The word 'manipulate' was used by Edward Bernays to describe how big corporations, like BP and Exxon, should harness the 'organized habits and opinions of the masses'. Bernays considered such 'manipulation' to be essential in a democratic society. BP's recent oil spill --now threatening the U.S. Gulf Coast, indeed, the entire Gulf of Mexico --is an occasion in which corporations will apply the principle of 'manipulation' referred to by Bernays.
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation [emphasis mine, LH] of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. --Edward BernaysOver a period of some thirty years or more, the 'manipulation' of the media has become a growth industry. As one might expect, a pioneer 'consulting firm' is located in the Houston suburb of Sugar Land, TX. Ammerman Enterprises 'trains' executives from huge firms like Exxon, Shell, DuPont, HCA, Humana et al. The 'executives' and other corporate kiss-ups are taught what we would call 'spin' and 'propaganda' techniques most of which are especially applicable in 'crisis' situations of which the BP 'spill' is a corporatist's [fascist's] worst nightmare come true.
It was Ammerman Enterprises which 'trained' Exxon executives with respect to the Exxon Valdez. What we call 'spin' and PR, consultants call 'bridging' --a fancy, 'corporate' word for 'let's talk about something else' or 'I don't wanna talk about that; let's talk about this!' Another technique goes beyond mere bridging; it is a complete 'paradigm shift'! Done well, a hapless or cub reporter may not even notice.
Thousands of business and other professionals have chosen The Ammerman Experience's Effective Media Communications workshop in order to learn the skills needed to deal successfully with the media. In this small-group session you will learn:The First Amendment, I believe, granted the right of free speech to real people --not mere legal abstractions, non-persons, artificial entities! The U.S. Supreme Court, dominated by five corporate-biased ideologues, think otherwise though it is anyone's guess how idiots like Scalia or Roberts managed to conclude so fallaciously, with such overt bias toward what St. Thomas More in fact called a 'conspiracy of rich men'. More's description remains the best description of the modern corporation.It is 'real' people --not 'legal abstractions', mere words on paper --that are most harmed by 'corporate personhood' and the crimes against both nature and humanity that have resulted! In the Elizabethan era, 'companies' operated via a 'charter' granted by the sovereign. Doing business was not a 'right' but 'privilege' and a displeased Queen could revoke the privilege at will. I wonder if Elizabeth would have, by this time, revoked the right of BP to do business.Who Should Attend This workshop is appropriate for anyone who may have to deal with the media.
- How to be interviewed.
- What is required before, during and after an interview.
- How to get your points into an interview.
- The most common (and damaging) media traps.
- What reporters want to know and why.
- How important perceptions are to your reputation.
- How to handle the communications aspects of a crisis situation.
Practical Learning
This is a skills-development workshop, not a lecture on concepts. As our firm's name suggests, the training we provide is experiential. We use simulated environments, including tough, experienced journalists. Some features of this workshop are:--The Ammerman Experience
- Instructors and role players with extensive media experience.
- Three television interviews.
- Two crisis news conferences with multiple reporters.
- Each exercise is videotaped and critiqued in an open forum by the instructor.
I can perceive nothing but a certain conspiracy of rich men procuring their own commodities under the name and title of the commonwealth.They invent and devise all means and crafts, first how to keep safely, without fear of losing, that they have unjustly gathered together, and next how to hire and abuse the work and labour of the poor for as little money as may be. These devices, when the rich men have decreed to be kept and observed for the commonwealth's sake, that is to say for the wealth also of the poor people, then they be made laws. But these most wicked and vicious men, when they have by their insatiable covetousness divided among themselves all those things, which would have sufficed all men, yet how far be they from the wealth and felicity of the Utopian commonwealth? Out of the which, in that all the desire of money with the use of thereof is utterly secluded and banished, how great a heap of cares is cut away! How great an occasion of wickedness and mischief is plucked up by the roots!Sir Thomas More (1478 - 1535), Utopia, Of the Religions in UtopiaI am among those who believe that it is time to restore the 'corporate death penalty' by seizing the assets of BP and prosecuting whatever management is guilty of criminal negligence and/or malfeasance of any type. Seizing BP effectively ends that company's existence as a corporation. Any assets remaining after damages are paid must be controllable by the public and in the public interest. The current management is put out of a job and where crimes are found --prosecuted.
Media Conglomerates, Mergers, Concentration of Ownership
8 comments:
Sometimes I put on my backpack and hit the trail for a few days. Sitting alone on a hill in the middle of nowhere watching the sun go down while downing a bowl of Ramen and tuna kind of re-centers one. Our priorities are so far removed from where they should be. Ed Bernays and his predecessors totally rule our reality.They control every part of our lives.Our priorities should be:Turn off the TV,learn to play an instrument, decriminalize marijuana, get back to the soil, go backpacking, and love our enemies.Romans 12:20
anonymous sez...
Our priorities should be:Turn off the TV,learn to play an instrument, decriminalize marijuana...
I'm with you! Just as corporations are 'artificial' people, our lifestyles have become unreal, our values false, our careers destructive and phony!
And we barely notice that we have been swimming in a toxic sludge of media lies for decades now. Just to give you some idea, today's Murdoch-owned lead Aussie newspaper, The Australian, has the following bilge water items:
(1) New sanctions against Iran are great (oh, and Turkey and Iran are becoming good buddies and uppity Middle East players). -- That's US-Israeli payback for Turkey brokering a recent nuclear processing deal with Iran that the US first sponsored and then rejected! And for Turkey having the cheek to complain when Israel killed nine people on the Mavi Marmara, six of them shot in the back or the back of the head!
(2) Turkey allowed 40 terrorists (HIH)on the Mavi Marmara who were planning confrontation as a propaganda exercise(yeah, some "terrorists" -- they took no weapons!)
(3) Europe is in debt and the only solution is low wages and "fiscal responsibility." (Let's not mention that in the early 1990's Argentina saved itself from this garbage by repudiating its foreign debts and the economy boomed within two years).
(4) The local Goldman Sachs affiliate says a $1 billion Aussie action against NY Goldman Sachs for selling it toxic investments designed to fail had "no merit".
Wall to wall Murdoch, wall to wall crap. And that's just today! If we listened to these arseholes we would just hand over our wallets and stand around waiting to be shot or shipped off to some mercenary war somewhere conjured out of the latest Lie of The Day against the latest Enemy of The People.
Wall to wall crap and, sadly, unstoppable short of global war or depression.
damien sez...
And we barely notice that we have been swimming in a toxic sludge of media lies for decades now.
'Ain't' THAT the truth?? Damn! What have we done to our only world.
I used to love the study of astronomy and astro-physics. These days, however, it only makes me feel lonely and utterly insignificant when 'homo sapien' seems hellbent on destroying the ONLY world we will ever have in a cosmos more vast than anything we can imagine.
Wall to wall crap and, sadly, unstoppable short of global war or depression.
If we were smart, there would still be time to save planet! Alas! We are not smart!
Great to see your comments, Damien.
Hi Len, great work you're doing here, as always.
re:
>>I am among those who believe
>>that it is time to restore
>>the 'corporate death penalty' by
>>seizing the assets of BP
I wholeheartedly agree. And I'm sure a majority of the American people would agree. And a lot of powerful Dem politicians would agree, too.
But I also believe there is absolutely zero chance of this ever happening.
Why?
Because powerful corporations like ExxonMobil would fiercely oppose it.
One might ask: why on earth would ExxonMobil oppose what would amount to the elimination of one of their biggest competitors?
The reason is that they'd be scared sh*tless that it would set a dangerous precedent.
Therefore, it will never happen.
The likes of corporate giants like ExxonMobil wield the real power in America. Anything they want, they get.
Let's face it, only a true people's revolution will ever put a stop to the oligarchy that rules America.
Marc McDonald said...
Because powerful corporations like ExxonMobil would fiercely oppose it.
You're absolutely right! If BP can be seized out of existence, so, too, all the other corporate 'persons'. The hypocrisy of the whole thing is that REAL 'real' people --as opposed to PHONY 'real' people (corporations) --are subject to the rule of law.
ERGO: whatever SCOTUS may 'mouth', corporations cannot, in fact, be both a 'person' and a 'privileged non-person abstraction' at the same time.
That recent SCOTUS decision has turned out to be the best example of 1) corporate bias 2) right wing hypocrisy 3) the utter ruthless dishonesty with which this 'mentality' is willing to stoop to advance its fascists agenda.
"In the Elizabethan era, 'companies' operated via a 'charter' granted by the sovereign. Doing business was not a 'right' but 'privilege' and a displeased Queen could revoke the privilege at will. I wonder if Elizabeth would have, by this time, revoked the right of BP to do business. "
These comments underline my view that seize BP campaign has anti-British.
BP is 40% American. It does have roots in Britain, but then so do many Americans. It is a global multi-national company and no longer British.
For me the BP is a mugging by the American public, but it is a campaign won on racism against British people.
I am sure if BP had been an American company, it would not have been mugged.
For me, I want BP to pay for all the oil spill, but the seize BP campaign was won in a nasty way.
The day I see American companies brought to account in the same manner I will say there is justice in America. Just look at the Bhopal disaster in India. Why has Ombama done nothing about this?
Anonymous said...
These comments underline my view that seize BP campaign has anti-British.
If you think that was 'anti-British', you're an idiot! I was, in fact, making the point that in Elizabethan England, a 'corporation' was --in fact --subject to what we might today call a 'corporate death penalty'. 'Corporations' were 'privileged' but should you piss off the 'sovereign' you are subject to a 'corporate death penalty'. corporations today have no such fear.
I repeat: there are FEW corporations of any significance today that can be identified with a particular country. BP, for example, is all over Houston. A visitor from Mars might have thought it was a Houston corporation.
At last --getting all 'patriotic' about BP is naive if not misinformed. BP is just another FUCKIN corporation --no worse, no better than EXXON. By the way, SHELL has a huge building in downtown Houston. And, as I recall, a slightly smaller building in London. So --you tell me --is SHELL an AMERICAN CROOK or is it a BRITISH CROOK?
You believe the criticism of BP is anti-British, posting the following:
BP is 40% American. It does have roots in Britain, but then so do many Americans. It is a global multi-national company and no longer British.
That it is 40 percent American merely proves my point and, in NO WAY, influences my remarks about BP.
If I were debating this issue, I would cite those numbers to prove the point that CORPORATIONS are no longer to be identified with nations, that they are --in fact --multi-national as I have already said. Thanks for the stats. It just proves my point.
Now --peddle this crazy ass idea that the criticism of BP is anti-British elsewhere before I BECOME anti-British.
Now --if you wish to read an anti-'country' article, read my expose of how the state of ISRAEL supports a LOBBY on K-Street in Washington D.C. that has literally bought the government of the United States. Call me anti Isreali. Call me anti American.
Secondly, if Britain, as a nation, is insulted because I dare to point out the crookedness of BP, then BRITAIN should read my critiques of the U.S. government, especially under the rule of one George W. bush --a congenital idiot, a goddamned liar, war monger, TOOL of big corporations not unlike Exxon or BP et al.
For me, I want BP to pay for all the oil spill, but the seize BP campaign was won in a nasty way.
I don t think you understand that some of the damage may be irreparable.
Poor BP! I'm getting all teary-eyed! I used to consult big companies including Shell, Exxon et al. I 'coached' Shell Prez John Bookout personally. I can tell you that the experience was completely disillusioning. I am no fan of CORPORATIONS of any sort. The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision granting these mere 'legal abstractions' the rights that both British and American philosophers had said belonged to PEOPLE is BLOODY ABSURD, stupid and will prove, IS proving to be harmful, perhaps fatal in its effects.
Screw BP! Work to develop alternative, clean energy!
Post a Comment