting to me that secular humanist skeptics group CFI-West hosted uncritically, 9/11 "investigator" Ronald Hamburger. The presentation topic "Conspiracy or Science:
Why Did the Towers Fall?" (see: http://cfiwest.org/calendar/Hamburger.htm )The general feedback that I got was that many saw him as fairly convincing (I was unable to attend), though I was told there were a number of persistent challengers to his assertions.

I do not have a problem with my skeptics group putting the burden of proof on the one making the assertion as they do with astrology, or ESP, or whatever...but it seemed as if they were out to give Mr. Hamburger credibility that was not warranted (his supposed credentials be damned).

Seems further checks on Mr. Hamburger only reinforced that view. It seems to me an easy thing to dismiss much of the paranormal claims as having no basis due to the failure by their proponents to demonstrate or replicate them in a controlled environment. But these seem shortcomings exist with the official narrative Mr. Hamburger put forth.

Skeptics group or not, just because something seems far-fetched is not enough in itself to dismiss it outright, and the claims made ought to also be demonstrable. The computer simulations were questionable as they were loaded with so many presumptions and fudge factors to be clearly seen as purposely intent on misdirection.

It is my hope if the truth is ever actually acknowledged (seems the truth of what *couldn't* have happened as per the official narrative *has* been established), that the entire skeptics organization look at their own epistemology and identify how something so glaringly apparent was not recognized.

Unfortunately as my lawyer friend says when someone puts forth an unsupported contention as fact (as when I told him about a campus prof that did a lecture "debunking" Oliver Stone's "JFK" - specifically with regards to the "magic bullet"), "They're either stupid, or liars...and I don't think they're stupid."

see: http://www.whodidit.org/cocon.html

Ronald Hamburger — structural engineer and Senior Principal at Simpson Gumpertz and Heger consulting engineers in San Francisco; was a principal author of FEMA’s initial report on the collapse of the twin towers; later a key participant in the flawed NIST report on why the WTC buildings collapsed


I am glad that he is countered by other building professionals from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (see: http://www.ae911truth.org/ )

Daniel Edd Bland III said...

Want to wake up American's to the truth of 9/11? Here's how......

http://blandyland.com/?p=388

Make it go viral! Thanks!

Daniel Bland