by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy
The FBI has admitted, officially, that it cannot find any 'evidence' or documentation to support popular myths that some four airliners were hijacked by terrorists and used as weapons on 911. Their investigation, says the FBI, was based upon the never questioned assumption that the said flights had been hijacked. The Bush 'presidency' is not an administration; it is a criminal conspiracy! This comes on the heels of my recent article in which I cited flight data released by the NTSB indicating that Flight 77 never dropped below 273 feet. That's a job the FBI should have done. The latest disclosure from the FBI, however, pull the rug from beneath a panoply of black-hearted lies by Bush and most of his administration. The official conspiracy theory of 911 is kaput!
There is not a shred of evidence in support of anything said by Bush about 911 at any time. Bush's official conspiracy theory is now proven to have been a tissue of lies from its inception! It is now proven to have been based, at least in part, upon mere assumptions by the FBI. It may be more accurate to conclude that Bush, his administration and enablers, would not have gotten away with it had the FBI done its job.Let's put this another way: there is absolutely nothing to support Bush/Rummie/Powell/Rice assertions with regard to any aspect of 911. In short: Bush has absolutely nothing with which he may prove any statement ever made by him or his administration with regard to the crime of mass murder called '911' for short! The following statement from David M. Hardy, Section Chief, Records, FBI, was posted on 911Bloggers.com:
The following is a statement by the Section Chief of the Record/lnformation Dissemination Section ("RlDS") of the FBI regarding the unsuccessful search for records or facsimiles of records, pertaining the 4 aircraft identified by the FBI and NTSB as being used during terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 or wreckage generated by them, including 2 flight data recorders. This statement is a defense exhibit for use in an upcoming oral arguments hearing pertaining to a federal court case for records for the 4 aircraft used during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.SEARCH FOR RECORDS RESPONSlVETO PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTPlaintiff's original FOIA request sought "documentation pertaining to any formally and positively identified debris" from the aircraft used in the September 11th attacks. In response to this request, RIDS personnel at FBIHQ understood that any potentially responsive records would have been compiled for law enforcement purposes and would be located in a pending file because of an ongoing law enforcement investigation.There is no official documentation, evidence connecting any of the said flights to the events of 911. In other words, there is no proof whatsoever that any flight at any time did what the Bush administration has told the American people that it did. There is no evidence, for example, that Flight 77 struck the Pentagon. Indeed, this blog reported just days ago official NTSB flight data represented by NTSB to be from Flight 77. This information is directly contrary to the 'official conspiracy theory'. According to this NTSB data, Flight 77 could not have crashed into the Pentagon; after take off, it never dropped below 273 feet. At this point, it may be well to sum up some previous posts.RIDS personnel therefore determined that any records would be withheld in their entirety pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A). The FBI then received a copy of plaintiff's complaint for injunctive relief, later amended, wherein plaintiff requested the FBI to "produce agency records, concerning documentation revealing the process by which wreckage recovered by defendant, from the aircraft used during the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, was positively identified by defendant (with the aid of the National Transportation Safety Board) as belonging to the said aircraft, presumably through the use of unique serial number identifying information contained by the said aircraft wreckage, that was collected by defendant and which defendant has improperly withheld from plaintiff." In response to this request, RlDS conducted a search for potentially responsive records at FBIHQ on February 11, 2008. A search of the CRS was conducted using the following subjects: "Airline Debris," "Debris Identification," "Commercial Aircraft," "Aircraft Identification," "Aircraft Debris," "Aircraft Wreckage," "Aircraft," "Recovered Debris," "National Transportation and Safety Bureau," "National Transportation Safety Board," "NTSB," "American Airlines," "American Airlines Flight," "American Airlines Flight Eleven," "American Airlines Flight Number 11," "American Airlines Flight 77," "N334AA," "N612UA," "N644AA," "N591UA," "Flight 175," "Flight 11," "Flight 77," "Flight 93," "Identifying Aircraft Parts," "Factual Report Aviation," "Federal Aviation Administration," "Pentbomb," "Ground Zero," "Freshkills Landfill," and "Fresh Kills Landfill."Despite this extensive and detailed search effort, RlDS has been unable to locate any FBI records responsive to plaintiffs request.RIDS' search efforts included a verification by the case agent for the investigation. The case agent stated that since the identities of the four hijacked aircraft have never been in question by the FBI, NTSB or FAA (evidence collected after September 11, 2001 has corroborated the fact that American Airlines Flight 11, United Airlines Flight 175, American Airlines Flight 77 and United Flight 93 were the aircraft hijacked), no records would have been generated responsive to plaintiffs request for documents. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and that Exhibits A-J attached hereto are true and correct copies.Executed this 8th day of August, 2008David M. HARDY
Section Chief
Records/Information Dissemination Section
Records Management Division
Federal Bureau of investigation, Washington, DC--911Bloggers.com
High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's Theory Falls ApartWho lies about crimes? those who wish to cover them up! What is the only motive for covering up a crime? to protect the guilty!What is the primary motive for protecting a guilty person? if the one lying is the guilty party or is complicit with other guilty parties! Who lied about 911? the entire Bush administration seems premised upon a gestalt of demonstrable lies about a highly improbable, most certainly fictitious conspiracy of incompetent Arab pilots enthrall to one Bin Laden, a CIA asset, said to have been the leader of 'Al Qaeda', a name given this 'conspiracy' by the CIA during the Soviet/Afghan war. It means "The Base".911 Commission co-chairs claim that they were misled, perhaps deliberately, by the Bush administration and Pentagon brass. Because 911 was an act of mass murder overtly covered up by the Bush administration, the many lies by Bush amount to more than mere obstructions of justice or cover ups. They amount to high treason --a mechanism by which this administration seized power unconstitutionally. Holes in Bush's theories are holes in Bush's theories.
...
The NIST Tries to 'Repeal' the Laws of Entropy and the First & Second Laws of ThermodynamicsThe NIST's latest theory ignores satellite thermal photos of ground zero indicating abnormally high temperatures for months after 911. The NIST theory du jour ignores this data and fails to explain it!
Under-estimating the intelligence of the American people, the NIST persists in papering over the endless holes in Bush's official conspiracy theories of 911. Openly declaring that its new 'report' will finish off critics of Bush's official conspiracy theory of 911, NIST has presumed to repeal laws of physics --the laws of entropy as well as the First & the Second Laws of Thermodynamics. Are we to expect Bush will now try repeal the equations of Galileo and Newton which describe precisely the free fall of sabotaged towers in New York? Perhaps Bush and his NEOCON co-conspirators will re-design the universe itself!...
NTSB Flight Data: Official 'Explanation' of Flight 93 is a Criminal Fraud! According to official NTSB Flight Data, Flight 93 could not possibly have crashed in the field in PA. The flight data flatly contradicts Bush's official conspiracy theory of 911. Guess which one is lying!
I recently posted NTSB data indicating that Flight 77 never dropped below 273 feet! Flight 77, therefore, could not have crashed into the Pentagon. The Pentagon is only 71 feet tall.
Secondly, according to the official flight data released by the NTSB, Flight 77 could not have damaged the light poles. 77 was much too high; the poles are only 40 feet high and on the wrong trajectory. Damien, a regular contributor to this blog, has put together an exhaustive survey of equally disturbing holes in the official theories concerning Flight 93 which we have been expected to believe crashed in PA. Following is Damien's report --a damning critique and proof that the Bush cabal cover stories about Flight 93 are simply impossible and violate the recently discussed "Occam's Razor' by raising infinitely more questions than Bush's theories have been able to explain.Simply --any theory that raises more questions than it explains may be discarded. In this case, there are so many demonstrably deliberate lies, that one is justified in concluding that the Bush administration and the US military have deliberately lied to the American people about 911. The term for that is HIGH TREASON!...
NTSB Flight Data: Flight 77 Could Not Have Crashed into the PentagonNTSB data indicates Flight 77 never dropped below 273 feet! Therefore, Flight 77 could not have crashed into the Pentagon. The Pentagon is only 71 feet tall. Secondly, according to the black box data, Flight 77 could not have damaged the light poles. 77 was much too high (the poles are only 40 feet) and on the wrong trajectory. Dare we hope that this is the wooden stake driven into the heart of vile, evil, official lies about 911?
Data released by the NTSB in response to an FOIA request by Pilots for 911 Truth are nothing less than the raw "black box' file, the official 'flight data' recorded from Flight 77. It's a digital record of everything that happened on that flight from take off. Additionally, altitude and position are confirmed by the beacon at nearby Reagan National Airport.
The most prominent liar in the Bush administration is Bush himself, an habitual, psychopathic liar/murderer who is incapable of telling the truth even by accident! Others include Donald Rumsfeld who told the truth inadvertently when he referred to '...the missile that struck this building' [the Pentagon!]. . Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them.On another occasion, he referred to a 'missile' shooting down Flight 93. There is no indication that Rumsfeld intended to tell the truth. Chalk it up to senility! Other Bush admin liars include Colin Powell who deceived the entire world on Bush's behalf, basing his lies to the UN upon ten year old satellite photos and plagiarized student papers! Ohter liars include, of course, Condoleeza Rice who said that no one could have foreseen that 'terrorists' would use airplanes to strike buildings. In fact, just such a scenario was the basis for G8 Summit security. Rice also warned San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown not to be flying on September 11th. Her warning preceded the attacks by about 3 days, as I recall. She knew and lied! Other liars inside an administration premised upon lies should not be difficult. Members of a federal grand jury reading this: you have your work cut out for you. Get to work. You have the authority to subpoena anyone you please about anything. Work your way up to Bush. You will be returning federal indictments till the cows come home! Personal message to Bush: give it up, jack! Resign! Make yourself available for arrest by federal marshalls. Get yourself a lawyer! We, the sovereign people of the United States, are going to try you and your complicit minions for the crimes of high treason, mass murder and the war of naked aggression against Iraq, itself a violation of US Codes, Title 18, Section 2441:
--Donald Rumsfeld, US Dept of Defense, Official Transcript
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 118 > § 2441§ 2441. War crimes(a) Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.Every civilian death in Iraq is a capital crime for which George W. Bush is personally responsible and culpable. Last time I checked the civilian death count as a result of the illegal US presence in Iraq is well over a million. The word for that is 'mass murder'. The so-called 'President' of the US is a mass murderer. I don't think that we, the people, should have to live with or put up with that intolerable situation. I don't think we should be supporting wars of aggression or mass murder with out tax monies. I don't think that the governance of the United States can be entrusted to a criminal cabal of defense contractors, brass, and blithering idiots like Michael Hayden. I don't think our tax monies are well-spent if they have enabled a psychopathic mass murderer like George W. Bush to hijack the awesome military power of the US.The following comments were 'moderated' because, frankly, I sick to death of the stupidity these comments represent. But --because I am really a very nice guy and will often tolerate fools and idiots, here are the comments and my response:
If flight "77 never dropped below 273 ft." then where did it go, what happened to it?
That's a BIG HOLE in the official theory and, if Bush's official theory had been true, it would have been addressed. It wasn't! The point is: the official conspiracy theory is a lie. TRUE 'theories' explain observed events. The Bush theory DOES NOT explain observed events because it was a bald faced lie from the outset.
How do we have evidence concerning its altitude if we don't have the (remains of) the plane?
That has been explained numerous times in my article. The flight recorder data was released by the NTSB to the the pilot organization cite in response to an FOIA request. That fact that the flight data recorder was recovered is simply another glaring hole in the official theory will holds that Flight 77 was utterly vaporized. Obviously, if the government is releasing the details of the flight, details recorded as it was in flight, then the airliner in question was obviously NOT vaporized --now was it? It was also --obviously --NOT at the Pentagon. Also see: Shocking Evidence Emerges Implicating Bush Jr In Satanic Ritual Sacrifices!
6 comments:
Here's an excellent site, that just came online recently, called "Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth."
We are not implying the improbable is impossible. As professional firefighters, we have seen many things from fire, accident and crime scenes that don’t “make sense”. What we are suggesting is that there is more than sufficient evidence to doubt the “official” government story. There was no reason to destroy the very steel from all three towers that would have aided in the investigation. There is no reason to withold vast amounts of evidence that would very clearly support or disprove their version (ie: hard evidence proving the make/model/specific registration numbers from the aircraft, or the complete collection of the Pentagon vidoes, specifically any images of a commercial jet flying into the Pentagon). There is a large body of physical, photographic, audio, witness testimony and video evidence that directly contradicts the “official” story. We challenge you to really look at what the goverment has presented versus what many independent researchers have produced.
This is directly from the 2001 Edition of the National Fire Protection Association NFPA 921 Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations.
19.2.4 - “Exotic Accelerants. Mixtures of fuels and Class 3 or Class 4 oxidizers may produce an exceedingly hot fire and may be used to start or accelerate a fire. Thermite mixtures also produce exceedingly hot fires. Such accelerants generally leave residues that may be visually or chemically identifiable.
Exotic accelerants have been hypothesized as having been used to start or accelerate some rapidly growing fires and were referred to in these particular instances as high temperature accelerants (HTA). Indicators of exotic accelerants include an exceedingly rapid rate of fire growth,
brilliant flares (particularly at the start of the fire), and melted steel or concrete. A study of 25 fires suspected of being associated with HTAs during the 1981-1991 period revealed that there was no conclusive scientific proof of the use of such HTA.
In any fire where the rate of fire growth is considered exceedingly rapid, other reasons for this should be considered in addition to the use of an accelerant, exotic or otherwise. These reasons include ventilation, fire suppression tactics, and the type and configuration of the fuels.”
NIST denies the existence of molten metal even though we have video and photographic evidence suggesting otherwise. We also have witness testimony from FDNY firemen themselves. Jet fuel and content fires do not produce the temperatures necessary to produce molten steel - that is why NIST has to deny the very presence of molten metal. This is not small stuff. This is a “smoking gun.” NFPA very clearly states melted steel or concrete is a sign of exotic accelerants. Therefore, the debris should have been thoroughly analyzed for exotic accelerants, specifically Thermite.
P.S. This site has some excellent pictures of the WTC Towers, especially the one showing a river of molten metal pouring out of one of the towers. And pics of large chunks of molten steel and concrete.
http://firefightersfor911truth.org/
NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 921, which is the National Standard for Fire and Explosion Investigations, very clearly indicates in numerous sections that the possibility of explosives should have been thoroughly investigated. Specifically in NFPA 921 18.3.2 “High Order Damage”- “High-order damage is characterized by shattering of the structure, producing small, pulverized debris. Walls, roofs, and structural members are splintered or shattered, with the building completely demolished. Debris is thrown great distances, possibly hundreds of feet. High-order damage is the result of rapid rates of pressure rise.” World Trade Center’s 1, 2, and 7 all clearly met this definition; therefore they should have been thoroughly investigated and analyzed for explosives. Specifically, the use of “exotic accelerants” should have been investigated. In NFPA 921 19.2.4 - “Exotic Accelerants,” three indicators were clearly met that should have led to a thorough investigation in to the possible use of “exotic accelerants,” specifically as stated in the guideline, “Thermite mixtures.”
http://firefightersfor911truth.org/?page_id=23
The following comments were 'moderated' because, frankly, I sick to death of the stupidity these comments represent. But --because I am really a very nice guy and will often tolerate fools and idiots, here are the comments and my response:
If flight "77 never dropped below 273 ft." then where did it go, what happened to it?
That's a BIG HOLE in the official theory and, if Bush's official theory had been true, it would have been addressed. It wasn't! The point is: the official conspiracy theory is a lie. TRUE 'theories' explain observed events. The Bush theory DOES NOT explain observed events because it was a bald faced lie from the outset.
How do we have evidence concerning its altitude if we don't have the (remains of) the plane?
That has been explained numerous times in my article. The flight recorder data was released by the NTSB to the the pilot organization cite in response to an FOIA request. That fact that the flight data recorder was recovered is simply another glaring hole in the official theory will holds that Flight 77 was utterly vaporized. Obviously, if the government is releasing the details of the flight, details recorded as it was in flight, then the airliner in question was obviously NOT vaporized --now was it? It was also --obviously --NOT at the Pentagon.
Len;
I don’t think this regime ever expected to have to defend it’s fairy tale concerning the events on 9/11. Most people saw the two planes fly into the side of the towers on TV. TV made sure most saw Bush at the WTO site, standing on a pile of rubble with a bull horn. The public was expected to look at Bush as some kind of savior that could be trusted. What he, and his regime said was deemed the truth.
Witness the way Bush et al fought the creation of the 9/11 Commission and then only conceded after laying ground rules that had the White House orchestrating the Commission’s investigation.
One side note, not only the Mayor of San Francisco, the Crisco Kid quit using commercial air lines before 9/11 also.
Today, for some reason this early in the morning, I can’t think of the Crisco Kid’s real name off the top of my head. I do know that he was an ardent supporter of the MEK while the Senator from Missouri. He is the only man I know of that lost a Governor’s race to a dead man and he was Bush’s first Attorney General. In short, he was the south end of a north bound horse.
If all this is true, and I believe it is, then wouldn't that make the "war" in Afghanistan an illegal action as well? There are additionally tens of thousands more innocent civilians killed or wounded or everything they had is destoyed, not to mention the utter disregard for dead and wounded American soldiers who are supposed to be able to believe their Commander-in-Chief. Torture and beheading are too good for these criminals who stole our government in 2000. Please let them be exposed and convicted in my lifetime. Keep up the good work.
Greg Bacon said...
NIST denies the existence of molten metal even though we have video and photographic evidence suggesting otherwise. We also have witness testimony from FDNY firemen themselves.
The NIST is trapped by its own bias going in.
If 'molten steel' exists, then the NIST is proven to be full o'shit! Certainly, the NIST, then, has an interest in perpetuating a lie.
Problem is, as you point out neither the kerosene fires NOR the 'content fires' would have EVER brought those towers down. Something else generated the necessary heat.
The NIST report is what you get when you entrust liars with the task of investigation.
Thanks Len, and thanks Greg B., too. The single biggest problem in exposing the lies- no wait, you've done that... it's getting a majority of the poulace to even CONSIDER that 9/11 was an inside job. I just hope we can find out the truth about who all was behind this, in my lifetime. Oh, if only someone would come forward who KNOWS the truth... of course they would probably have an "accident" or "commit suicide", like those poor bastards from the Armed-Nuke-Bomber "incident". Great post, way to keep this story going, you rock man.
Post a Comment