Unlike 911, Lockerbie was investigated but, like 911, the case is obviously not solved. It it was Mossad, according to Time, which issued the first 'tip' that a bomb had been placed among the luggage. That may be sufficient grounds for reasonable suspicion. Mossad, after all, is probably second only to the US CIA among the world's largest 'official' terrorist organizations!
Memorial services were held to mark the 20th anniversary of the crash of Pan Am 103 near Lockerbie, Scotland. Like 911, 'Lockerbie', an alleged 'terrorist' attack named for the nearby township, raises more questions than are answered. But there is one important difference. In Lockerbie there is identifiable wreckage. In New York and at the Pentagon, the laws of physics --we are expected to believe --were suspended! In Lockerbie, southern Scotland, eleven people were killed when large sections of aircraft fell on, in and around the township, bringing total fatalities to 270. Many have called it the 'Lockerbie bombing'. Unlike 911, Lockerbie was investigated but, like 911, the case is obviously not solved.
- Precisely how a rogue bag containing the bomb eluded the Frankfurt airport security system is still not known.
- If bomb-laden luggage replaced an innocent bag, what happened to the displaced suitcase?
- It so happened that the flight from Berlin to Frankfurt was delayed. While all the passengers ultimately made the connection to London, 11 suitcases, including the pilot's two bags, remained behind in Frankfurt. They were entered into the airport computer system and rerouted via the Pan Am flight. But only one of the pilot's suitcases was recovered at Lockerbie. The other had been mysteriously left behind in Frankfurt, and arrived safely in Seattle a day later. That story, which TIME has corroborated, doesn't prove Pan Am's claim that terrorists used al-Kassar's drug pipeline to pull a suitcase switch in Frankfurt. But it does support the theory that a rogue bag was inserted into the automated baggage-control system, as the secret FBI report indicates was possible. --Time
George Bush's [Bush I] letter of condolence, written almost four months after the shattered remains of Pan Am Flight 103 fell on Lockerbie, Scotland, on Dec. 21, 1988, expressed the usual "my heart goes out to you" sorrow. "No action by this government can restore the loss you have suffered," he concluded. But deep inside, Mrs. McKee suspects it was a government action gone horribly awry that indirectly led to her only son's death. "I've never been satisfied at ( all by what the people in Washington told me," she says.Today, as the U.S. spearheads the U.N.-sanctioned embargo against Libya for not handing over two suspects in the bombing, Mrs. McKee wonders if Chuck's background contains the secret of why this plane was targeted. If her suspicions are correct, Washington may not be telling the entire story. Major Charles Dennis McKee, called "Tiny" by his Army intelligence friends, was a burly giant and a superstar in just about every kind of commando training offered to American military personnel. He completed the rugged Airborne and Ranger schools, graduated first in his class from the Special Forces qualification course, and served with the Green Berets. In Beirut he was identified merely as a military attache assigned to the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). But his hulking physique didn't fit such a low- profile diplomatic post. Friends there remember him as a "walking arsenal" of guns and knives. His real assignment reportedly was to work with the CIA in reconnoitering the American hostages in Lebanon and then, if feasible, to lead a daring raid that would rescue them.McKee's thick, 37-page Army dossier contains so many blacked-out words that it's hard to glean the danger he faced. Surviving the censor's ink was his title, "Team Chief." Under "Evaluation," it was written that he "performs constantly in the highest-stress environment with clear operational judgment and demeanor . . . Especially strong in accomplishing the mission with minimal guidance and supervision . . . Continues to perform one of the most hazardous and demanding jobs in the Army."For Beulah McKee the mystery deepened six months after Chuck's death, when she received a letter from another U.S. agent in Beirut. It was signed "John Carpenter," a name the Pentagon says it can't further identify. Although the letter claimed that Chuck's presence on the Pan Am plane was unrelated to the bombing, Carpenter's message only stirred her suspicions. "I cannot comment on Chuck's work," he wrote, "because his work lives on. God willing, in time his labors will bear fruit and you will learn the true story of his heroism and courage."A four-month investigation by Time has disclosed evidence that raises new questions about the case. Among the discoveries:The wreckage found near Lockerbie is clearly traceable to a specific flight. The aircraft was largely re-assembled. By contrast, 'scraps' left behind on 911 were hurriedly disposed of by executive order of George W. Bush. No attempt was made to investigate the crime. It was, rather, covered up. At the Pentagon, the glaring lack of wreckage was 'explained away'. The fuselage of Flight 77, we are told, vaporized. Aluminum does not vaporize at temperatures less than 11000 degree F, according to NASA some 1000 degrees hotter than the surface of the sun. In any case, the dead were said to have been DNA id'd! But DNA literally 'melts' at temperatures well under 500 degrees F. So --which is it? Did the fuselage vaporize OR were the bodies identified via DNA. It cannot be both ways.Jibril and his group may have targeted that flight because on board was an intelligence team led by Charles McKee, whose job was to find and rescue the hostages.--Pan Am 103: Why Did They Die
- According to an FBI field report from Germany, the suitcase originating in Malta that supposedly contained the bomb may not have been transferred to Pan Am Flight 103 in Frankfurt, as charged in the indictment of the two Libyans. Instead, the bomb-laden bag may have been substituted in Frankfurt for an innocent piece of luggage.
- The rogue bag may have been placed on board the plane by Jibril's group with the help of Monzer al-Kassar, a Syrian drug dealer who was cooperating with the U.S.'s Drug Enforcement Administration in a drug sting operation. Al- Kassar thus may have been playing both sides of the fence.
Willful destruction of evidence is a crime and those ordering it should be prosecuted! Moreover, it is my belief that only those guilty of a crime are sufficiently motivated to order the destruction of admissible evidence that might surely convict them of the crimes of mass murder and high treason. Bush Jr, should you happen to read this while surfing the net, you know who and what you are! I defy anyone to produce a scrap, a shred of Pentagon wreckage traceable to Flight 77. Secondly, I defy anyone to produce a scrap of admissible evidence that any Arab hijacker was ever on board. Certainly, there are no Arab names whatsoever on the ONLY official document of Flight 77 passengers and that is the official autopsy report released to Dr. Olmsted in response to his FOIA request. I have never had any reason --compelling or otherwise --to believe a word of Bush's 'official conspiracy theory' of 911. No aspect of this conspiracy theory can be believed. No part of it is credible. While it is time to fully investigate the events of 911, it might be advisable to begin a wider inquiry: why are there more terrorist attacks against US interests during GOP regimes than Democratic at least since the assumption of the office of President by Ronald Reagan? I'm waiting for a credible story from any Republican holding public office or supporting GOP officials holding any office in the nation!
13 comments:
Good article. Keep 'em coming.
While Lockerbie is down on my list of US Terrorism stunts, it is nonetheless ON the list.
Love the pentagon missile debris.
Amerikagulag
Hi Len,
concerning the "flight 77" lie, what is never, ever mentioned, is the fact that THREE engines should be found. All modern airliners are equipped with the main engines AND an APU in the tail section. The size if the main rotor "found" at the Pentagon is approx 1/3 the size of a 757-200 rotor. If this had ever been in an aircraft, it would have been part of the APU.
Turbine engine components, landing struts, brake hardware, and hydraulic actuators are the hardest components of any aircraft, and they do not simply "vaporize" on impact.
What also remains unanswered is the condition of the building as seen before the collapse of that section affecvted. Looking at photographs of the building and the impact area, one can judge where the wings and main engines would have impacted, yet, inexplicably, one sees windows intact, and no evidence of engine impact.
The entire official story is a lie, believable only to idiots, psychopaths, and those for whom it is simply too painful to accept the horrible truth their gut is screaming at them.
The US Bureau of Transport Statistics keeps records on the flights of commercial planes.
An FOI request showed up that three of the 9/11 flights were out of service for a full year prior to 9/11 for no apparent reason.
All three of them were hijacked on their very first day back at work. What are the chances? Keep in mind that commercial aircraft need to be run to pay off their expensive costs. Yet for a whole year they were apparently idle. This is a farce!
About Flight 77 the Transport Statistics Board provided no FOI information whatsoever. Apparently they have no records about this plane at all prior to 9/11.
This is a sad, sick joke. The murder of innocents in broad daylight and the American people are not entitled to the most basic answers to the most basic questions. What a disgrace!
We can yell until we're blue in the face but nothing will ever change.
Obama signed the historic hate-crimes bill but he also signed another bill that effectively makes it against the law the release of torture photos.
We're under the control of the military/industrial complex and I don't see any changes in the foreseeable future.
Unchange we can believe in.
Re: Amerikagulag sez...
Love the pentagon missile debris.
I the engine rotor depicted, I am quite sure, is NOT any part of a 757 APU but was left behind as a US Global Hawk struck the Pentagon.
If an airliner weighing some 60-80 tons struck the Pentagon, some 60-80 tons of debris would have been left behind. The amt of debris left behind at the Pentagon might have been carted off in a few wheelbarrows or perhaps a crate covered by the blue tarpaulin that keep prying eyes from determining its TRUE origin.
damien sez...
An FOI request showed up that three of the 9/11 flights were out of service for a full year prior to 9/11 for no apparent reason.
Thanks damien. Glad to see that you are still on the job exposing this hoax. I am still hopeful that a 'citizen's committee' will track down the BUSH CRIME FAMILY and all their MURDEROUS ACCOMPLICES and bring them to justice.
Crazy Liberal said...
Obama signed the historic hate-crimes bill but he also signed another bill that effectively makes it against the law the release of torture photos.
The photos already released and widely disseminated depict deaths resulting from the procedures. If the US had EVER intended to obsrve the rule of law, the GUILTY FUCKERS who did this would have already been executed. We are talking about CAPITAL CRIMES under US Codes. And that applies to BUSH who ordered both the war and the crimes that followed.
Missles have engine rotors?
Anonymous said...
Missles have engine rotors?
The US Global Hawk does. You're looking a pic of one on the article.
Generally --rockets do not have rotors. But the US Global Hawk is NOT a rocket but a turbo-jet. It is completely remote controlled and flew from CA to Australia completely by remote control.
Google: U.S. Global Hawk, specifications...
you'll get tons of stuff PLUS the usual wiki.
IMAGE SEARCH GOOGLE: U.S. Global Hawk, specifications, rotor
You'll get PIX of the rotors AND the one that you see on this article.
BTW --the US Global Hawk is a PAY-LOAD carrying missile.
And the US can put it almost anywhere withing a radius of more than a thousand miles (or even more) as evidenced by its flight to Aussie land.
Think of it --the US plugs in the coordinates, pushes a button and ASSASSINATION/MURDER is automated.
I believe that you will find cut-away drawings to scale showing the ROTORS on the U.S. Global Hawk.
William sez...
The size if the main rotor "found" at the Pentagon is approx 1/3 the size of a 757-200 rotor. If this had ever been in an aircraft, it would have been part of the APU.
Indeed, it is about 1/3 the size of TWO TITANIUM/STEEL ALLOY rotors that would have LIKEWISE survived the mere kerosene fires.
If an ALUMINUM fuselage did not vaporize, neither would have ALL THREE of the 757 rotors to which you refer.
And I suspect that TITANIUM/ALLOY will withstand even hotter temps before it vaporizes without a trace.
Sherlock Holmes said: "When you have eliminated the impossble then whatever remains however implausible must be correct'!
What is correct and fits the KNOWN facts is this: a US GLOBAL HAWK was programmed to strike the Pentagon. It carried a conventional payload --not a nuclear one. It left behind a 'smoking gun', an engine rotor that would have been traceable and, had the case gone to court, would have helped establish the prima facie case against the Bush crime syndicate of Bush, Cheney, Rummie, Rice, Myers, various Pentagon Brass and Bush partisans inside the CIA. Recall --that Bush Sr was, at one time, director of the CIA and there is evidence he had connection there even earlier.
All this evidence was removed and ordered destroyed by 'usual suspects' who might have been CONVICTED by it!
With regard to the 'Lockerbie bombing' I'm a bit surprised, that apart from initially, the time of departure from Heathrow Airport of Pan Am 103 does not appear to have been highlighted. Pan Am 103 was due to take-off from Heathrow at 18:00 Hrs (GMT) but did not do so until 18:25 Hrs (GMT).
I can recall press coverage at the time mentioning this fact and that if the bomb was set with a timer and Pan Am 103 had departed on time it would have been over the Atlantic when the bomb exploded. There would have been no wreckage, or very little, to be recovered.
Mr. Hart,
The Global Hawk is a UAV, not a missile. It's used to LAUNCH missiles, it's not a missile itself.
Just pointing that out.
Anonymous said...
The Global Hawk is a UAV, not a missile. It's used to LAUNCH missiles, it's not a missile itself.
It IS missile in that it may carry a payload and that is consistent with your own arbitrary defintion,.
I use the term 'missile' to denote anything that is propelled by expelling exhaust --whether it be 'jet' or the strict use of the term 'rocket' in which the method of oxidation is contained within the body of the MISSILE itself!!! Comprende???
Secondly, both 'missiles' and 'rockets' are propelled by expelling stuff out their back ends as described by the equations and principles articulated by Sir Issac Newton. You have heard of him, I presume!!!!!!!!!
Now --secondly, the GLOBAL HAWK is commonly called a missile by military personnel, journalists et al. If you have a problem with that, I suggest you convene a world wide conference and get them straightened out.
Otherwise, if you have nothing of substance to say: SHUT THE FUCK UP!
At lat --as the GLOBAL HAWK may carry a PAYLOAD, I will fucking calling it a MISSILE if I damn well please!
FUCK OFF!
Post a Comment