Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Why were 'first responders' decontaminated at the Pentagon?

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

Decontamination is done when one is exposed to radiation! Why, then, were 911 'first responders' to the Pentagon de-contaminated? That they were is compelling evidence that DU [Depleted Uranium] ammunition and armour-piercing technology were present; it is compelling evidence that Bush's 'official conspiracy theory' of 911 is utter bullshit! If DU had been used at the Pentagon, then the fire and damage was most certainly not caused by a hijacked 757.

There is not a shred of hard evidence to support any part of Bush's 'official theory' which fails to explain anything about the Pentagon crash. A more rational explanation is required consistent with observed and verifiable facts on the ground and in the photos. Bush's official theory merely ignores the difficult parts; its authors hoped that you would not notice.

Facts unexplained by the 'official' theory include:
  • a 16 x 20 penetration hole much too small accommodate a 757
  • a punch out hole in the inner ring (too small; a soft, aluminum bodied 757 would not have made it that far anyway)
  • the utter lack of even so much as a skid mark on a pristine, putting green lawn
  • no wings were ever recovered from the lawn, the building, or the inner ring. Where are they?
  • Donald Rumsfeld referred to a 'missile that struck this building'; a 757 is NOT a missile but a U.S. Global Hawk most certainly is --and it carries a payload.
  • the total debris gathered is but a small fraction of the total debris that would have been left by an airliner. [See: conservation of matter and energy] According to the 'conservation of energy and matter, neither energy nor matter is ever destroyed; it merely changes form. Whatever struck the Pentagon would leave behind its own weight in debris.
That the Bush 'official conspiracy theory' violates the long established principle of the 'conservation of matter and energy' is the smoking gun. The only other explanation is that 911 was an inside job and no airliner ever struck the Pentagon.

It is the job of 'theories' in law, science or forensics to explain. A 'theory' raising more questions than it explains is a bad theory --even if it is official. Bush's official conspiracy theory of 911 is worse than 'bad theory' --it's a treasonous lie.

Official FEMA photographs from the Pentagon depict what is obviously an engine rotor with a diameter estimated at about three feet, obviously from an aircraft which is credibly estimated (from the photos) to be about 1/3 the size of each of two much larger 757 rotors. Larger rotors, traceable to a 757 were NEVER found at the Pentagon. Had a 757 crashed, the rotors of titanium-steel alloy to withstand interior engine heat, would have survived to be found. That they were not proves that they were never there! Ergo: NO 757 ever crashed the Pentagon --hijacked or no!

The photographs of the 'rotor' were published in the American Free Press and, so far, no one has dared claim that it is the rotor of a 757 engine --an aircraft that we are told hit the Pentagon. The engine rotor from a 757 is about three times the size at about 9 feet in diameter. If an airliner had crashed the Pentagon, two such rotors --each some 9 feet in diameter would have been found. They were not found because they were never there.

The three-rotor turbine was found near insulation and part of a 'housing', evidence that it was the wreckage of a much smaller aircraft than a 757 --a U.S. Global Hawk, perhaps. In any case, its presence does not support Bushco's 'official conspiracy theory'; moreover, the 'official conspiracy theory' cannot explain the presence of small aircraft wreckage. The 'official conspiracy theory' utterly falls apart.

The Pentagon was and remains among the most 'surveilled' buildings in the world. Hundreds, perhaps, thousands of frames were taken of whatever it was that crashed the Pentagon. The point is clear: the debate about what actually struck the Pentagon could have been put to rest before it began had the government --the Bush administration --released all the photos that were taken that day. If Bush is annoyed because people demand the truth, he has only himself to blame. Bush could have given himself up, confessed, submitted to trial, been convicted and hanged! It would haved saved the nation a nightmare.

Now --if Bush is guilty, his refusal to release the photos is completely understandable! Guilty people are highly motivated to hide or destroy evidenceA photo of a Global Hawk, for example, is compelling evidence, perhaps a 'smoking gun', that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. If Bush were entirely innocent of all wrong doing in connection with 911, it would have been in his interest to release every photograph and to have ordered a complete and thorough investigation of 911. But --instead --Bush chose to cover it up and accuse those questioning him of high treason! Fact is --only if Bush is guilty is it in his interest to 'cover it up'. Bush covered up 911 and ordered physical evidence destroyed --NOT the behavior of an innocent man! 911 continues to be covered up to this day! Draw your own conclusions.

The nail in the coffin is the fact that 911 responders were de-contaminated at the Pentagon. The official theory doesn't even try to explain that fact! It was assumed that we would never find out about it. That 911 responders were de-contaminated does two things: 1) it completely demolishes the 'official conspiracy theory'; 2) it is material evidence that whomever ordered the 'responders' had reason to believe that dangerous radiation posed a threat to workers on the site. That the decontamination took place is evidence that they had been correct!

A 757 airliner is a civilian craft. It is not nuclear powered; it does not carry a nuclear war head or hardened nose cone. It carried no weaponry --conventional or nuclear! Had a 757 crashed the Pentagon there would have been no need to order decontamination procedures. No such procedures were carried out in New York. Clearly, 'officials' knew at the time that a civilian airliner had not crashed the Pentagon. Moreover, the only scenario that fully explains the necessity of decontamination procedures is that a military craft crashed into the Pentagon. It is my belief that that is what happened in fact.

As I have written time and again, Bush's official conspiracy theory is full of holes.
  • No part of it is defensible.
  • There is not a shred of hard evidence in support of it.
  • The 'story' itself is inconsistent.
  • It violates Occam's Razor, raising more questions than it explains.
  • It's a lousy theory. Even a bad theory should --at least --'sound' credible. Bush has only shock, trauma, grief and misplaced patriotism in his defense.

By contrast, every explanation is, in fact, a theory. Theories, despite what Bush and the media would have you believe, are how both law and science proceed. A set of related facts are explained by 'theories' which must, of necessity, explain all facts. Theories inconsistent with proven facts must be discarded as false. Bush's theory explains nothing and is inconsistent with established science. By contrast, a technology called 'Global Hawk may very well explain the seemingly inexplicable events of 911 and, at the same time, point an accusing finger.

The salient feature of Global Hawk technology is that it is operated by remote control. Google 'Global Hawk'. You will find several articles about how the US outfitted a plane with Global Hawk technology and flew it from California to Australia. No human pilot! No Arab hijackers! Remote control.
America's greatest crime against humanity is radioactive genocide particularly against the children of Iraq who are the innocent victims of our illegal war, occupation and economic rape of Iraq. We have the blood of countless innocent children on our hands and it will take generations to remove the stain of our illegal and inhumane transgressions. Currently, more than 50 percent of Iraqi cancer patients are children under the age of 5, up from 13 percent. Children are especially vulnerable because they tend to play in areas that are heavily polluted by depleted uranium.

--America's greatest crime is radioactive genocide
The most obvious holes in Bush's official conspiracy theory of 911 are connected with two buildings: WTC-7, ordered 'pulled' by Larry Silverstein; and the Pentagon where the 'debris' recovered doesn't add up to a 757 airliner which would have left behind several times the wreckage that was, in fact, recovered! [See: 911 ] The single engine 'rotor' that was found was only three feet in diameter. If a 757 had struck the Pentagon, two engines with rotors of about 9 feet in diameter would have been recovered. In fact, no other Pentagon wreckage was ever traced to an airliner of any sort.

The main reason for using "dense" or "heavy metal" in new version hard target bombs and cruise missiles is the increased kinetic energy available for an existing delivery system. High density metal (DU is 2.4 x heavier than Iron) means that the same weight length penetrator can be smaller diameter. This is important because new upgrades have to fit the same size missile bodies or bomb dispensers. See the FAS site http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/hdbtdc.htm Research data on ground penetration weapons relates penetration effectiveness to length against cross section area - thinner ones go deeper for the weight, whatever they are made of.

The pyrophoric (burns in air) quality of DU that helps it burn its way through armor is not relevant for the first stage of hitting hard targets. Bombs and cruise missiles go slower than anti-tank shells so DU is less likely to ignite on initial impact at slower speeds. Kinetic energy and nose cone design are most important to go through earth and concrete. Tungsten may be best for the tip if is not too brittle. But it would be far more expensive than DU for the main ballast or liners.

--Depleted Uranium Shells Against Afghanistan Population
If a real investigation of 911 should conclude that the weapon of choice was a Global Hawk, then the only conclusions consistent with that are:
  1. 911 was an inside job;
  2. the 'President' actively tried to cover up the crime of mass murder to protect members of his administration and to hide his own complicity;
  3. that tax monies --paid by US citizens to 'their' government were misappropriated and applied to the mass murder of fellow citizens.
Traditionally, treason is the name given serious acts of disloyalty to one's sovereign or one's nation. It was not until 1990, that the Criminal Justice Act (1990) removed the death penalty for acts of treason. But 911, is not only an act of high treason --the supreme act against one's country. 911 is a series of 'mass murders'. Certainly, if Bush were an ordinary human being subject to the laws that every other person is subject to, this crime would have landed him on death row in Texas awaiting a needle and an IV cocktail.


No Windows on Flight 175

It is hard, offhand, to cite a single crime in world history that is the equal of 911 in terms of sheer evil and horror. The name Bush will surely live in infamy. If Bush cannot be held accountable to the rule of law --which he claims to be above -- then it is the patriotic duty of good, truth-loving Americans to keep alive his memory. The name 'Bush' should, by rights, live forever in infamy beside the names of history's great mass murderers --Nero, Hitler, Stalin, and Pol Pot!


16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Terrific work, Len. Aerospace engineer Michael Meyer was involved in shaped charge explosives (like those that would be used in missile warheads) and concluded that a 757 did not impact at the Pentagon. 911exposed gives a great account of Pentagon anomalies. Carol A. Valentine notes (also here) that the Pentagon fire was brought under control in 7 minutes and asks why it subsequently "raged for 72 hours". Pentagon employee April Gallop saw no signs of a plane impact.

On another 911 issue New York City Housing Authority official Barry Jennings has reported on bombs in WTC7 before either of the twin towers was attacked.

Unknown said...

Terrific post, Damien. A wealth of information that I highly endorse. Michael Meyer's observation's with regard to the neat, circular punch out hole. I wonder if this is relevant to the fact that a soft-bodied aluminum airliner could not have penetrated the steel exterior of the Twin Towers. Certainly, a 'flash' is clearly seen just before impact on the South Tower.

From your link --911 Exposed --is a brilliant expose: The Barbara Olson Call. The call is the source of many myths and outright lies. The expose at this link is an ascerbic account of the five or six versions of Olson's 'phone call' cover --a call that could never have been made and was not made! Olson wisely stopped talking about it. He was digging his own grave. And one wonders where Barbara Olson is now. She most certainly did not place calls from Flight 77.

Anonymous said...

There is a real element of strangeness about the whole 911 story, Len, and Barbara Olson's alleged phone calls are a good example. She asks her husband what advice she should give to pilot Charles "Chic" Burlingame (who was standing near her at the rear of the plane), a burly ex-champion boxer and decorated former Navy pilot who had completed multiple training programs for dealing with hijackers. The idea that he would give up his pilot seat to a shy 5'1" Hani Hanjour armed with a box cutter is laughable. It's a joke. The only sense I can make of all this is that various hijacking exercises may have been taking place on 911 as part of the NORAD war games and that DOD officials and "trusted" members of the public were invited to play scripted roles in conversations with phone operators. When these particular war games "went live" (ie became real) it's possible that some of the scripted conversations that had been taped were then publicised as part of the PR aspect of the real 911 attacks. The whole sense of 911 is odd: the bizarre aircraft debris patterns, the Pentagon oddities, terrorist oddities. Atta received and sent back $100,000 he received in Florida yet Hani Hanjour complained when billed $80 for a no-show charge at a flight school. One video shows some of the terrorists making their way through an airport, yet the video has no date stamping and could not have come from airport cameras. I suspect that the 911 terrorists were patsies who believed they were either taking part in a trial run or a simulation exercise run by the US military. Whatever the real case, the official story is bunkum.

Unknown said...

damien said...

I suspect that the 911 terrorists were patsies who believed they were either taking part in a trial run or a simulation exercise run by the US military. Whatever the real case, the official story is bunkum.

I haven't ruled that out. But the fact that the BBC interviewed several 'hijackers' that were supposed to be dead has led me to doubt the very existence of a 'team' of hijackers. I would have expected the recovery of hijacker bodies from the Pentagon. But there are only unidentified remains at Arlington and a 'flight manifest' and an 'coronor's report' with NO hijacker names, indeed, no arab names at all.

There is, really, no evidence whatsoever that any 'hijackers' were ever on any airplane at any time.

Anonymous said...

Wow, Len, ain't been here in a while. Did you always doubt the govt's 9/11 story? I did from, oh, about September 13. When they produced the flame-proof passports and the list of names and pictures I thought things were a bit too tidy, and nothing has changed my mind since then.

Still, I wonder where the hard wall is that people maintain when you point up the inconsistencies in the official 9/11 story. The only thing I can identify is a craven belief that Americans wouldn't kill other Americans--certainly not the GOVERNMENT. The GOVERNMENT wouldn't do such a thing--why, it's made of Americans!

Anonymous said...

I expressed myself badly, Len. I was trying to outline a scenario which might account for some of the phone calls but I really have no idea what happened to any of the 911 terrorists once they got to the airports. Anything could have happened: nerve gassing the passengers, remote controlled flights etc. Anything. Your are correct to insist that there is no proof there were any terrorists on any of the planes. Cheers, mate.

Unknown said...

Anonymous said...

Wow, Len, ain't been here in a while. Did you always doubt the govt's 9/11 story?

My very, very first thought on that day --as the attacks were still underway --was this: REICHSTAG FIRE!

I kept my powder dry and still have for the most part. I knew that Bushies would slip up and incriminate themselves. They are less than half as smart as they think they are! These people are as arrogant as they are stupid! When the find themselves in front of a firing squad or under a hangman's noose, it will be because they seriously, seriously fucked up! High Treason, mass murder, obstruction of justice, evidence tampering, intimidation of witnesses --there are probably as many CRIMINAL OFFENSES that can be charged to this gang as there are 'impeachable offenses' detailed in Ron Paul's articles.

If you want to see some previous '911' efforts, click on the label '911'. I have a link to it in my article. It will bring up all my previous articles labeled: '911'.

Still, I wonder where the hard wall is that people maintain when you point up the inconsistencies in the official 9/11 story. The only thing I can identify is a craven belief that Americans wouldn't kill other Americans--certainly not the GOVERNMENT.

Well the sad fact is Americans don't really care all that much about Americans who are of another 'class' and America is among the most class conscious countries in the world. That's a lesson I learned with my very first trip to England. The 'Lord of the Manor' would actually have an 'ale' with the locals in the neighborhood pub. I even met Lord Spencer, Princess Diana's father. Albeit brief, I had a very cordial conversation with him. He was a nice guy.

Damien wrote..

I expressed myself badly, Len. I was trying to outline a scenario which might account for some of the phone calls but I really have no idea what happened to any of the 911 terrorists once they got to the airports.

I'm probably the one who expressed myself badly. As for the terrorists, the 'fireproof' passports and the photos you refer to might not get admitted in evidence. Even if they were, they would be ripped to shreds by competent counsel. There's no pedigree. There is only the word of liars that they are what the government says they are. I would love to get a forensic expert to examine the 'licenses'. There goes the government's case. Bush has absolutely noting that could withstand cross examination by a first year law student.

Indeed, Damien, I must bow to your the sheer sweep of your grasp of this crime. It was asked earlier when I had begun to doubt the government cover stories. Answer is: always! I'VE JUST been waiting around for the slip ups.

Anonymous said...

As a former First Responder (Firefighter/EMT), I can answer one of your points: "Decontamination" is used when someone is exposed to any "hazardous material," not just radiation. Most decontaminations involve exposure to toxic or caustic chemicals.

Large buildings often house a plethora of potentially dangerous stuff so decontamination is a fairly common practice.

However, decontamination is typically done on-site, since you want to limit the Responders' exposure. And you always decontaminate before transporting people -- even if they are injured.

Anonymous said...

That being said, let me say that Bush's excuses are STILL full of holes. It is just that decontamination is not one of them.

Anonymous said...

Hello,

You wrote - begin quote:

Now --if Bush is guilty, his refusal to release the photos is completely understandable! A photo of a Global Hawk, for example, is compelling evidence, perhaps a 'smoking gun', that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. If Bush were entirely innocent of all wrong doing in connection with 911, it would have been in his interest to release every photograph and to have ordered a complete and thorough investigation of 911. Only if Bush is guilty is it in his interest to 'cover it up'. He covered it up and continues to cover it up today! Draw your own conclusions.

end quote.


I suspect that there are many convoluted and compartmentalized layers to the crime of 911, to the first baby-step of "imperial mobilization", with the eventual end goal of one world government after several more baby-steps. The causal chain of incremental events orchestrated, one baby-step at a time, by constructing "revolutionary times", is non-trivial to comprehend by most peoples, including those in power, due to the sheer diabolicalness of its sophistication.


Only if the above forensic statement is correct, can the following statements make sense:


1) The 43rd President of United States is neither smart enough, nor diabolical enough, to comprehend any of these far thinking and highly sophisticated baby-steps, let alone orchestrate any of them. As guilty as he is as the commander-in-chief of the sole superpower, of signing off on the supreme crime of aggression by launching the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, endorsing Israel's decimation of Lebanon with American weapons and realtime warfare technology assist, and now looking forward to nuclear decimating Iran, Pakistan, and Syria, President Bush, IMHO, fell into the precise trap for which he was chosen to become President - largely because of his easy malleability and obsession with Evangelical Christianity, Rapture, Armageddon, while being the scion of the house of Bush and thus able to be relied upon. No differently than in any “family” business where blood is thicker than water!!

2) The US President, in all likelihood, was presented with the fait-accompli of 911. Perhaps a coup d'etat on America with nuclear blackmail – as Webster Tarpley conjectures to explain the bizarre “nuclear launch code” episode and the President shuttling to air bases which control America's nuclear arsenal, on the day of 911. See his book “9/11 Synthetic Terror”. Some of it, as a black-box model, holistically explains many of the observable facts of that day of infamy than almost any other analysis of 911.

3) There is no doubt that 911 was an “inside” job. But which “inside”? If there was a coup d'etat on America, than the real mastermind plotters will for sure remain behind the scenes. It is quite possible that the US President still has very little clue of what he is constantly being “managed” to sign off on through compartmentalized handlers. The President's blatantly manifest guilt is at least in aiding and abetting after the fact of 911, and in its cover-up for a higher purpose that is deliberately whispered to him in his left ear by his “father in heaven”. But not necessarily in the orchestration and commission of 911. For that, there are some far smarter ubermenschen. And I dare think, even in the White House as we speak. That evil twin of “Hari Seldon” of the “Second Foundationers” fame, is the overarching mastermind. That person is the one at whose doorsteps, the buck stops! And that person is ONE single person representing a coterie of ruling interests – most of whom also likely don't know who that person is. It has to be one 'uber' brilliant system architect, one like Hari Seldon, who has foreseen how these events will unfold in a controlled orchestration, and subsequently, compartmentalized its baby-step implementation plan and assigned to various black-ops teams for execution. Such a person must be so well plugged into power that he not only can count upon the trust and fealty of those whom he directly interacts with, but also intimately understand the various mechanics needed for implementation. I don't think George Bush can at all be guilty of any of that anymore than Ronald Reagan was guilty of orchestrating Iran-Contra. President Reagan signed off on the pieces of paper put before him (and guess by whom?), but he couldn't have come up with that convoluted plan, nor understood it even after watching it on television – suffering from a decaying mind and memory loss that he was! The power-wielders need such patsies in the White House! Others, if they get to the White House and remain un co-opted, they make to "sleep with the fishes".

4) The poor President of the United States is, IMHO, very likely the dispensable fall guy – because only a genuine moron would agree to go down in history as a Hitler! Others, ex post facto, in a hundred years, will be heralded as the real imperial thinkers, masterminds, and leaders of the time - the ones who orchestrated the long cherished dream of world government! Today, they prefer to stay comfortably covert. Yes we do glimpse these aspiration in the writings of some peoples occasionally, such as Zbigniew Brzezinski, but none of these writings can hang them. Only the subsequent Acts can - and they are far too competent to be caught in the act!!

5) This is why, all this focus on impeachment, etc., is great for the master plan for ushering in One-World Government - for it will continue on with a new fall guy! See "Impeachment alone does not solve the problem!"
http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/06/impeachment-does-not-solve-problem.html

6) Many feel that the goal is to permanently destroy the United States to create a third-world nation. For instance, see “The Coming Catastrophe? The finishing touches on several contingency plans for attacking Iran”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9437

It really isn't. The goal appears to be to create a supra United States, piece-meal, by raising a greater phoenix from the ashes, a “Zion that will light up all the World”, a world that “refers to one type of situation, namely one centre of authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision-making. It is world in which there is one master, one sovereign.”

Many "organizational structures" are possible for that overarching New World Order, and none of them necessarily entail the destruction of the United States – only the enablement of UN troops patrolling the streets of Los Angeles as foreseen by Henry Kissinger, to create larger regional organizational entities. Perhaps to create critical mass for new baby-steps. I too now tend to believe, that the days of arbitrarily constructed independent nation-states are indeed practically over. Our children or grandchildren see arbitrarily constructed dependent territories managed by a technocratic minority ruling elite, in accordance with the above quoted description by Vladimir Putin of the "unipolar world", all paying allegiance to one "sovereign".

In this new world order, mankind is a micro-chipped commodity, able to be turned off at will. Perhaps eventually turned into "soylent green"?

In that devilishly diabolical global master plan, President George W. Bush Jr., is only the glorified poster-boy for its phase-1! And he is deliberately being made the center of attention as the obvious fall guy. IMHO.


Thanks for the comprehensive compilation of references. Very useful.


Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
http://humanbeingsfirst.org

kelley b. said...

What happened on 9/11 was likely a convergence of conspiracies of many different factions who realized the hit was on.

Look carefully at the initial videos of Dear Leader after he was informed of the event: he first has the far-away poker face look of "here we go" and afterwards the look of someone who realizes they're no longer running the show.

Of course, that could have been disinformation. Pretty much everything that was- and is- said about it is rife with that. There seem to be even cover-ups of smokescreens.

But one thing that is very hard to hide is where all the money went, and where the money disappeared from view. Take what the CIA used WTC7 for, or the insurance policies on the Twin Towers, or the market shifts the day before, or the couple of trillion dollars that Rumsfeld announced the Pentagon couldn't account for on September 10th. Those trails may help historians unravel motivation and opportunity as much as any smoking gun ever did.

Anonymous said...

are people aware of these developments in 911 truth?

Emergency Official Witnessed Dead Bodies In WTC 7
In exclusive video, Barry Jennings discusses explosions in Building 7 before collapse of twin towers
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, June 23, 2008
| http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit

Exclusive video of emergency official Barry Jennings discussing explosions inside WTC 7 before either of the twin towers had collapsed and having to step over dead bodies of victims as he attempted to vacate the building has been released for the first time.
The clip, which was originally intended to feature in Loose Change Final Cut but had to be withdrawn according to Jennings' wishes after he had received threats, has now been made public in anticipation of a BBC documentary about Building 7 which is expected to skew Jennings' account in an attempt to reinforce the official story.
In reality, what Jennings witnessed completely contradicts the official story of what happened to Building 7.
On the morning of 9/11 in his capacity as Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, New York City Housing Authority, Jennings and Michael Hess, who is a founding Partner and Senior Managing Director of Giuliani Partners LLC, visited the Office of Emergency Management inside Building 7 only to find it had been abandoned.
"Upon arriving into the OEM EOC, we noticed that everybody was gone," said Jennings. "I saw coffee that was on the desk, the smoke was still coming off the coffee, I saw half-eaten sandwiches," he stated, adding that he and Hess were told to leave the building right away.
Jennings and Hess found a stairwell and descended the stairs.
"When we reached the 6th floor the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way, I was left there hanging, I had to climb back up and walk back up to the 8th floor," said Jennings.
"The explosion was beneath me....so when the explosion happened it blew us back....both buildings (the twin towers) were still standing," he added.
"I was trapped in there for several hours, I was trapped in there when both buildings came down - all this time I'm hearing all kinds of explosions, all this time I'm hearing explosions, said Jennings, adding that when firefighters took them down to the lobby it was in "total ruins".
"For me to see what I saw was unbelievable," said Jennings.

Barry Jennings.
The firefighters kept saying to Jennings "do not look down" because, according to Jennings, "we were stepping over people and you can tell when you're stepping over people."
A police officer then told Jennings, "you will have to run because we have reports of more explosions."
"I'm just confused about one thing....why World Trade Center 7 went down in the first place - I'm very confused about that - I know what I heard I heard explosions," said Jennings, adding that the explanation that the explosions were as a result of fuel oil tanks in the building did not add up.
"I'm an old boiler guy, if it was a fuel oil tank it would have been one side of the building," he stated.
Footage inside the Millennium Hilton building lobby, which was closer to the WTC twin towers than Building 7, shows minimal damage after both towers had collapsed in comparison with devastating damage in the lobby of WTC 7, as reported by Jennings, before either tower had even collapsed.
Jennings' eyewitness report of explosions inside WTC 7 before the towers had collapsed as well as dead bodies inside the building completely contradicts the official story, which maintains that there were no fatalities inside Building 7.
If WTC 7 collapsed as a result of damage it sustained from the fall of the twin towers, as the official version claims, then why were explosions taking place inside the building before either tower had collapsed?
The BBC hit piece documentary, which airs on July 6th, features an interview with Jennings but according to Loose Change's Jason Bermas, the program will distort Jennings' comments in an attempt to sideline the shocking nature of what he witnessed and the blatant manner in which his experiences contradict the official story.
According to Bermas, during their interview with members of Loose Change, the BBC denied that Jennings had stepped over dead bodies when he left the building, a claim disproved by Jennings' own statements in the video below.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/062308_dead_bodies.htm


Brian

Unknown said...

I wrote 'Ron Paul's articles' earlier. Obviously, I had meant Dennis Kucinich's articles of impeachment.

Cathexis said...

As a former First Responder (Firefighter/EMT), I can answer one of your points: "Decontamination" is used when someone is exposed to any "hazardous material," not just radiation.

I appreciate your comment as well because you are a 'first responder'. It is interesting, however, that there was no 'de-contamination' procedure as there was at the Pentagon.

kelley b. said...

What happened on 9/11 was likely a convergence of conspiracies of many different factions who realized the hit was on.

I am still content (for now) drive vehicles through the enormous holes in Bush's official conspiracy theory. The Global Hawk, however, seems the only 'weapon of choice' that adequately explains what happened at the Pentagon. Another good bet is that the 'scenario' that was 'gamed' just a few months prior to 911, was, in fact the 'dress rehearsal' and Dick Cheney co-ordinatated the whole thing. Certainly --this scenario is consistent with the testimony of Norman Mineta.

Anonymous said...

are people aware of these developments in 911 truth? Emergency Official Witnessed Dead Bodies In WTC 7

I saw that today but have not had time to follow up. Indeed, this is 'dynamite' and thanks for posting and sharing here.

I hope to follow up soon.

Keep up the great work...this thing, I think, is about to fall apart completely. And when it does, the US will have to build a new government from scratch. The is a case of THE GOVERNMENT declaring and waging war upon the people of the United States.

kelley b. said...

Not the government, the people who think they are the government.

There's a difference.

Unknown said...

kelley b. said...

Not the government, the people who think they are the government.

And that describes, I believe, the shadowy complex of corporate interests who have literally BOUGHT the apparatus of government for their own purposes. These folk really don't give a shit what mere 'electorate' have to say about anything.

Lee Shin said...

spot on with this write-up, i like the way you discuss the things. i'm impressed, i must say. i'll probably be back again to read more. thanks for sharing this with us.

Lee Shin
www.trendone.net