Tuesday, September 02, 2008

How McCain's Palin Pick Makes 'Age' Issue Number One

McCain's choice was motivated by the fact that 'age' had already become an issue and he hoped to blunt it. If McCain had chosen well, it might have been unfair to ask: what if the old codger should die in office? Now, it is irresponsible NOT to ask that question. McCain's Palin pick --focus group designed to blunt the criticism in the bud --has backfired. The campaign is now all about age.

A wise choice for McCain would have been someone with proven experience and moderate politics. Had McCain made such a choice, the 'age issue' would have been blunted, perhaps taken off the table entirely. Instead, McCain blundered before getting off the blocks, a first bad decision that may be chalked up to age and the age issue.

What kind of 'President' would the extremist Palin become? A Palin presidency is simply unthinkable. Certainly --she would never have risen to prominence so quickly were not McCain concerned about age. Instead of putting the issue to rest, he has put it on the front burner.

As an extremist, Palin makes Goldwater look moderate. She is a denier of global warming, a doctrinaire opponent of a women's pro-creative rights, a proponent of enforced teaching of creationism. McCain's death could hasten a new dark age.

Let's look at the record of the person who might very well be put in the position of leading the United States of America.
  • She was elected Alaska's governor a little over a year and a half ago. Her previous office was mayor of Wasilla, a small town outside Anchorage. She has no foreign policy experience.

  • Palin is strongly anti-choice, opposing abortion even in the case of rape or incest.

  • She supported right-wing extremist Pat Buchanan for president in 2000.

  • Palin thinks creationism (theology --NOT science) should be taught in public schools

  • She's doesn't think humans are the cause of climate change.

  • She's solidly in line with John McCain's "Big Oil first" energy policy. She's pushed hard for more oil drilling and says renewables won't be ready for years. She also sued the Bush administration for listing polar bears as an endangered species—she was worried it would interfere with more oil drilling in Alaska.

  • How closely did John McCain vet this choice? He met Sarah Palin once at a meeting. They spoke a second time, last Sunday, when he called her about being vice-president. Then he offered her the position. [h/t Ron Foster]
Some quick notes about the issues involved should a right wing extremist assume the nation's highest office upon the death of senile President.

Neither creationism nor 'intelligent design' is science. Both are slick PR approved versions of 'religious' theology'. Constitutionally, folk can teach their children anything they want --at home! But the Constitutional separation of Church and State makes the teaching or propagation of 'religion' at tax payer expense unlawful. That is the standard that must also be applied to so-called 'Faith Based Initiatives'.

Like the evil hackers who try to 'sneak' malicious programs onto your computer, the axis of creationism/ID cloaked creationism to disguise their religious ideology, to make it appear to be science when in fact it was and remains religious dogma. It was hoped that as 'science', religious ideology could be taught stealthily in publicly financed schools at your expense. You would pick up the tab though you do not believe it.

Palin's big oil policies conform to the GOP party line. With Her assumption of the nation's highest office upon the death of an aging McCain, the big oil cabals will not merely retain but consolidate their ownership of the nation. They own her. Now --what does that make her?

At last, her extremist, anti-freedom, anti-people, anti-environment positions may expose her pro-hypocrisy agenda.

Sarah Palin's 17 y/o daughter Bristol is pregnant. Pass it on.

There is no truth to the rumor, however, that Palin's four month-old child with Down Syndrome is Bristol's daughter.

The McCain campaign is saying that McCain already knew about the blessed event before he made his running mate choice eight days ago. If that's true, then it seems to suggest that McCain really is as ethically blind as he proved during the Keating 5 scandal. But somehow, I doubt that McCain would've been in possession of information that intimate. According to John Cole at Balloon Juice, Camp McCain hasn't even begun vetting her, yet.

CNN reports that Palin's child with child will keep the baby and marry the father, as if making such a decision while still in high school bespeaks Christian family values. Naturally, the Palins are insisting on everybody respecting their privacy (Read: Don't write or speak about it).

You know, like the GOP would've respected Chelsea Clinton's privacy if she'd gotten knocked up in her junior year of high school.

--Family Values
As Lloyd Bentsen famously chided Dan Quayle --"You are NO John Kennedy" --we might remind John McCain: "You are no Ronald Reagan":
Reagan at his age was much more graceful. McCain's shoulders are stiff and painful from years of North Vietnamese torture, and he doesn't deliver a speech that well.

At the instinctive level with the contrast between McCain the stove up old codger and Obama's lithe articulate just old enough youthfulness, it's no contest. The ideological pros and cons of the people McCain considered have been done to death. But how about this totally non-ideological analysis:

McCain/Lieberman--two old farts. Sure losers against Obama.

McCain/Romney-- no chemistry, makes McCain look old, Romney himself is classy but sort of a stiff.

McCain/Pawlenty-- another lose/lose proposition. Pawlenty points up McCain's age without bringing much pizazz.

--A different take on the Palin choice
The GOP is literally owned by big oil. The GOP, therefore, must be anti-environment, pro Iraq war, pro-Bush dictatorship. By picking Palin, McCain proves that he is anything but a 'maverick'. McCain is not his own man. McCain is hardly a 'straight-talker'; his words are vetted by the robber barons of big oil. McCain is just another GOP kiss up to the Military/Industrial establishment --the folk who bought you Viet Nam and Iraq. If you like George W. Bush, then vote for John McCain and get Bush's third term!

The Palin Choice is so bad that one is justified in asking if McCain is already showing signs of senility. Was he influenced by what he might think is a pretty face hiding an extremist, right wing mentality? This choice smacks of desperation. Reams of GOP propaganda in its wake have kept many a flack, many a paid liar employed. McCain has proven that he been bought and paid for by the folk who OWN the GOP. Maverick, my ass!

Essential reading:
American essayist Gore Vidal says that despite the US claim that it is making the world safer by perpetuating democracy, the country never had any democracy.

In an exclusive interview with Press Tv correspondent, Vidal said that the United States has never had democracy and the word never was used in the US constitution, Bill of Rights or the Declaration of Independence.

Vidal also said that America has fallen into the hands of a small group of people that only care about global dominance and making money from US tax payers by waging wars.

The renowned essayist made the analogy that the democratic national convention in Denver is symbolic of a falling empire and observed that the hyper expensive entertainment-based campaigns and the current state of the US as being overextended in multiple wars and no budget surplus to finance them, all bode ill for that nation's future.

Vidal noted that despite Obama's promise to deliver universal heath care, the heath industry would oppose his plan and insure he will not be able to deliver on his stated goal.

When asked about US policy toward Iran by the rival candidates, Vidal responded that McCain is a warmonger that will likely wage war on Iran.

Gore Vidal: US never had democracy
More about Palin from Democracy Now:
Max Blumenthal of The Nation reports: Last week, while the media focused almost obsessively on the DNC’s spectacle in Denver, the country’s most influential conservatives met quietly at a hotel in downtown Minneapolis to get to know Sarah Palin. The assembled were members of the Council for National Policy, an ultra-secretive cabal that networks wealthy right-wing donors together with top conservative operatives to plan long-term movement strategy.

--Report: Secretive Right-Wing Group Vetted McCain’s VP Candidate Sarah Palin
Additional resources:

Published Articles

Subscribe



GoogleYahoo!AOLBloglines

Download DivX

Add to Technorati Favorites

, , ,

Spread the word

yahoo icerocket pubsub newsvine

Thursday, August 28, 2008

'Don't let the door hit you in your sorry ass on your way out!': Americans bid 'farewell' to the worst US 'President' ever!!

The blog, Farewell 43, gives Americans a chance to bid George W. Bush 'farewell'. I think they really mean: GOOD RIDDANCE!

Visit them and post your own 'good riddance' message. Let the very worst frickin' "President" in American history know what you really think.

Following is the test of my 'good riddance' message. Post your own on their site. Here's a link to my comment on Farewell43! See also: Oh, Blessed Day!

Hey George

I would hope the nation you leave behind 'fares well'. You're on your own! Good riddance to you and your slimy ilk!

I am a fourth generation native Texan. My ancestors were in Texas before the railroad. You brought shame and disgrace to the state. You are NO Texan! You're a carpetbagger.

I will not mourn if I never again see your repulsive mug or hear your whiny voice --characterized as it is by a phony Texas accent which you affect. Leave Texas. Go back to Connecticut if Connecticut will have you.

You won't have the Oval Office to hide out in anymore. With any luck and a good federal prosecutor, you may learn what life is like on the lamb or --better --in a federal lock up run by one of the sub-contractors so favored by your GOP locusts.

You once said "The Constitution is just a goddamned piece of paper!" Perhaps, when you wake up one day to find yourself charged with mass murder and other capital crimes, you will learn to love the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in the same way that the profligate embrace the Bible. Many who share your dubious mindset have had such predictable epiphanies inside dull, gray cells.

You said that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. He didn't! You lied.

You once said "Bring it on!" Tell that to an honest Federal judge.

You encouraged the American people to believe there were connections between Iraq and 911. There were none. You lied!

You said: "This would be a helluva lot easier if this was a dictatorship"! Then you tried to make it one. For the sake of the nation and the world, I hope you failed!

You claimed you won the 'Trifecta'! Perhaps you call a 'trifecta' 1) America's status as an aggressor nation, 2) its bananna republic status, 3) its collapsing economy due solely to your economic incompetence and utter stupidity.

You said "I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family". You lied!

You said: "Our enemies .. never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." The lasting harm you inflicted upon our Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the economy is your lasting legacy.

Because YOU lied, over one million civilians in Iraq are dead, many are the result of direct combat like the war crimes perpetrated upon Fallujah -- a heinous crime not unlike the Nazi liquidation of Lidice. It would be fitting if your 'Presidential Library' be housed inside a Holocaust Museum.

There is a Holocaust Museum in Houston. But it's doubtful that it would bother to make room for your crap.

Upon a pack of evil, malicious bald-faced lies and deliberate fabrications, you sent US 'servicemen' into battle against a nation that was never, ever in any way at any time a 'threat' to the US. You lied! US soldiers died by the thousands. They are still mired in Iraq a phony war which will 'live in infamy'.

You represented the selfish, venal interests of just one percent of the nation. You favored them with tax cuts even as you threatened the Social Security that is essential to everyone but your favored few. 'God bless the child that's got his own!'

You were NOT elected. You stole the office.

You did your best to ruin the nation. Your robber baron constituents must be very happy. But with any luck, they will soon be out of luck, as well.

I will not wish you 'good luck'. It would most surely mean 'bad luck' to wish 'good luck' upon one so irredeemably and institutionally evil as you. Tragically, you never had to make your own luck but you may soon have to live with the karma that you have sown. People like you are accustomed to simply buying their luck! With any luck, you will have run out of luck and out of office. Unfortunately for the world, there was always pappa and his cronies to bail you out. We know that you are still AWOL.

It is, rather, to the nation and the rest of the world to whom I say: "Good luck". In your wake, it will be needed. To you, I say: "May you live in interesting times!" That, by the way, is an ancient Chinese curse! Watching your defense of your capital crimes should be interesting, indeed!

There are some old Native American curses, but as you have problems with 5th grade level English, they would be utterly wasted on you. You don't deserve a good curse.


Above were my 'get lost' messages to Bush. Following are others chosen almost at random:
You royally fucked up!

Shakespeare said, “The evil men do lives after them. The good is oft interred with their bones.”

In your case, there is no good to inter. The celebration of your departure from Washington will be overshadowed by the financial and moral debt you’ve left behind.
You, George W. Bush, have done more than any single human being in the history of this country to destroy more than 200 years of American pride and progress. If you have even one shred of decency and any honesty left, you will admit publicly and beg forgiveness of the People for having been party to the theft of the 2000 election; to being guilty of war crimes; to destroying our international reputation; to having been responsible for the deaths of thousands of human beings domestically and abroad; to having had not one shred of concern or compassion for anyone outside your socio-economic status; to burdening future generations with the consequences of your actions; to having furthered the potential destruction of our planet through global warming; and to having done all this for mere power, foolish pride, greed, and money.

Good riddance, George (I don’t dare honor you with the title “Mr. President”). You, Sir, are the WORST President this country has ever seen. You are a national disgrace. We pray to recover some day from all the damage you have caused to us as a nation, and to the world.
Dear Dimbya,

You are a disgrace to this once great country! America is now hated by more people in this world than ever before! Thank you for destroying my homeland!
Hey Georgie,

Thank you for:

Two recessions.

Endless war in Iraq.

Eroding our civil liberties.

Housing foreclosures.

Bailing out corporate criminals.

Corrupting the Justice department for political gain.

Making America hated in the world.

Have a swell retirement, now that you ruined everyone else’s.

Heckuva of a job fella
You have earned your place in history.

As the possibly the dumbest president in US history, certainly the most corrupt, the most coldblooded, most consistent liar and the most arrogant sociopath this country has ever had the misfortune to deal with at such a high level.

You have made huge strides in establishing a third world OILigarchy in a first world nation, cost us the respect of the world and have gone farther than anyone in this nation’s history to destroy the Constitution of the United States which you perjuriously swore to defend.

You have destroyed the checks and balances in government, and also the regulations which kept this nation out of economic disaster since the Great Depression.

You have done more than any previous president to ensure that you successor does not have the leisure vacation time which you have granted yourself during your malfeasance in office.

If you have a hard time reading this, get your wife to help you with the big words, she used to be a teacher.
Thanks, George, for proving to all Americans and the entire world that, indeed, it CAN happen here!
You should have been Impeached. You violated the constitution and international law. You brazenly used the office as a power grab. You’ve disgraced America with your crimes. You have sanctioned torture, and should be impeached and tried for war crimes.

As of today, you have 296 days left in your occupied office. That is 296 days too many. Goodbye to the worst President in history.
H.L. Mencken [wrote],

“As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”

After 7+ years of that reality, I believe the “plain folk” of America realize that the leader of the world’s most powerful nation should be smarter than a 5th grader.
I never thought I would see a president I could not stand more than Dick Nixon. You have made my nightmare come to life. I always thought a president should be able to talk without stuttering and huhing but you have taken the English language to a new low. Please don’t let the door hit you on the way out. Bye.


Published Articles

Subscribe



GoogleYahoo!AOLBloglines

Download DivX

Add to Technorati Favorites

, , ,

Spread the word

yahoo icerocket pubsub newsvine

Big Oil Exploits High Oil Prices

'Big Oil' has already despoiled millions of acres of pristine American wilderness. It's not enough to satisfy their rapacious greed and its not enough to satisfy the American consumer who demands the right to drive absurd environmentally unfriendly vehicles like SUVs on the cheap. Everything was fine as long as the gravy train seemed endless. Everyone wants to have it both ways. Certainly --big oil would not have gotten big or bigger without a seemingly endless supply of hypocrisy. The supply of oil, by contrast, is finite.
Did you know that oil companies are already sitting on 68 million acres of leases that they aren't even drilling? Which kind of makes you wonder: Why are Big Oil and its allies suddenly desperate to get their hands on the last few places that are still protected -- our natural treasures, wildlife refuges, and pristine coastlines? They wouldn't use the concerns caused by high gas prices as an excuse to grab it ALL, would they?

--Greg Haegele, Director of Conservation, Sierra Club
Big oil is eager to exploit the situation. When consumers are 'squeezed' by high prices at the pump, dumping the SUV has not been enough. Big oil --citing high prices from which they benefited --pushes a new PR offensive with an internet campaign the Sierra Club says are outright lies.
In April and May, House and Senate committees called industry executives on the carpet for hearings, and earlier this month Congress took another run at imposing a windfall profits tax on the five major US oil companies, which together made a record $36 billion in the first quarter of 2008.

But the windfall profits bill—which also included measures to rescind some $17 billion in industry tax breaks—died a swift death in the Senate, garnering 51 votes, but not enough to overcome a filibuster. (The president also vowed to veto it.) And the hearings themselves amounted to little more than political theater, allowing members of Congress to talk tough on behalf of their suffering constituents without demanding anything that would make the lineup of oil execs—from Exxon, BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and Shell—break a sweat.

--Mother Jones, America, Over Big Oil's Barrel
Big Oil wants to drill in wilderness areas and additional areas offshore and will try to buy a Presidential candidate if that it what it takes.
Oil and gas industry executives and employees donated $1.1 million to McCain last month -- three-quarters of which came after his June 16 speech calling for an end to the ban -- compared with $116,000 in March, $283,000 in April and $208,000 in May.

McCain said the policy reversal came as a response to rising voter anger over soaring energy prices. At the time, about three-quarters of voters responding to a Washington Post-ABC News poll said prices at the pump were causing them financial hardship, the highest in surveys this decade.

Opening vast stretches of the country's coastline to oil exploration would help America eliminate its dependence on foreign oil, McCain said.

"We have untapped oil reserves of at least 21 billion barrels in the United States. But a broad federal moratorium stands in the way of energy exploration and production," he said. "It is time for the federal government to lift these restrictions."

McCain delivered the speech before heading to Texas for a series of fundraisers with energy industry executives, and the day after the speech he raised $1.3 million at a private luncheon and reception at the San Antonio Country Club, according to local news<>

"The timing was significant," said David Donnelly, the national campaigns director of the Public Campaign Action Fund, a nonpartisan campaign finance reform group that conducted the analysis of McCain's oil industry contributions. "This is a case study of how a candidate can change a policy position in the interest of raising money."

Washington Post
Americans are squeezed at the pump. Jobs are scarce, if at all, and often miles from home. Millions of Americans, through no fault of their own, have no choice but to commute long distances to jobs and, given the GOP economy, think themselves lucky to have one. At the same time, they are squeezed by high prices at the pump. Big Oil can be counted on to find an opportunity in a crisis, a silver lining that will only make them richer at your expense and that of the environment. It's not only the US that is targeted by the robber barons of big oil.
LONDON, Aug 14 (Reuters) - A race to grab land in developing countries and exploit food supply fears and payments to conserve forests could spark conflicts in areas of land disputes, development and civil rights groups say.

Investors say higher land valuations are just what's needed to settle claims which may have festered since colonial days.

But much marginal and forested land is common property, which in the past has given poor local communities little benefit from logging, mining and oil concessions.

"No-man's land and hinterland is suddenly valuable," said Andy White, coordinator for the Washington-based Rights and Resources Initiative, a development NGO.

"Communities had been told the land was theirs. Now it's contested," he said, explaining that a community in Liberia had told him that in one week they had separate visits from a mining company, a logging company and a biofuel company. "They were told by the government -- 'go out and prospect'."

--Reuters, "Green" land grab could sow seeds of new conflict
Big Oil's long-term drilling agenda is a Faustian bargain. There is only one environment. Riches today and to hell with the morrow is a fool's bargain. Big oil wants you to make it! Fact is --more drilling will neither lower the price you pay at the pump nor will it make the US energy independent. Like a druggie, this is just another short term 'fix' and only the world's richest oil companies will get even richer. Funny how it always seems to work out that way. One day, the US consumer will 'get it'!

In the meantime, The Nation, in an open letter to Barack Obama, has published some of the key points that must be addressed if the nation is ever to recover.
Here are key positions you have embraced that we believe are essential to sustaining this movement:
  • § Withdrawal from Iraq on a fixed timetable.
  • § A response to the current economic crisis that reduces the gap between the rich and the rest of us through a more progressive financial and welfare system; public investment to create jobs and repair the country's collapsing infrastructure; fair trade policies; restoration of the freedom to organize unions; and meaningful government enforcement of labor laws and regulation of industry.
  • § Universal healthcare.
  • § An environmental policy that transforms the economy by shifting billions of dollars from the consumption of fossil fuels to alternative energy sources, creating millions of green jobs.
  • § An end to the regime of torture, abuse of civil liberties and unchecked executive power that has flourished in the Bush era.
  • § A commitment to the rights of women, including the right to choose abortion and improved access to abortion and reproductive health services.
  • § A commitment to improving conditions in urban communities and ending racial inequality, including disparities in education through reform of the No Child Left Behind Act and other measures.
  • § An immigration system that treats humanely those attempting to enter the country and provides a path to citizenship for those already here.
  • § Reform of the drug laws that incarcerate hundreds of thousands who need help, not jail.
  • § Reform of the political process that reduces the influence of money and corporate lobbyists and amplifies the voices of ordinary people.

Published Articles

Subscribe



GoogleYahoo!AOLBloglines

Download DivX

Add to Technorati Favorites

, , ,

Spread the word

yahoo icerocket pubsub newsvine

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

The NIST Tries to 'Repeal' the Laws of Entropy and the First & Second Laws of Thermodynamics

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

NIST's latest theory ignores satellite thermal photos of ground zero indicating abnormally high temperatures for months after 911. The NIST theory du jour ignores this data and fails to explain it!

Under-estimating the intelligence of the American people, the NIST persists in papering over the endless holes in Bush's officiall conspiracy theories of 911. Openly declaring that its new 'report' will finish off critics of Bush's officiall conspiracy theory of 911, NIST has presumed to repeal laws of physics --the laws of entropy as well as the First & the Second Laws of Thermodynamics. Are we to expect Bush will now try repeal the equations of Galileo and Newton which describe precisely the free fall of sabotaged towers in New York? Perhaps Bush and his NEOCON co-conspirators will re-design the universe itself!
GAITHERSBURG, Md.—The fall of the 47-story World Trade Center building 7 (WTC 7) in New York City late in the afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001, was primarily due to fires, the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced today following an extensive, three-year scientific and technical building and fire safety investigation. This was the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building, the agency stated as it released for public comment its WTC investigation report and 13 recommendations for improving building and fire safety.

“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7, which were uncontrolled but otherwise similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings, caused an extraordinary event,” said NIST WTC Lead Investigator Shyam Sunder. “Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down.”

--NIST WTC 7 Investigation Finds Building Fires Caused Collapse
NIST states as fact a baseless assumption. NIST fails to address the temperatures required to melt steel and, thus, cause the collapse! The question then is not whether but when the building was prepped for demolition!

NIST ignores the fact that WTC 7 had not been struck by airliners; the fires were secondary and comparatively cool. It has never been demonstrated that WTC 7 fires were ever hot enough to have melted steel at any time. Moreover, fires cool over time. They do not get hotter when left alone. According to the First Law of Thermodynamics, an increase in the internal energy of any 'system is equal to the amount of energy added by heating the system, minus the amount lost as a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings'.
The second law is a straightforward law of physics with the consequence that, in a closed system, you can't finish any real physical process with as much useful energy as you had to start with — some is always wasted. This means that a perpetual motion machine is impossible. The second law was formulated after nineteenth century engineers noticed that heat cannot pass from a colder body to a warmer body by itself.

According to philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn, the second law was first put into words by two scientists, Rudolph Clausius and William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), using different examples, in 1850-51 (2). American quantum physicist Richard P. Feynman, however, says the French physicist Sadi Carnot discovered the second law 25 years earlier (3). That would have been before the first law, conservation of energy, was discovered! In any case, modern scientists are in agreement about the above principles.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics
The second law of thermodynamics is associated with increasing entropy, i.e, disorder. It states that in an isolated system, entropy will, over time, increase, reaching its maximum value at equilibrium. The fires inside the twin towers were never hot enough to have melted steel. The fires themselves cooled over time, never reaching or approaching temperatures required to melt steel. Something happened that should not have. Entropy was interfered with! Something was added to the equation. Giving the game away and exposing the officiall lie is the fact that unnatural heat persisted long after the buildings had long collapsed.
"This is how it's been since day one...and this is six weeks later. As we get closer to the center of this it gets hotter and hotter - it's probably 1500 degrees."

-- WMV video download (616kB)
There is no reason to suppose that anything supernatural happened at WTC 7; there is no reason to suppose that laws of physics discovered and described by William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin, Newton, Galileo et al need revision. There is reason to suspect that something highly illegal happened at WTC 7. Persistent heat patterns, observed from space are big holes in Bush's officiall theory which cannot explain them innocently. If 'thermal expansion' is to be implicated, the source of additional heat MUST be considered.

The best explanation for the collapse of WTC 7 is still the simplest --Silverstein's simple statement that the building had been 'pulled' following his discussion and agreement with firefighters. Silverstein is on video tape confirming that within minutes of his discussion with firefighters, in which it was agreed that the building be pulled, Building 7 was in fact 'pulled'. That's irrefutable.

'Thermal expansion' differs among various materials. The 'thermal expansion' co-efficient of steel can be looked up here for free! If you are willing to pay a small yearly subscription fee, you can plug that coefficient (for steel) into an 'online' calculator that will tell you precisely how much 'expansion' can be expected per degree of heat in various scales. The coefficients are one thing. Of more interest are the exponents which, as I recall, are always negative, as in negative 6. Any positive number to the power of negative six, for example, is very, very, very small. Any coefficient to a negative power is very, very, very small.

I dare say, the amount of steel expansion is microscopic if at all. It is doubtful that the miniscule expansion would have collapsed a building in a precise and symmetrical fashion which --even if it were true --assumes that the heat is evenly distributed.It is even questionable whether or not the 'expansion' would have militated against collapse rather than causing it.

Entropy is most simply a 'running down', an increase in 'disorder'. If by the use of the term 'heat expansion', the NIST implies that fires not enough to melt steel somehow got hot enough over time, the NIST is lying! Entropy is, technically, the very 'randomness of molecules' and the tendency of things to simply 'run down'. Unless energy is added, fires will cool. Perhaps energy was added. Perhaps fires were assisted.

Entropy is essential to the Second Law of Thermodynamics the second law of thermodynamics and the fundamental thermodynamic relation, which deal with physical processes and whether they occur spontaneously. Spontaneous changes, in isolated systems, occur with an increase in entropy. Spontaneous changes tend to smooth out differences in temperature, pressure, density, and chemical potential that may exist in a system, and entropy is thus a measure of how far this smoothing-out process has progressed.

'Thermal [heat] expansion' is fallaciously exploited for the purpose of explaining away with scientific sounding gobbledegook the fact that Building 7 looks like a controlled demolition. Building 7 looks like a controlled demolition because it was a controlled demolition.

NIST admitted that it hoped its 'findings' would finish off critiques of the officiall conspiracy theory! Guess again, NIST! The fight has not yet begun!

Just as I would not go to a doctor who tells me to keep on doing whatever it is that makes me sick, I would not patronize one who 'invents' a new disease because he doesn't know what it is that ails me. If NIST has not invented 'thermal expansion', it has, at least, applied it dubiously in order to paper over better and simpler explanations. For logical and scientific reasons, I like 'controlled demolition' because that's what the evidence proves happened.
Reports of molten steel in the foundations of the Twin Towers and Building 7 have been noted in the literature of skeptics of the officiall account of the building collapses. None of the officiall government reports have commented on these reports, although FEMA's Report contained an appendix disclosing evidence of mysterious high temperature corrosion of steel due to a combination of oxidation and sulfidation.

--911 Research
'Thermal expansion' does not explain the persistence of 'thermal hot spots' seen in satellite photos taken five days after the event!
Results of Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) remote sensing data and interpretations show the distribution and intensity of thermal hot spots in the area in and around the World Trade Center on September 16 and 23, 2001. Data collected on the 16th were processed, interpreted and released to emergency response teams on the 18th of September, 2001. The September 23 data were processed, interpreted and the results released on October 12, 2001. The images of the World Trade Center site show significant thermal hot spots on Sept. 16, 2001. By Sept. 23, 2001, most of the hot spots had cooled or the fires had been put out.

The AVIRIS instrument is a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) remote sensing instrument that measures upwelling spectral radiance in the visible through short-wavelength infrared. The instrument has 224 spectral channels (bands) with wavelengths from 0.37 to 2.5 microns (micrometers).

--
Heated objects may expand in miniscule amounts but heat itself runs down, cools, ice will melt. Disorder, i.e, entropy increases.
In perfect conditions the maximum temperature that can be reached by hydrocarbons such as jet fuel burning in air is 1520 F (825 C). When the World Trade Center collapsed the deeply buried fires would have been deprived of oxygen and their temperatures would have significantly decreased.

Why was the temperature at the core of "the pile" nearly 5000 F hotter than the maximum burning temperature of jet fuel a full seven days after the collapses? There were no infernos in either of the twin towers before they collapsed, so what caused the hot spots deep in their wreckage?

Dr. Frank Gayle, Metals Expert, on the jet fuel fires which burned in the WTC buildings:

"Your gut reaction would be the jet fuel is what made the fire so very intense, a lot of people figured that's what melted the steel. Indeed it didn't, the steel did not melt." [Firehouse.com]

Molten steel did not exist in the WTC buildings prior to the collapses, but...

Molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed [from WTCs 1 & 2]," Loizeaux said. He said molten steel was also found at 7 WTC, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon.

What caused the steel to melt? How did it stay molten for months after the collapses?

--What Really Happened
'Thermal expansion' of itself does not explain or support the idea that WTC 7 collapsed as a result of fire. If anything, 'thermal expansion' raises the question: what additional source of heat was required to bring about the observed collapse? Perhaps the NIST should have perused the satellite photos of ground zero. How will the NIST respond if it should be proven that airliner fires alone could not have caused both the collapse as well as the persistent thermal patterns that were observed to have persisted for weeks, perhaps months after the towers' collapse? Will the NIST, by trying to shore up the officiall conspiracy theory, be proven to have shot itself in the foot?
Note: The letter 'A' in the pic above denotes the site of WTC 7. The warmer the color the higher the residual temperature. Clearly--these heat patterns are not only NOT explained by the official conspiracy theory, they are ignored by the NIST's latest attempt to 'paper over' yet another fatal hole in officialldom.


Larry Silverstein sez HIS building was PULLED!
Listen to the ROAR of explosions that NIST says didn't happen.


Larry Silverstein dodges questions!
Like the proverbial bad penny, Lucky Larry Silverstein keeps popping up. He’s back and he’s bad again. Not content with the nearly $4.6 billion in insurance payments he received to cover his losses at the World Trade Center, he is now seeking $12.3 billion in damages from the airlines and airport security companies for the 9/11 attack in a suit filed in 2004.

Not tainted enough by the fact that Silverstein & Partners took out a lease for 99 years in July of 2001 on the WTC, two months before the attack . . . not content Larry & Partners upped the insurance at that time to $3.5 billion and (presciently) to cover potential hits by airliners flown by “terrorist hijackers” . . .

Not content that Silverstein & Partners subsequently sued the insurers for $7 billion, considering the attack a double strike because separate liners hit Towers One and Two. Not content that Larry spent the next six years in litigation with the insurance companies, only to have the deal fortunately settled, brokered by then Governor Spitzer in 2007, yielding $4.55 to Lucky Larry and Partners . . .

Not content either that his personal stake in the lease was only some $14 million, the balance supplied by his partners. Not content that he made another $500 million on the destruction of his Tower 7, which he owned and quickly rebuilt bigger and better. Not content that no liner hit Tower 7 and that the fires were out, he announced at 3:30 p.m. on 9/11 that there had been so much pain and suffering that he and the NYFD decided to “pull it” -- Tower 7 . . .

Not content that in fact at 5 p,m,, not even two hours later . . . Tower 7 went down at the freefall speed of gravity in a matter of seconds neatly into its own footprint, a classic “internal demolition.” Not content that you can’t set up an internal demolition on a 47-story steel-framed building in less than two hours or two days, or even two weeks. Not content that his “smoking gun” has attracted the attention of every 9/11 critic around the world . . .

Not content that the BBC made an incredible gaffe as a TV [journalist] of theirs, supposedly in New York, reported that Tower 7 had fallen, that is, 26 minutes before it actually fell and with a News24 “time stamp” video to prove it. Not content that even Google had to pull the video . . . Larry Silverstein, the Oliver Twist of 9/11 disaster, is back, asking for more, sir, more please. Incredible! What colossal chutzpah!

Additional resources: