Sunday, November 02, 2008

How the GOP Enriched the Rich and Made Everyone Else Poor!

If you have experienced a 'decline' in your net worth, you have gotten poorer. Congratulations! You have now joined the MILLIONS whose net worth numbers have declined consistently over a period of 28 years of GOP domination, incompetence and vainglorious imperial designs from which ONLY the Military/Industrial complex has benefited! Enough of this crap is enough. Just tell the GOP to bugger off!

The 'L-curve' helps one imagine the degree to which wealth in the United States is inequitably distributed by policy and by design. The US population is represented 'stretched across a football field in order of income, from poorest, on the left, to richest. Imagine a stack of $100 bills 'representing each person's income.' For example: a stack one inch high represents a stack of one hundred dollars bills, i.e, $25,000. The red line on the graph represents the height of that stack compared to an American football field.

"The red line in the first picture is the beginning of the U. S. income distribution. On the scale of the football field the line slopes gradually from zero on the left to less than 2-inches high at the 50-yard line ($39,000), to about 4-inches high at the 95-yard line ($132,000). On this scale the entire graph is less than one pixel high, up to this point. It is not until you are well past the 99-yard line that you hit the $1 million mark: a stack of $100 bills 40-inches high. There were over 144,000 people who turned in IRS returns in 1997 with adjusted gross incomes of $1 million or more." [See: Houston Independent Media Center, Wealth Distribution in the US http://houston.indymedia.org/news/2003/07/14100.php ]

Although the US economy produces tremendous wealth, it is always accompanied in GOP regimes by tremendous poverty. The US, for example, was most egalitarian in the years immediately following WWII. During GOP regimes, income inequality increased and is, in fact, measured with the GINI index. Higher Ginis indicate greater levels of income inequality. These indices have been significantly greater in every GOP regime since World War II.

Certainly --there is enough wealth to go around. Instead, wealth flows upward ---not down, as the propagandists of 'supply side' i.e. 'trickle down theory' would have you believe. The problem is systemic --the result of identifiable, right wing policies.

The primary culprits are GOP tax cuts by Mssrs Ronald Reagan and Bush; the effect of those cuts have been the deliberate transfer of wealth first to the upper quintile and, most recently, to an increasingly tiny elite of about one percent of the total population [See: Dr. Daniel Weinberger, US Census Bureau Briefings; Also see: The Quarterly Journal of Economics: Income Inequality in the United States at the following URL: http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/pikettyqje.pdf]. It's a PDF and cites academic and official, original sources of data.


As wealth is transferred to the very top with tax cuts for only the very, very wealthy and practitioners of 'corporate socialism', the masses are left to fight over the crumbs. There is no poverty in America that could not be addressed by simply addressing GOP tax policies --give aways -- which deliberately make the rich richer, the working class significantly poorer.

If you are in the middle class now, don't kid yourself. Unless you stand to inherit a fortune of several billions from a rich and long lost Uncle, the chances are almost exponentially high against you. Chances are --you will NOT progress upward in this society. Moreover, this aspect of American society is the work of one party primarily: the GOP! The GOP is the party of a rich elites who have learned how to 'sell' a fairy tale: supply side economics, or, derisively --"trickle down theory". To sum it all up: wealth has never, does not, will not 'trickle down'.
...what does the Wealthy One Percent want? Answer: more wealth. Where will they get it? As with a tube of toothpaste, they're squeezing it from the bottom. Median paychecks have gone down by 5.9% during the current regime, but Americans in the bottom fifth have seen their incomes sliced by 20%.

At the other end, CEO pay at the Fortune 500 has bloated by 51% during the first four years of the Bush regime to an average of $8.1 million per annum.

So who's winning? It's a crude indicator, but let's take a peek at the Class War body count.

When Reagan took power in 1980, the One Percent possessed 33% of America's wealth as measured by capital income. By 2006, the One Percent has swallowed over half of all America's assets, from sea to shining sea. One hundred fifty million Americans altogether own less than 3% of all private assets.

Yes, American middle-class house values are up, but we're blowing that gain to stay alive. Edward Wolff, the New York University expert on income, explained to me that, "The middle class is mortgaging itself to death." As a result of mortgaging our new equity, 60% of all households have seen a decline in net worth.

--Today's Pig is Tomorrow's Bacon
Clearly --the GOP leadership has learned nothing from the Bush debacle. The GOP has learned nothing from the back to back debacles of Reagan and Bush Sr. The GOP is like the idiot doctor who tells his patient: just keep on doing whatever makes you sick!
Nine straight months of job losses, a collapse in consumer spending, growing home foreclosures, and few good signs for the future, all point, economists now say, to the fact that recession has overtaken the economy.

Today, things appeared to get worse. The government released its quarterly GDP estimates showing the economy shrank by 0.3 percent. The collapse was fueled by the sharpest drop in consumer spending in 28 years, economist Josh Bivens of the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) told reporters on a teleconference after the report was released.

Bivens blamed the the contraction of consumer spending that led to the recession primarily on the collapse of the housing market.

In addition, government data revealed that state and local governments are struggling to make ends meet and dragging down economic growth, and labor income has also fallen over the past three consecutive quarters, Bivens said.

Consumer spending is linked to labor income, Bivens noted. People can only spend in the economy when they have good paychecks or credit. Since both income is falling and debt has many working families unable to continue to spend at the same rates, consumer spending has suffered.

--Recession is On, McCain Offers More Bush Policies
It gets worse. As the utterly failed Bush debacle winds down, the GOP loots the nation, grabbing what has not been nailed down, grabbing whatever has not been already stolen and funneling to banks billions of dollars under the rubric of a bailout that has not bailed out anyone but those who are rich already!

The 'bailout' --we were to suppose --would just 'trickle down'. But like all those other GOP 'trickle down' frauds, this one got hijacked by the privileged elites. I believe the money has been largely pissed away and stolen.

How much of that 700 Billion do you suppose has wound up in Switzerland or Lichenstein?

How much has been squirreled away for Bush's 'get away' to Paraguay?

In the meantime, how much of that money has already been given away to cronies as DIVIDENDS?

There is no rational defense of 'elitism'. GOP elitism is why we are where we are and where we are is NOT where we ought to be!
Half of the bank bailout is being paid out as dividends ! These bastards are shameless!
U.S. banks getting more than $163 billion from the Treasury Department for new lending are on pace to pay more than half of that sum to their shareholders, with government permission, over the next three years.
And in case you missed it two weeks ago: one of every ten dollars of the "bailout" is being used to pay bonuses! That's right - the bastards are getting $70 billion in bonuses for destroying the financial system and wrecking the economy.

Joe Nocera reported in The New York Times on an Oct. 17, internal conference call for senior employees of JPMorgan Chase, in which a Morgan Chase employee had the bad grace to ask,

“Chase recently received $25 billion in federal funding. What effect will that have on the business side and will it change our strategic lending policy?”
That would be a key question, wouldn’t it? Afterall, the whole purpose of the $700 billion bank rescue was to unfreeze the credit markets and get banks lending again.

--Pissing away $700 billion
Get a rope!

Enough of this crap is enough.

Tell the GOP to bugger off!

Tell the GOP that their 'contributions' to the demise of America are no longer welcome.

Tell the GOP that they have worn out their welcome!

Tell the GOP that putting another 'label' on the same old bullshit won't work anymore.

Tell the GOP to get 'outta' town, get lost, shut the fuck up, and don't let the door hit you in your sorry ass on your way out!

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Excellent post! The GOP deserves to be in minority status for the next 50 years for their reckless and irresponsible behavior since Reagan was in office!

Unknown said...

Anonymous said...

Excellent post! The GOP deserves to be in minority status for the next 50 years for their reckless and irresponsible behavior since Reagan was in office!

Thanks, anony! It would not upset me terribly if the GOP just went away. Who needs these stupid, evil fuckers anyway?

Freedom of speech is fine and good! But overt GOP criminality is NOT protected free speech.

The THEFT OF ELECTIONS is not protected free speech.

HIGH TREASON is not protected free speech.

Complicity to commit high treason and conspiracy to commit war crimes, other capital crimes and high treason are NOT protected free speech.

The GOP is not a political party. It's a crime syndicate and a kooky cult.

I welcome the loyal opposition.

But 'loyal' does not describe a party that has conspired with paid criminals to TRASH the Constitution and abrogate --unlawfully --the Constitutional protections of all Americans.

FUCK THE GOP!

A POX ON THEIR HOUSE!

THEIR ILK HAS DESTROYED AMERICA!

Anonymous said...

Of course these bastards are shameless. They truly believe in social darwinism. They're superior because we're inferior. They think we are born to serve them. Receiving 700 billion of our dollars doesn't change anything, of course they're going to pay out dividends and bonuses. To them it's the natural order of the universe.

http://pathwhisperer.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/welcome-to-our-sociopaths-gone-wild-economy/

Anonymous said...

Len, doesn't the L-curve leave out the wealth held by corporations or the fact all (or nearly all) our cash is held in banks which have control and use of it?

Who would you rather have control of the nation's cash, to put it to work: banks, corporations or individuals (who carry it in their pockets)?

Unknown said...

pathwhisperer said...

Of course these bastards are shameless. They truly believe in social darwinism.

Social Darwinism was best summed up by Dicken's 'Scrooge' who said: "Are there no workhouses? Are there no prisons...then let them die and decrease the surplus population."

'Social Darwinism', of course, is NOT Darwinism. Social Darwinism is bunkum. Darwin's theory of the evolution of species, however, is still on the whole a very accurate description of the 'evolution' of species primarily because it is 1) NOT teleological 2) it does not mistake 'end results' for 'causes' as do creationists as well as those who believe in 'acquired characteristics'.

MarkH sez...

Len, doesn't the L-curve leave out the wealth held by corporations or the fact all (or nearly all) our cash is held in banks which have control and use of it?

The L-curve deals with the net worth of 'individuals' --not corporations.

However, the balance sheet of an individual includes among his/her assets whatever STOCKS he owns. I leave it to the accountants to assign a value to those assets. Unfortunately, that is as much an 'art' and it is the 'science' of accounting. Naturally, if Bill Gates retains significant shares in Microsoft, or R. Murdoch significant holdings in his LEGALIZED LIBEL network, those assets would show up on the asset side of his balance sheet.

I suspect that if one prepared a chart of wealth owned by 'individual proprietorships' vs that held by 'corporations', the curve will proabably look very much like the L-curve with the big corporations like Microsoft owning almost everything.

Who would you rather have control of the nation's cash, to put it to work: banks, corporations or individuals (who carry it in their pockets)?

I would rather that those who actually CREATE WEATH control a significant portion of their own wealth. At present --the VAST majority of that money trickles up! NOT down!

LanceThruster said...

Len said,

"...or R. Murdoch significant holdings in his LEGALIZED LIBEL network..."

This phrase is pure gold. It's a god damned libel machine; allowing his propaganda to reverberate through the echo chamber at whatever frequency he desires.

I also agree with you about the "loyal opposition." Different worldviews should compete in the arena of ideas. But thanks to our genetic heritage, people are far more often swayed, not by the actual strength of the argument, but by the primitive buttons it can push (fear, greed, hate, desire) which tend to override the higher brain's function of processing complex issues whether those primal responses are valid or not.

Rethuglican spinmeisters have played us for saps for the longest time, with wedge issues, or most successfully, employing misdirection with the "180 Rule" constantly (i.e. blaming the other side for the very crimes they commit - hate speech, vote fraud, destruction of the Constitution and the values and protections is codifies).

The current spin is for the true believers to lay low and wage a guerilla war against the "anti-American" forces (i.e. in their minds, anyone not a "true believer").

Thank goodness that at least in this election cycle it seems, that the GOP brand is viewed as "50 pounds of suck in a 5 pound bag."

Unknown said...

LanceThuster sez...

I also agree with you about the "loyal opposition." Different worldviews should compete in the arena of ideas. But thanks to our genetic heritage, people are far more often swayed, not by the actual strength of the argument, but by the primitive buttons it can push (fear, greed, hate, desire) which tend to override the higher brain's function of processing complex issues whether those primal responses are valid or not.

I am inclined to posit that the source of EVERY immorality is found in the telling of deliberate lies. LIes are told to deceive, defraud, and destroy. Bush's lies about WMD fall into every category. Jacob Bronowski --in his "Science and Human Values" --wrote of the moral imperative implied in the discipline of 'Logical Positivism': 'Behave in such a manner than what is true may be verified to be so!' The GOP is premised upon such deliberate falsehoods.

Rethuglican spinmeisters have played us for saps for the longest time, with wedge issues, or most successfully, employing misdirection with the "180 Rule" constantly (i.e. blaming the other side for the very crimes they commit - hate speech, vote fraud, destruction of the Constitution and the values and protections is codifies).

As nothing seems to have changed in the mainstream media, still dependent upon the big corporations for their livings, I am inclined to believe that the internet has played a major role. It's obvious that the GOP, a top-down, medieval authoritarian structure, is ill-prepred to deal with free speech as it is practiced on 'the inner tubes' and 'the nets'. I belive that there are, as we write and post here, moves afoot to create a 'super internet', in other words, a way for big, Republican-leaning corporations, to create another top down bureaucray that can be CONTROLLED from the top as revenues TRICKLE UP TO THE TOP from those on bottom. The GOP likes that kind of chart. It's in their crooked genes.

Thank goodness that at least in this election cycle it seems, that the GOP brand is viewed as "50 pounds of suck in a 5 pound bag."

GREAT LINE!

James Whistler had been especially witty at a London dinner party and Oscar Wilde told Whistler: "I wish I had said that!" Whistler shot back wryly: "You will, Oscar! You will!"

Indeed --I may borrow that line (with your permission, of course :) )

LanceThruster said...

Thank goodness that at least in this election cycle it seems, that the GOP brand is viewed as "50 pounds of suck in a 5 pound bag."

GREAT LINE!

James Whistler had been especially witty at a London dinner party and Oscar Wilde told Whistler: "I wish I had said that!" Whistler shot back wryly: "You will, Oscar! You will!"

Indeed --I may borrow that line (with your permission, of course :) )


---

Len,

Why not? I borrowed it from someone else (So your Whistler quote is spot on! ;-). If I knew where I'd give them the credit. I had heard in some variation before but heard again just recently as a line of TV dialog (HBO's Trueblood?). I'll admit I increased the suckiness quotient a bit. I think the line was, "You look like 10lbs of suck in a 5lb bag" but it seemed too tame when describing GOP scum.

It's always a pleasure to read your stuff Len, and I don't know anyone (blogger or otherwise) more willing to interact, answer, and defend or even modify positions when discussing with other people who share your concerns.

I'll leave you with one of my favorite quotes that is both encouraging and a warning. It was by the author himself on a cable program called "Great Books."

Joseph Heller said, "Catch-22 means that people have the right to do to you anything that you cannot prevent them from doing to you."

I used to chafe at his inclusion of the word "right" but as we've learned from recent history, is it really a right if we can't defend it?

Be well!