The whole truth about the Reichstag fire will probably never be known. Nearly all those who knew it are now dead, most of them slain by Hitler in the months that followed. Even at Nuremberg the mystery could not be entirely unraveled, though there is enough evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the Nazis who planned the arson and carried it out for their own political ends.
From Goring's Reichstag President's Palace an underground passage, built to carry the central heating system, ran to the Reichstag building. Through this tunnel Karl Ernst, a former hotel bellhop who had become the Berlin S.A. leader, led a small detachment of storm troopers on the night of February 27 to the Reichstag, where they scattered gasoline and self-igniting chemicals and then made their way quickly back to the palace the way they had come. At the same time a half-witted Dutch Communist with a passion for arson, Marinus van der Lubbe, had made his way into the huge, darkened and to him unfamiliar building and set some small fires of his own. This feeble-minded pyromaniac was a godsend to the Nazis. He had been picked up by the S.A. a few days before after having been overheard in a bar boasting that he had attempted to set fire to several public buildings and that he was going to try the Reichstag next.
The coincidence that the Nazis had found a demented Communist arsonist who was out to do exactly what they themselves had determined to do seems incredible but is nevertheless supported by the evidence. The idea for the fire almost certainly originated with Goebbels and Goring. Hans Gisevius, an official in the Prussian Ministry of the Interior at the time, testified at Nuremberg that "it was Goebbels who first thought of setting the Reichstag on fire," and Rudolf Diels, the Gestapo chief, added in an affidavit that "Goring knew exactly how the fire was to be started" and had ordered him "to prepare, prior to the fire, a list of people who were to be arrested immediately after it." General Franz Halder, Chief of the German General Staff during the early part of World War II, recalled at Nuremberg how on one occasion Goring had boasted of his deed.--William Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich
Those who do not remember the past are condemned to relive it.Sadly, however, we always forget the past. We are in need of constant reminders, especially the corporate origins of fascism and Nazism.- George Santayana, American Philosopher
The Wannsee Conference was held on 20 January 1942, in a villa owned by the SS-Nordhav Foundation in the attractive Berlin lakeside suburb of Wannsee. It was presided over by SS-Lieutenant General Reinhard Heydrich, Chief of the Security Police and Security Service. Heydrich summoned fourteen men representing the governmental and military branches most involved in implementing the practical aspects of the Final Solution. Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring had charged him with arranging all practical matters concerning the implementation of the Final Solution of the Jewish question.1 Heydrich was an ambitious and meticulous officer who relished the responsibility of power. One of Heydrich's foremost intentions was to make sure that all these men understood perfectly what duties and responsibilities their office was expected to fulfill.In the years leading up to World War II, the phrase "Final Solution of the Jewish Problem" had taken on a series of increasingly ominous meanings in the Nazi vocabulary.2 The various implications had included voluntary emigration, confinement to ghettos in cities located along rail lines, forced removal to concentration camps, and finally, extermination. Heydrich wanted to be certain there was no confusion among the group that, now, the term referred specifically to the murder of all European Jews.A flash forward to the present day proves that despite Santayana's admonition, we have forgotten the past and we are doomed to repeat it.
Heydrich's assistant, SS Lt-Colonel Adolf Eichmann tells us in testimony at his trial in 1961, that the meeting was relatively brief, lasting only an hour to an hour and a half, and that the atmosphere of the meeting was one of cooperation and agreement.3 These high-ranking members of the Nazi government met at mid-day over a buffet luncheon to discuss the annihilation of an entire people.
We will export death and destruction to the four corners of the earth!--George W. Bush
The Existentialist Cowboy
Conservative Lies
liberals
Why Conservatives Hate America
Democrats
Bush
Spread the word:
7 comments:
Your comparison to Bush and Hitler/Nazis is excellent. As I watched the events of 9/11 happen live the first words I uttered was this is the work of Bush and Cheney.
The Bush family's love of power, corruption, war profiteering and the Nazi's is very well documented . Yet Americans continue to ignore history. This ignorance has cause the demise of our freedoms and the America we all knew post 9/11.
I fear like Hitler Bush will never face a trial.
nytexan said...
I fear like Hitler Bush will never face a trial.
thanks for posting. You are absolutely correct about the Bush family love of power et al. I share your fears about a trial. I hope we are both wrong.
I was happy to see Santanya's quote but here is my favorite of his which, as I will explain...is appropriate to Bush also:
Skepticism is the chastity of the intellect, and it is shameful to surrender it too soon or to the first comer; there is nobility in preserving it coolly and proudly through long youth, until at last, in the ripeness of instinct and discretion it can be safely exchanged for fidelity and happiness.
When September 11 happened we carelessly squandered our chastity (skepticism) and let Bush have his way with us. Our questioning of even his most outrageous claims (Osama and Saddam were in league with each other; The "smoking gun could be a mushroom shaped cloud) stopped altogether...
In short, we whored ourselves for patriotism...and we gave ourselves away at a shamefully cheap price.
sigh.....
"What did we learn Charlie Brown? What did we learn?"
hizzoner said...
we whored ourselves for patriotism
Great post, hizzoner. I wish you were wrong.
what are the chances for a neo-con military coup in 2008, do you think?
oliver south said...
what are the chances for a neo-con military coup in 2008, do you think?
The military is the only "institution" that could effect a coup. And, if anyone else tried, the military, backed up by big, souless, corporations (defense contractors) would quash it as the evil regime in China quashed Tiananmen Square.
I cannot see a good end. In the seventies, some powerful GOPs, likewise saw a "bad end" to Watergate. Nixon was convinced to resign.
Bush is cut from different cloth. The politics of brinkmanship will carry the day unless someone can convince Bush to resign. But Bush will simply dare Congress to impeach and refuse to leave when they do so. At that point, he will declare martial law and rule by decree. The Constitution, after all, is just a "goddamned piece of paper".
hello
you can put information on your blog on page'info'or'region' of
jewisheritage.fr
shalom
Post a Comment