Tuesday, February 12, 2008

The Three Irrefutable Facts That Shatter Bush's Official 911 Theory

By Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

Nothing said by Bush about 911 is true. Bush put forward a crazy conspiracy theory about a world wide conspiracy of radical Arabs and incompetent pilots. Not a word of it can be believed! Three indisputable, verifiable facts utterly disprove everything said by Bush and apologists about 911.

Bush kicked up a lot of dust and hoped to hide out in the smokescreen. It hasn't worked. Three irrefutable facts lay waste to the official lies.
  1. No 757 crashed into the Pentagon!
  2. The wings and tail are huge surfaces areas --certainly bigger than the tiny hole said by official conspiracy theorists to have been the impact point! The hole would not have accommodated the fuselage, let alone the wings and tail which might have broken off to be found on the lawn but no such wreckage was eve found. Nor was there significant damage that might have been attributed to either wings or tail section or both. Neither was there evidence of wings or tail section! Even if the plane had "shredded" --as some have claimed --"80 tons of plane is still 80 tons of debris". That is due to the "conservation of matter and energy",i.e, matter is neither created nor destroyed. An airliner weight "X pounds" (without fuel) will leave that amount in wreckage when it crashes. Airliners do not pop into other dimensions via a "wormhole" and no one has dared claim that the Pentagon was anything other than a "money hole".
    "Wings that should have been sheared off by the impact are entirely absent.
    There is also substantial evidence of debris from a much smaller jet-powered aircraft inside the building. We conclude with a high degree of certainty that no Boeing 757 struck the building. We also conclude with a substantial degree of certainty that a smaller, single-engined aircraft, roughly the size and shape of an F-16, did, in fact, strike the building."
    (Source)
    Detailed analysis of the debris field, physical damage, and other factors in the alleged impact of a Boeing 757 on the Pentagon building on the morning of September 11, 2001 reveals an almost complete absence of debris expected from such an event. (Elliott 2003) The initial (pre-collapse) hole made by the alleged impact on the ground floor of Wedge One of the building is too small to admit an entire Boeing 757. In order to decide whether or not a Boeing 757 (or aircraft of comparable size) struck the Pentagon on the morning in question, a comprehensive review of all the debris and other physical evidence is hardly necessary. It turns out that a study of the wings alone suffices for the purpose.
    ...
    The analysis presented here is based entirely on standard and/or official sources, such as the engineering report issued under the auspices of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), as directed by an army engineering officer as chair. (ASCE 2003)
    --The Missing Wings, A Comparison of actual and expected wing debris resulting from the impact of a Boeing 757 on the Pentagon building (revised Dec 19, 2004), A. K. Dewdney, G. W. Longspaugh
    We are lead to believe that not only did the 757 penetrate the outer wall, but continued on to penetrate separate internal walls totaling 9 feet of reinforced concrete. The final breach of concrete was a nearly perfectly cut circular hole (see left) in a reinforced concrete wall, with no subsequent damage to the rest of the wall. (If we are to believe that somehow this aluminum aircraft did in fact reach this sixth final wall.)
    --A Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon, Michael Meyer, Mechanical Engineer
Johnny Cochran summed it up. "If it does not fit, you must acquit!" Likewise --if there is no wreckage, then the Bush cover story utterly falls apart. When all other contingencies -the official theories and cover stories -fail to hold up under scrutiny, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. The truth is: Bushco lied about the events of 911. They did so deliberately, knowing that all was false. [See also: The Missing Wings]

Airliners could not and did not bring down the towers of the WTC! 

Fires, presumably caused by airliner crashes at the Twin Towers of WTC did not melt the steel core and could not have caused the towers' collapse let alone a symetrical collapse into the building footprint ala a controlled demolition. The fires simply were not hot enough even to have weakened steel.
The temperatures generated by a hydrocarbon-fuelled office compartment fire are not capable of melting steel. A stoichiometric combustion of kerosene, generally regarded as dodecane, for example...
C12H26 + 18.5O2 +69.595N2 ===> 12CO2 + 13H2O + 69.595N2 + 7518 kJ
...would have at best the above 7,518 kJ locked into 2.712 kg of combustion products to yield an adiabatic flame temperature (AFT) of some 2,398 K or 2,125 C (it is about 130 K less after including the inevitable endothermic dissociation reactions at these temperatures in order to reach an equilibrium state). At standard temperature and pressure, one mole of an ideal gas occupies 22.4 liters; at 2,398 K the volume would have expanded by a factor of 2398/273, i.e. nearly 9 times, to 196.8 liters/mol. The 7.518 MJ is spread amongst 94.595 moles or 18.62 cubic meters of hot gaseous products. At some 0.146 kg/m^3, these are much lighter than air at STP. In order to melt a mere 1 kg of steel that would take up a volume of only 0.127 liters, at least 1 MJ would be required. If 1/7.518 of the enthalpy (heat) in the products was directed at the kilogram of steel, the temperature rise would be reduced from 2,105 K to a little above 1,825 K which would result in a temperature of a little over 1,845 C and still potentially hot enough to melt some steel. But in real-world conditions, flame and upper layer hot gas temperatures are well below the AFT, typically barely reaching 1,000 C and certainly well below the melting point of steel.
--WTC Molten Steel: The 911 Smoking Gun
Also see: Muslims Suspend Laws of Physics

There were NO Arabs on Flight 77. 

If there were no Arabs on Flight 77, then the official theory must be completely discarded.
At last, some 184 un-identified remains were buried at Arlington National Cemetery.
A five-sided granite marker bearing the 184 names will be placed over a shared grave at Arlington National Cemetery — the nation's most prestigious burial ground — holding the unidentified remains. [emphasis mine, LH]

--Arlington National Cemetery
Of the 184, sixty-four were said to have been passengers of Flight 77, the flight which is said to have crashed into the Pentagon.
A list of names on a piece of paper is not evidence, but an autopsy by a pathologist, is. I undertook by FOIA request, to obtain that autopsy list and you are invited to view it below. Guess what? Still no Arabs on the list. In my opinion the monsters who planned this crime made a mistake by not including Arabic names on the original list to make the ruse seem more believable.
When airline disasters occur, airlines will routinely provide a manifest list for anxious families. You may have noticed that even before Sep 11th, airlines are pretty meticulous about getting an accurate headcount before takeoff. It seems very unlikely to me, that five Arabs sneaked onto a flight with weapons. This is the list provided by American of the 56 passengers. On September 27th, the FBI published photos of the “hijackers” of Flight 77.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), does a miraculous job and identifies nearly all the bodies on November 16th 2001.
The AFIP suggest these numbers; 189 killed, 125 worked at the Pentagon and 64 were “passengers” on the plane. The AA list only had 56 and the list just obtained has 58. They did not explain how they were able to tell “victims” bodies from “hijacker” bodies. In fact, from the beginning NO explanation has been given for the extra five suggested in news reports except that the FBI showed us the pictures to make up the difference, and that makes it so.
--Thomas R. Olmsted, M.D, Autopsy: No Arabs on Flight 77
The numbers will never add up. Arlington National Cemetary says it interred 184. But AFIP says there were a total of 189 bodies --125 worked at the Pentagon and 64 were “passengers” on flight 77. Arlington claims that the unidentified remains of 184 victims share a grave at Arlington National Cemetery.
A five-sided granite marker bearing the 184 names will be placed over a shared grave at Arlington National Cemetery — the nation's most prestigious burial ground — holding the unidentified remains.
--Arlington National Cemetary
I interpret that to mean that this "shared grave" is the final resting place for unidentified victims from both the Pentagon and Flight 77.

Five are unaccounted for --presumably the "terrorist" hijackers. But that does not account for the discrepancy for several reasons. Both Arlington and AFIP claim that there were 64 Pentagon workers. AFIP provided a list of 56 passengers of Flight 77. That''s only 120! If you exclude 5 terrorists from the AFIP's total of 189, you are still left with 64 "people" completely unaccounted for. Who the hell are they?
No Arabs wound up on the morgue slab; however, three ADDITIONAL people not listed by American Airlines sneaked in. I have seen no explanation for these extras. I did American [Airlines] the opportunity to “revise” their original list, but they have not responded. The new names are: Robert Ploger, Zandra Ploger, and Sandra Teague. The AFIP claims that the only “passenger” body that they were not able to identify is the toddler, Dana Falkenberg, whose parents and young sister are on the list of those identified.
--Thomas R. Olmsted, M.D, Autopsy: No Arabs on Flight 77
These are just a tiny few of the myriad of facts that Bush loyalists cannot explain away or rationalize with the official conspiracy theory. The silver bullet is this: there were no arabs on the flight manifests when "officialdom" maintains that all the said hijackers were Arab.
Johnny Cochran won a famous murder trial with a single phrase which summed up his defense: "If it does not fit, you must acquit!" I rather think that a guilty party might be indicted just as simply: "No arabs on flight! You must indict!"These are fatal discrepancies in Bush's official conspiracy theory of 911. Any one of these glaring faults is enough to collapse the official 'theory', the official bald-faced lie.

But all are true. Therefore, nothing said by Bush about 911 can possibly be true. However, these are but a few of the fatal flaws and/or inconsistencies, impossibilities, outrages and absurdities to have issued from the Bush propaganda matrix. The tiny ditch and lack of wreckage in Pennsylvania, for example, support Donald Rumsfeld's 'misstatement' about the 'missile that shot down Flight 93'.

The obvious and admitted 'pulling' i.e, the 'controlled demolition' of Building 7, is enough in itself to dispense with critics who charge that there was not enough time to rig the buildings for demolition. The admitted controlled demolition of Bldg 7 is proof enough that wiring a building for demolition is not a problem if you own the building! Silverstein owned WTC and had access to every part of it. Method, motive, opportunity. Silverstein got $billions$ in insurance! $Billions$ would be considered motive in any criminal court at any time in any country. Except Bush's 'America'.

It is improbably coincidental that on the very day of the 911 attacks, Rudi Giuliani , who had set up an Office of Emergency Management and emergency command center on the 23rd floor of WTC7, abandoned that special bunker that had been designed precisely for such an event. Why? A real investigation of 911 would have asked that question. We, the people, are entitled to an answer. What are the odds that Rudi and crew would choose that very day to get the hell out of dodge? 3

Then there are Bush's 'odd' remarks about having seen the first plane crash the north tower on live TV. Only a pre-arranged, closed circuit set up delivering a signal to his improvised command central at a school house in Florida could make a truth of Bush's idiotic remark, a statement delivered in almost the same words on two occasions. Both can be found on the White House website. What can be done? I urge everyone who reads this to practice 'networking'. If you don't know a Federal Judge, perhaps you know someone who does. A Federal Judge can convene a Federal Grand Jury upon his own motion. A Federal Grand Jury can subpoena Bush himself as well as his cast of characters for which there is probable cause now to indict for numerous felonies and capital crimes, not the least of which is high treason, the waging of war against the people of the United States.Addendum:

Bush's official conspiracy theory was put forward in various statements by members of the Bush administration. Colin Powell, as I recall, may have been the first to name Al Qaeda specifically. The official theory is consistent only with regard to three basic components. Let's collapse them like a controlled demolition.

Al Qaeda, itself a 'terrorist conspiracy' said to have been led by Bin Laden, directed the attacks.

Several points undermine this theory, not the least of which is the relationship between Al Qaeda and the CIA, specifically, Richard Clark's revelation that Al Qaeda was created by the CIA, in their offices in Washington DC According to Clark, the al Qaeda's purpose was to help Saudi Arabia finance or, otherwise, bankroll Osama bin Laden, via the House of Saud, "in the Afghan war against the Soviet Union during the 1980's. Washington and Riyadh together contributed some $3.5 billion to the mujahideen." It is fair to ask: was al Qaeda acting under the direction and supervision of the CIA on 911? See: Al-Qaeda: A CIA protégé. Also: How the CIA created Osama bin Laden

Nineteen Arab Hijackers, working for al Qaeda, hijacked three airliners.

This is the weakest part of the official conspiracy theory. Those 'hijackers' who were said to have piloted 757s into WTC and the Pentagon were not even competent to fly Cessnas, let alone 757s. See: The Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training and Hijack 'suspects' alive and well; At Least 7 of the 9/11 Hijackers are Still Alive. At last, Mohammed Atta, whom official theorists call the boss of the operation, called his father on September 12, presumably to assure him that he was still alive and well!

The airliners were crashed into the Pentagon and the Twin Towers of the WTC causing the collapse of the 'Twin Towers'.

As stated in the body of the article: no airliner ever crashed into the Pentagon. We might learn what, in fact, struck the Pentagon, if Bush would simply order the release of hundreds, perhaps, thousands of photos that were made of whatever it was that struck the Pentagon. A single, blurry, indistinct animated GIF raises more questions than it answers. It is most certainly not a picture of a 757, leaving in its wake a 'white plume' not normally associated with airliners of any size at any speed or altitude. Unlike other famous crashes --Lockerbie, the Space Shuttle Columbia --whatever might have been recovered from whatever it was that struck the Pentagon was never investigated, reconstructed, or examined by experts who might have identified its origin. Airliners do not vaporize at any speed less than that of light itself. If an 80 ton airliner had struck the Pentagon, 80 tons of debris, however mangled, could have been located, gathered, and accounted for. That did not happen. Not much needs to be said about the WTC. There are, however, two glaring deficiencies in the official theory.
  1. Kerosene fires could not possibly have melted or weakened the steel sufficiently to collapse any building in the WTC, certainly not the perfectly controlled demolitions that are seen in hundreds, possibly thousands of videos. [See: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True]
  2. Rarely mentioned is the fact that Airliner bodies are made of aluminum, a metal softer than steel. Yet, on 911, airliners of this soft metal are seen penetrating hard steel. Like at the Pentagon, not a single wing broke off upon impact. The WTC tower 'cores' are made of steel girders in a dense mesh framework. Official theorists have imagined 757s penetrating the steel framework, 'slicing' steel girders with soft aluminum wings. It could not have happened and didn't!  
Debris is said to have caused the collapse of Building 7. It had not been hit by any aircraft of any sort. Therefore only "controlled demolition" explains its picture perfect collapse. A  Bush theorist desperately posited that one of the twin towers fell over onto Building 7. Utter bunkum! That anyone would put forward such nonsense is a measure of desperation.

In summary: nothing said by Bush about anything has been true --EVER! How can Americans believe that Bush, having lied about everything else, would or could tell the truth about 911. He didn't. 911 is a bigger hoax than that perpetrated to begin the mass murder of over million Iraqi civilians. Bush is a threat to the entire world and must be stopped. 

Additional resources.
Post a Comment